Underage incest fantasys

It isn't really a matter of what's legal anyhow. Incest is generally illegal, but it is common here. Certain coercive sex would be illegal some places, but it's okay here, although violent rape would not be. Bestiality is also banned here, although it might not be illegal everywhere.

Those are not complaints, mind you, just observations. If I want to write stories that are forbidden here, I can, and post them elsewhere. :cool:
And I do so. :cool:
 
Although it may not be evident on this forum, the ole Amicus can be a rather good listener and promptor for extended conversations.

Over the years I have cultivated aqaintances with dozens of females of all ages around the world, thus what I am about to assert is not gleaned from a single source, but many.

I suggest that the overwhelming concern about the 'innocence' of young girls is rather misplaced and inaccurate in terms of the reality of the actual truth of the matter in general.

Girls at a very young age discover that massaging the clitoris is most pleasurable and they do it consistently, daily and more for some. They are also very curious and will insert first a finger then other objects into the vagina, just to experience the feeling.

Add to that, that many young girls have equally curious brothers and sexual exploration begins at an early age for both. Some girls are engaged in fondling penis's and bringing about erections long before one might expect.

Even more, as pubescence arrives, when boys and girls are separated, girls are permitted to sleep together and even sleep over at other girls homes. The beginning of breast buds is very curious to all and early experimentation is quite common among young girls. Even to the extent of playing mom and baby with girls suckling each other and pretending to be 'mom' or 'baby' with the appropriate nursing sounds being made.

Thus, many young girls have a healthy and natural curiousity about sexual activity at a very early age and are hardly, 'innocent', as the term is being applied on this thread.

It is also somewhat well known that the female, far more than the male, is more sensitive to tactile stimulation in almost all aspects of existence, from sight and sound to taste, smell and touch.

I would suggest that the 'first time' experience between members of the opposite sex is merely a continuation of sexual discovery and not nearly the traumatic event characterized by many on this thread.

Do not read into my words an advocacy of any sort, other than to reiterate that thinking about, writing about, early sexual awakenings is an area sadly neglected and I suggest it should not be.

Amicus...
 
Recently there have been several cases involving teachers and underage boys. I will never be able to consider those boys to be "victims" because I remember myself at that age. They are strictly the beneficiaries of the teachers' rather unusual desires.

Define 'rather unusual'.
 
Although it may not be evident on this forum, the ole Amicus can be a rather good listener and promptor for extended conversations....
You have got that right, it's definitely not evident on this forum. If you were a good listener, you would have "heard" many of these statements already-- made by people whom you've then attacked for something other than what they've said;
Over the years I have cultivated aqaintances with dozens of females of all ages around the world, thus what I am about to assert is not gleaned from a single source, but many.

I suggest that the overwhelming concern about the 'innocence' of young girls is rather misplaced and inaccurate in terms of the reality of the actual truth of the matter in general.

Girls at a very young age discover that massaging the clitoris is most pleasurable and they do it consistently, daily and more for some. They are also very curious and will insert first a finger then other objects into the vagina, just to experience the feeling.

Add to that, that many young girls have equally curious brothers and sexual exploration begins at an early age for both. Some girls are engaged in fondling penis's and bringing about erections long before one might expect.
I think several women have already intimated ideas quite like these, already. Including myself.

Even more, as pubescence arrives, when boys and girls are separated, girls are permitted to sleep together and even sleep over at other girls homes. The beginning of breast buds is very curious to all and early experimentation is quite common among young girls. Even to the extent of playing mom and baby with girls suckling each other and pretending to be 'mom' or 'baby' with the appropriate nursing sounds being made.

Thus, many young girls have a healthy and natural curiousity about sexual activity at a very early age and are hardly, 'innocent', as the term is being applied on this thread.
Many, but certainly not all, and this is not really the issue, is it. The real issue is whether or not adults-- and more specifically, their fathers-- are entitled to presume upon this "lack of innocence."
It is also somewhat well known that the female, far more than the male, is more sensitive to tactile stimulation in almost all aspects of existence, from sight and sound to taste, smell and touch.
and that leads you to what conclusion?

