Approval ratings...

Lets keep in mind, AI is not a good source at this time.

That said, has she made mistakes? I do not doubt she has or any of the ones you listed that AI conjured.
But all that said, has she been sued for lying to the tune of 787 million dollars?
Not yet to my knowledge...though I bet you could force an AI engine to spit it out for your narrative.
The fact is she was a prime factor in the fall of MSNBC. She was way overpaid and has since taken a pay cut to work at MS NOW. Here is the main reason MSNBC collapsed its total‑day viewers and key‑demo numbers dropped: some recent months show MSNBC with 492,000 total‑day viewers and just ~41,000 in the 25–54 demo. Adweek
 
The fact is she was a prime factor in the fall of MSNBC. She was way overpaid and has since taken a pay cut to work at MS NOW. Here is the main reason MSNBC collapsed its total‑day viewers and key‑demo numbers dropped: some recent months show MSNBC with 492,000 total‑day viewers and just ~41,000 in the 25–54 demo. Adweek
so in your mind, total number of viewers means its more reputable and better?

by that account...something like jurassic park 22 or whatever they were up to...is a better film than say...shawshank redemption?
or if you would prefer to stick to television, some schlock like friends is a better show than say, better call saul
 
I clicked on each of those. The first two said nothing about the Electoral College. The third acknowledged, "A victory by Mr. Trump remains possible"
The fact is, there was complete confidence in the legacy media on Clinton winning with big numbers, mainly because they believed their own BS and had completely tuned out the American people. They did the same thing with this last election. Every Democrat was totally surprised by reality because they lived in a different political universe.
 
The fact is, there was complete confidence in the legacy media on Clinton winning with big numbers, mainly because they believed their own BS and had completely tuned out the American people. They did the same thing with this last election. Every Democrat was totally surprised by reality because they lived in a different political universe.
I think evey American that vited for Kamala or against Trump etc, had high hopes because of her momentum and the change from Biden and fooled themselves into believing it could/should happen
 
so in your mind, total number of viewers means its more reputable and better?

by that account...something like jurassic park 22 or whatever they were up to...is a better film than say...shawshank redemption?
or if you would prefer to stick to television, some schlock like friends is a better show than say, better call saul
Not at all, total viewers don’t automatically equal quality or reputation. Popularity and artistic merit often run on completely different tracks. Jurassic Park 22 might rake in the box office bucks, but that doesn’t make it a cinematic masterpiece like Shawshank Redemption. Similarly, Friends may have been a cultural phenomenon with massive viewership, but Better Call Saul is widely praised for its storytelling and depth.

When I mention ratings, it’s about influence, reach, and business viability, not a judgment on quality. Both matter, but they’re measuring very different things.
 
I think evey American that vited for Kamala or against Trump etc, had high hopes because of her momentum and the change from Biden and fooled themselves into believing it could/should happen
Absolutely, many Americans who voted for Kamala or against Trump did so fueled by hope and the momentum of change. A big part of that was the heavy reliance on the anti-Trump legacy media, which often painted an overly optimistic picture and framed the narrative in ways that encouraged those expectations. Unfortunately, when reality didn’t match the hype, it led to widespread disappointment, and deeper cynicism. It shows why it’s crucial to look beyond media spin and hold party leaders like Kamal accountable for actual results, not just promises or media-driven momentum.
 
The fact is, there was complete confidence in the legacy media on Clinton winning with big numbers, mainly because they believed their own BS and had completely tuned out the American people. They did the same thing with this last election. Every Democrat was totally surprised by reality because they lived in a different political universe.
Elections were held in the United States on November 4, 2025. The off-year election included gubernatorial and state legislative elections in a few states, as well as numerous mayoral races and a variety of other local offices on the ballot. Special elections to the United States Congress for newly vacant seats also took place.

In what was widely described as a "blue wave" election, Democrats both flipped the governorship of Virginia and held onto the governorship of New Jersey by landslide margins, flipped 13 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates, flipped 5 seats in the New Jersey General Assembly (reaching a super majority in the chamber), scored a decisive redistricting referendum victory in California, and won several other down-ballot statewide races in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Georgia. In New York City, Democrat and self-identified democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani won a three-way race in the mayoral election.

Democratic success in this election was driven by widespread concern over the economy. Voters felt that President Donald Trump was failing to deliver on his 2024 campaign promises of economic renewal from the 2021–2023 inflation surge. Many voters also felt that Trump’s sweeping tariffs were worsening the state of the economy.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_elections
 
Elections were held in the United States on November 4, 2025. The off-year election included gubernatorial and state legislative elections in a few states, as well as numerous mayoral races and a variety of other local offices on the ballot. Special elections to the United States Congress for newly vacant seats also took place.