I would suggest that the 'first time' experience between members of the opposite sex is merely a continuation of sexual discovery and not nearly the traumatic event characterized by many on this thread.
many on this thread have characterised the unexpected, and unwilling sexual discovery, forced upon a young girl by an adult-- as having many traumatic effects upon her body and mind. If you're going to shake your finger, try to shake it in the right direction. (Fat chance, I know)
Do not read into my words an advocacy of any sort, other than to reiterate that thinking about, writing about, early sexual awakenings is an area sadly neglected and I suggest it should not be.

Amicus...
I think you should do that writing. No one will stop you from doing so, Ami. You want it done? Make it your job.
 
Although it may not be evident on this forum, the ole Amicus can be a rather good listener and promptor for extended conversations.

Over the years I have cultivated aqaintances with dozens of females of all ages around the world, thus what I am about to assert is not gleaned from a single source, but many.

I suggest that the overwhelming concern about the 'innocence' of young girls is rather misplaced and inaccurate in terms of the reality of the actual truth of the matter in general.

Girls at a very young age discover that massaging the clitoris is most pleasurable and they do it consistently, daily and more for some. They are also very curious and will insert first a finger then other objects into the vagina, just to experience the feeling.

Add to that, that many young girls have equally curious brothers and sexual exploration begins at an early age for both. Some girls are engaged in fondling penis's and bringing about erections long before one might expect.

Even more, as pubescence arrives, when boys and girls are separated, girls are permitted to sleep together and even sleep over at other girls homes. The beginning of breast buds is very curious to all and early experimentation is quite common among young girls. Even to the extent of playing mom and baby with girls suckling each other and pretending to be 'mom' or 'baby' with the appropriate nursing sounds being made.

Thus, many young girls have a healthy and natural curiousity about sexual activity at a very early age and are hardly, 'innocent', as the term is being applied on this thread.

It is also somewhat well known that the female, far more than the male, is more sensitive to tactile stimulation in almost all aspects of existence, from sight and sound to taste, smell and touch.

I would suggest that the 'first time' experience between members of the opposite sex is merely a continuation of sexual discovery and not nearly the traumatic event characterized by many on this thread.

Do not read into my words an advocacy of any sort, other than to reiterate that thinking about, writing about, early sexual awakenings is an area sadly neglected and I suggest it should not be.

Amicus...

Generally speaking, I think men are more sight-oriented, at least in terms of sexual stimulation.

I believe that having a man's cock thrust into a virginal 12 year old vagina, or into the girl's ass, would be extremely traumatic.
 
Umm... tentacles?

You know, there actually is tentacle porn out there. Tentacle hentai.

Course, there's also balloon porn. Risque pics of women rolling around like dirty sluts in pits of...balloons!

Not sure which one is stranger...
 
I've written tentacle porn and balloon porn.

I can't refuse a challenge.

Og

Methinks you tell a tall tale. I want links!

Edited to add: Okay, I swear those links didn't show up until after I'd posted this!
 
Boy. Am I glad I took a long break from this discussion. And I'm even happier I've got Ami on ignore, though I really wish you folks would stop quoting him. Real waste of space.

So, look. Getting back to the original, original, original discussion...and brass tacks. People come to this forum and they ask, their nose all out of joint, "Why can't I write up a story about a girl under 18 having sex with her daddy? It's just fantasy!" And we say, in most cases reasonably and rationally: "The rules say you can't have such stories on this forum. Sorry." Their point is that if it's fantasy, who cares? And we, as writers, may well agree. As pointed out along the way, we writers do explore such things, as Nabakov did in Lolita. And we can certainly, in erotica, explore the erotic elements of some things that we'd never do or find erotic in real life.

BUT...the launching of this whole mess was over a post that said: "I would love to have a womans perspective on what it would be like to have sex at say 15 with your father..... I suspect the emotions and feelings would be far more erotic than anything I can imagine. Sex for the first time for a little girl has to be painful, but emotionally rewarding at the same time."

Now, perhaps the writer wants to have a woman's fantasy of having sex at 15 with her father. But the responses Rifraff got were not wrong--because he's not calling up a for phone porn at $4 a minute. Call up a woman on the phone and tell her, "Give me your perspective of being 15 and penetrated by your daddy..." and she'll offer the caller the fantasy he's after, all the "Oh, daddy was so big and painful...but so rewarding because I trusted him...." blah, blah, blah. Complete and utter fantasy, exactly what he wants to IMAGINE it'd be like, the little girl felt "rewarded" by daddy, and he can revel in the fantasy of how it must feel for a woman to have experienced this, instead of dwelling on the tiring, realistic facts that most such girls end up emotionally, sexually and psychologically damaged.

Rifraff's offense was not his fantasy. It was his assumption that female erotica writers are going to respond like women on the phone getting money to tell him what he wants to hear RATHER than honest writers who are going to give him well researched truths because they lace their erotica with verisimilitude. All of which branched off into this long-assed discussion. Which isn't about written fantasy of incest or kiddie sex, but rather, mainly, about at what age a teen should be allowed to consent to sex--never mind who with for the moment.

The original question was "Why is fantasy sex with kids forbidden on this forum. It's just a fantasy!" and the answer is simply because Laurel and Manu say so. End discussion. Should it be forbidden by law anywhere? *shrug* I honestly don't know if any fantasy of any kind should be forbidden or not by law. The next question was essentially, a guy saying "Will some woman please tell me the fantasy I want to hear/that I dream a woman has about being molested by her father at age 15."

I don't know that that sort of post deserved all this strum and dang, but there you go.
 
Last edited:
They didn't. I was busy editing them in. :D

Og

Alright, I'll give you the squid, but your balloon story wasn't true balloon porn. It's gotta be those normal balloons like the ones for birthday parties.

Could start off like: Anne was cleaning up after her daughter's birthday party when she looked across the room and saw them. Red, yellow, blue, and green; they were all taunting her with their luscious, air-filled forms...
 
Alright, I'll give you the squid, but your balloon story wasn't true balloon porn. It's gotta be those normal balloons like the ones for birthday parties.

...[/I]

But who else has written anything about balloons?

Og
 
Really, 3113, we can have any discussion we like, wherever. The ass who started the thread isn't here listening to it, and likely wouldn't care or understand. So what? Heavens. You'd think there were rules or something, to hear you talk. ;)
 
note to 3113

Now, perhaps the writer wants to have a woman's fantasy of having sex at 15 with her father. But the responses Rifraff got were not wrong--because he's not calling up a for phone porn at $4 a minute. Call up a woman on the phone and tell her, "Give me your perspective of being 15 and penetrated by your daddy..." and she'll offer the caller the fantasy he's after, all the "Oh, daddy was so big and painful...but so rewarding because I trusted him...." blah, blah, blah.

Complete and utter fantasy, exactly what he wants to IMAGINE it'd be like, the little girl felt "rewarded" by daddy, and he can revel in the fantasy of how it must feel for a woman to have experienced this, instead of dwelling on the tiring, realistic facts that most such girls end up emotionally, sexually and psychologically damaged.

Rifraff's offense was not his fantasy. It was his assumption that female erotica writers are going to respond like women on the phone getting money to tell him what he wants to hear RATHER than honest writers who are going to give him well researched truths because they lace their erotica with verisimilitude.


===

hi 3113,

you set up two extremes,

Call up a woman on the phone and tell her, "Give me your perspective of being 15 and penetrated by your daddy..." and she'll offer the caller the fantasy he's after

[women who are] honest writers who are going to give him well researched truths because they lace their erotica with verisimilitude
----

i realize you're making a point, but between verbal phone whore and 'honest erotica writer' [both women] are hundreds of possibilities.

looking at lit stories. which are in the porn/erotica continuum, how many are by 'honest' writers conveying 'well researched truths.'?

my guess is 5%. most of the stories, by men and women have a clear 'stroke' value and orientation.