In what was widely described as a "blue wave" election, Democrats both flipped the governorship of Virginia and held onto the governorship of New Jersey by landslide margins, flipped 13 seats in the Virginia House of Delegates, flipped 5 seats in the New Jersey General Assembly (reaching a super majority in the chamber), scored a decisive redistricting referendum victory in California, and won several other down-ballot statewide races in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Georgia. In New York City, Democrat and self-identified democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani won a three-way race in the mayoral election.

Democratic success in this election was driven by widespread concern over the economy. Voters felt that President Donald Trump was failing to deliver on his 2024 campaign promises of economic renewal from the 2021–2023 inflation surge. Many voters also felt that Trump’s sweeping tariffs were worsening the state of the economy.[1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_United_States_elections
Much of it in deep blue areas.
 
Not at all, total viewers don’t automatically equal quality or reputation. Popularity and artistic merit often run on completely different tracks. Jurassic Park 22 might rake in the box office bucks, but that doesn’t make it a cinematic masterpiece like Shawshank Redemption. Similarly, Friends may have been a cultural phenomenon with massive viewership, but Better Call Saul is widely praised for its storytelling and depth.

When I mention ratings, it’s about influence, reach, and business viability, not a judgment on quality. Both matter, but they’re measuring very different things.
That’s a point the liberals will never understand. They can make all the buxom blonde running from dinosaurs they want but it will never equal the quality about a bunch of men together in prison.
 
That’s a point the liberals will never understand. They can make all the buxom blonde running from dinosaurs they want but it will never equal the quality about a bunch of men together in prison.
the movie everyone loves to pretend they saw before it became a cult classic on cable TV. It’s basically the cinematic version of a motivational poster: hope, friendship, and a dude digging his way out of jail with a rock hammer, but watching paint dry would have been a quicker escape plan.
 
I do not remember any polling agency that said Hillary would win by a landslide. They said she would win the popular vote, and she did.

It was the vibe and you guys got Rekt....and it literlaly traumatized half the nation into backing Jihadis and socialist to just tear the fuckin' place down. If they can't exploit America, they'll burn it down....
 
It was the vibe and you guys got Rekt....and it literlaly traumatized half the nation into backing Jihadis and socialist to just tear the fuckin' place down. If they can't exploit America, they'll burn it down....
^^^^Says the anchor baby who collects welfare and will soon be deported.
 
The poll LilKitKat shared was conducted by Gallup, one of the oldest and most respected polling firms in the business. They don’t just randomly call people on landlines. They use modern sampling technologies and statistical models. More importantly, the results are consistent with many other polls from major polling firms. Realclear Politics runs rolling averages of all the major polling companies and their current average for Trump are in the same ballpark as Gallup.

There’s no question Trump’s approval numbers suck overall and on key issues. This is not unusual for presidents at this stage in their second terms. The RCP average has Trump in the same range as the two most recent presidents who served two terms (Bush and Obama) as of December 5th in the first year of their second terms. Their numbers sucked as well.

Low presidential approval ratings usually benefit the party out of the White House in midterm elections. Dems have good reason to be optimistic about next year’s midterms.

1765057960006.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 1765057878765.png
    1765057878765.png
    633.2 KB · Views: 0
It wasn't a FOX poll... Real Clear Politics 42.9%
RCP simply averages out the results of other companies' polls, with no weighting for sample size, each pollster's track record, or any of a long list of other factors that can make a big difference. Their numbers are worth nothing.
 
RCP simply averages out the results of other companies' polls, with no weighting for sample size, each pollster's track record, or any of a long list of other factors that can make a big difference. Their numbers are worth nothing.
Trump is in the same range as Obama and Biden
 
RCP simply averages out the results of other companies' polls, with no weighting for sample size, each pollster's track record, or any of a long list of other factors that can make a big difference. Their numbers are worth nothing.
That’s correct. There are occasional outliers that can temporarily impact the RCP averages in one direction or the other. However, the polls they include are generally made up of polls by major firms that run polls for ABC, CBS, CNN, Fox News, NBC, NYT, WSJ, WaPo, etc. And there are usually multiple presidential approval tracking polls conducted on an ongoing basis.

Long way of saying the poll posted by the OP aligns with all the major polls. There’s no doubt in my mind that Trump is in the same quandary his predecessors were at this stage of his second term.
 
The party that nominated Trump is still nominating crooks, morons, and puppets for many offices. Trump's approval rating could be on the ceiling and the Pubs still lose seats by pouring oatmeal into suits and putting them on the ballot.
 
I wouldn't be bragging about that if I were a Trump supporter.

And imagine if common MAGAts like ineedhelp1 gave an honest opinion of DonOld’s policies, performance, and behavior. DonOld’s approval rating would be in the teens - the same as the age of the girls DonOld & Jeffrey Epstein exploited.

😳

That goes opposite for the common MAGAts’ opinion of President Obama & President Biden who they pilloried without justification.

😳

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Back
Top