i wonder is you are alleging that women writers tend more to be in the latter, truths-and-research camp? i wouldn't know. i'll concede that father daughter incest fantasies are mostly by men, although the 'handles' used may not reflect the gender.

i don't think that women writers are inherently less prone to prostitute themselves, if that's what it is. the 'delta of venus', by nin, was written for payment by the word. is she just a verbal phone whore who's taken to writing?

further, the suggestion seems to be that the woman is going to be protective of the *real* 15 year-old-young women, in writing a *fantasy*, through a kind of gender solidarity.

yet this gender protectiveness, does it exist? how universal is it?
suppose i as a male write a story of a 18 year old guy who's beset with 5 horny males and 'raped', but he turns, out, literotica [and porn] style, to enjoy it. i don't see a problem with that [as a sex-fantasy story], depite its NOT being laced with truths.

by extension, i don't see a problem for a woman porn writer in having, within a story, a young woman who's ill used, and literotica [and porn] style, turns out to enjoy it. indeed, isn't there a thread here in AH, with (apparently) a woman's request for a gangbang [of herself] story.

it might be added that it's entirely possible for a woman porn writer to aim at men.

if it's less common now for women writers to portray ill-used, but orgasmic women, perhaps the genders will move toward equalization.
===

the postings that started it all

incest fantasy /I was wondering if It reading and writing about underage incest fantays..especially about younger girls....is as disgusting as I sometimes feel it is. I do NOT condone Kiddy porn NOR sexual abuse in any way of minors, but it is still a fantasy of mine....but not that I wan't to be WITH the girl, but that I wan't to BE the girl....so would writing fantays like that make me a bad person? //

riffraff //It is hard for me to believe that thinking is a crime, I certainly hope you WILL explore these fantasies for us in print. I would love to have a womans perspective on what it would be like to have sex at say 15 with your father..... I suspect the emotions and feelings would be far more erotic than anything I can imagine. Sex for the first time for a little girl has to be painful, but emotionally rewarding at the same time. I hope you will explore this! I know I would love to read it.//
 
Last edited:
After talking to a friend who had many experiences when she was underage with much older man which I will not detail she only looks back at that time in her life with pain. There was drug use and lack of parenting, but even the consensual sex partners she had were men taking advantage of her because she felt the need to be loved.

Another friend who confided in my told of sex with her three male cousins at different times. By the last she said she felt loved and enjoyed it until she realized she was being raped over an over again when she was old enough to appreciate what was going on.


I see no value in these stories and they're truly in fantasy as far as I am concern, because they don't have a shread of reality in them. Thinking children are sexual beings that are wanton and lustful little animals. It seems wrong beause it is wrong.

You want to express your fantasies fine. I am just glad it isn't here. Just don't think your being presecuted or fighting censorship. You aren't fighting the good fight. You just want to do something at is consider wrong in almost every modern culture.

I have friends who lost their virginity underage with another underager, but I don't feel censored for not being about to write about first loves. I certainly don't feel limited in that I can't write about molestations.

If you really knew about the amount of pain involved and the damaged adults you get you wouldn't have the fantasies either.
 
I think some of the problems here might come from the difference between being an author and a consumer. I talked about this before on the Abject Sex thread, the fact that, as an author, I almost always have to immerse myself more deeply in the minds and emotions of my characters than will the person who reads my story. For me to do underage incest, I would literally have to use my feelings towards my own daughters as a launching place. In other words, to do an honest job on an underage daddy-daughter incest story, I'd have to fantasize incest with my own daughters in order to understand the feelings involved. This is something I'm not willing to do for the rewards of writing a Lit story.

So I suppose what it comes down to for me is personal squeamishness, the Squick factor, is it?

We had a big discussion on incest stories in general once, and one of the things we found is that very few people who write them ever think about having incest with their own family members. So the situation is similar to what 3113 mentions--you have the fantasy version of what readers (usually men, I'd imagine) would like incest to be, and then you have the more realistic version which most people seem to be too disgusted to even contemplate, which is them fucking their own daughters or being fucked by their fathers.

I suppose there's no reason why we can't write whatever kind of fantasies we want, with fathers screwing ten year-olds and the children having amazing orgasms, or talking horses and flying carpets for that matter, because these are, after all, "just stories" and we're free to write whatever we want, but as an author I feel I have a higher responsibility than to write that kind of fantasy.

In any case, I freely admit that my feelings about underage incest are all tangled up with feelings of filial love and protection, so I'm not likely to venture into this area any time soon.

Be interesting to know who of us in this discussion are parents and who aren't. Becoming a parent changes you more than anything you'll ever do in life, and changes you in totally unexpected ways.
 
Last edited:
looking at lit stories. which are in the porn/erotica continuum, how many are by 'honest' writers conveying 'well researched truths.'?

my guess is 5%. most of the stories, by men and women have a clear 'stroke' value and orientation.
And that 5% is probably all here :D I can't speak for everyone, obviously, but if I were writing pure stroke stories, I really wouldn't need to come here and discuss things like "what would a dispatcher say if there was a murder?" and "what was sex really like in ancient rome?" or even, "Men, what does it really feel like when...." Can we/will we write just stroke stories? Of course. Will we write it on command because Rifraff gets off on it and wants to hear it from us women writers and asks us to do so with clear instructions as to how he wants the fantasy to go? ("painful but rewarding")

My response, and the response of most of the women writers here would seem to be "Let me tell you the truth instead....." Which I'm guessing is a "no, we won't writer that stroke story just for you."

i don't think that women writers are inherently less prone to prostitute themselves, if that's what it is. the 'delta of venus', by nin, was written for payment by the word. is she just a verbal phone whore who's taken to writing?
I didn't say they were--and Nin's a really bad example by the way as, from what she says and does with some of the men in her life, she probably would have enjoyed being a phone prostitute, herself. Still, if Rifraff comes back and says, "I'll give you a $1000 for that story," I and a dozen others here will take him up on it. All writers are whores, though it may not be money that they're after. My point is that he was doing what so many readers do when they come here..."create a fantasy for me, writers...for free. Here's my idea. Ain't it erotic? Write it up like that for me...." :p

further, the suggestion seems to be that the woman is going to be protective of the *real* 15 year-old-young women, in writing a *fantasy*, through a kind of gender solidarity.
Not at all. Selena's story is evidence against that. BUT there WILL be solidarity in a thread on the subject when a man makes such an assumption ("I imagine it would be painful but rewarding") and that assumption *could* be in regards to reality, not fantasy. I don't say that's what he meant, but the post was fairly ambiguous on that score, and it's not surprising it got a knee-jerk response from women writers (the 5% who tend to do research for their stories) saying, "It isn't rewarding!"
 
For me to do underage incest, I would literally have to use my feelings towards my own daughters as a launching place. In other words, to do an honest job on an underage daddy-daughter incest story, I'd have to fantasize incest with my own daughters in order to understand the feelings involved. This is something I'm not willing to do for the rewards of writing a Lit story.
You make some really good points, Dr. M. And I think a lot of it comes down to this. A throw-away stroke story is one thing, but an erotic story where the reader wants to get into the character's head--where they want to know not only how the sex feels but how the character responds to it emotionally and psychologically (like Rifraff's "painful but rewarding"), requires that the writer do what they do best and really imagine themselves in that situation.

Which is not to say, of course, that a really bad writer, who did no research and hasn't a clue as to how people really feel or think couldn't come up with such a story and make a big splash with it. Writers come up with the worst dreck imaginable, including complete lies about how people would feel and think about things and readers, who like what they read, will swallow it hook, line and sinker. BUT, an honest writer won't do that. They'll do the research and they'll try to get into the character's head, into a real part of themselves, and they'll try to tell it like it is. Lolita disturbed people because it realistically got readers into the head of a molester. It wasn't clearly and evidently, a stroke-story fantasy.

I suppose there's no reason why we can't write whatever kind of fantasies we want, with fathers screwing ten year-olds and the children having amazing orgasms, or talking horses and flying carpets for that matter, because these are, after all, "just stories" and we're free to write whatever we want, but as an author I feel I have a higher responsibility than to write that kind of fantasy.
And this, too, is an excellent point. We run into a very sticky situation with censorship. We want to say that there should be any at all. Hey, we're writers and we don't want anyone telling us what we can an cannot write. But we often try to have it both ways with writing. We often put our writing on public display because we WANT to move and sway people (and enjoy doing so!), but then someone takes what we write and acts on it and we say, "Hey, it was just a story...."

People argue and come to blows over fictional characters; they cry and remain disturbed for life over the death of fictional characters. They're inspired (as with "The Tales of Young Werner") to commit suicide, do drugs, experiment sexually, change their religion, etc. etc. etc. Even if it's all just fantasy and they KNOW it's fantasy. The pen really is mightier than the sword. And for us to say, "Hey, it's just fantasy!" is to really fool ourselves. What we imagine in our heads but don't act upon is one thing--and the start of this thread. But what we imagine, write up and put out for everyone else to read may do something. We don't always know what, nor can we possibly predict. Rowling could have hardly predicted her influence on so many kids. But once it's on paper--or on the internet--it's out there and it rarely can be taken back. So a writer better be willing and able to stand behind it. Not just say, "It's a harmless fantasy."

Storytellers can motivate, change, effect and alter human beings in ways no one else can. Most of us likely won't, but one never knows when we'll hit a nerve or set fire to the Zeitgeist. A writer shouldn't be held responsible if a bunch of kids commit suicide after reading about a character who does so in a way that seems romantic and heroic...but a writer should be able to say, "I'm not sorry I wrote this--" if they do.
 
looking at lit stories. which are in the porn/erotica continuum, how many are by 'honest' writers conveying 'well researched truths.'?
Mine.
:cool:

I can't remember ever ever thinking that parent-child incest would remotely be erotic. I've fantasized brother/sister incest (and I have no actual brother) and brother/brother (and i still have no actual brother)
Having children didn't change that much for me, obviously!
 
note to jagged

If you [not sure who is referred to] really knew about the amount of pain involved and the damaged adults you get you wouldn't have the fantasies either.

P: this is a bit like saying, if you knew the amount of pain involved in a real whipping you wouldn't have whipping fantasies. perhaps true for you, jagged, but not for many others, including myself.

the topic's been addressed several times for other acts. i don't think the writer of a forced sex story, with a degree of pleasure for the victim, is necessarily oblivious to the real suffering in most real rapes.

it is quite surprising to see so many postings that deride "just fantasy." it sure seems like a double standard. i bet even 3113, who laces her stories with verisimilitude, has read the occasional one.
 
If you [not sure who is referred to] really knew about the amount of pain involved and the damaged adults you get you wouldn't have the fantasies either.

P: this is a bit like saying, if you knew the amount of pain involved in a real whipping you wouldn't have whipping fantasies. perhaps true for you, jagged, but not for many others, including myself.

it is quite surprising to see so many postings that deride "just fantasy." it sure seems like a double standard. i bet even 3113, who laces her stories with verisimilitude, has read the occasional one.
Eh well, let it be a double standard. There's a big difference between an adult who can take part in a real whipping if they so desire, or instigate a "real" rape for themselves. We all have our limits. Mine is in imagining myself, or anyone I'm boinking, to be twelve years old. I just won't do it. *shrug* You can if you wish, Pure, and so can Riff-Raff, and Ami really needs to get himself to work on this important subject that he feels has been neglected. :rolleyes:

(As a side note, as a top I tend to call my bottoms "little girl" or "boy" and I get called "daddy" more often than not. Wierdly (now that I think of it), the inference of incest has never come up. It's a job description, or something...
 
(As a side note, as a top I tend to call my bottoms "little girl" or "boy" and I get called "daddy" more often than not. Wierdly (now that I think of it), the inference of incest has never come up. It's a job description, or something...

Make them call you 'Patriarch'... but personally, I don't think it works as Daddy or Papi.
 
Back
Top