Venezuela

There are even fuckwits who think that someone must be a LGBT communist because they know someone who once went to a fancy dress party in a Scooby Doo dog costume, and follow the well-known Communist Nick Fuentes and love the all-time great Communist called Adolf Hitler.

These people think they are sane enough to be allowed to vote and possess firearms. No wonder the US is a dangerous place.
The US exists for real?
I always thought they are a special fever dream section of the adult theme part of Walt Disney World.
We live and learn.
 
Obama did not lie and blame his military personnel when kinetic actions he ordered resulted in unnecessary killing.
Neither did Hegseth or Trump, They both backed the actions the military took 100% up and down the chain of command.

Was it an unnecessary killing? He/they were American citizens hanging with terrorist.
He admitted problems and emphasized the need to establish and maintain "guard rails" for these strikes.
Obama guardrail, PPG *classified*

Continuing imminent threat; Lethal force could only be used against targets who posed a *continuing imminent threat to Americans and could not feasibly be captured.*

The threat was a boatload of drugs not yet sunk.
The Bonespur Pig and Hegseth are throwing the Admiral under the bus in case there is war crime accountability, but they are also saying unnecessary killing in these strikes is perfectly fine.
They didn't, both are standing in solidarity.
Big difference, MAGAt. But you don't have a clue about why it is important for a President to have moral character.
Please don't preach moral character to us. The Biden admin was the most vile, insidious and corrupt administration ever. Democrats protected, at the risk of our national security, an individual that was obviously cognitively challenged and you Democrats didn't care.
 
Last edited:
Here's some history for the retarded left:


Obama Paved the Way for Trump’s Venezuelan Killings​

By Jim on December 3, 2025

On February 3, 2010, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair stunned Washington by announcing that the administration was also targeting Americans for killing. Blair revealed to a congressional committee the new standard for extrajudicial killings: “Whether that American is involved in a group that is trying to attack us, whether that American has—is a threat to other Americans. We don’t target people for free speech. We target them for taking action that threatens Americans.”

But “involved” is a vague standard—as is “action that threatens Americans.” Blair stated that “if we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that.” Permission from who?

Obama’s first high-profile American target was Anwar Awlaki, a cleric born in New Mexico. After the 9/11 attacks, Awlaki was showcased as a model moderate Muslim. The New York Times noted that Awlaki “gave interviews to the national news media, preached at the Capitol in Washington and attended a breakfast with Pentagon officials.” He became more radical after he concluded that the Geoge W. Bush administration’s Global War on Terror was actually a war on Islam. After the FBI sought to squeeze him into becoming an informant against other Muslims, Awlaki fled the country. He arrived in Yemen and was arrested and reportedly tortured at the behest of the U.S. government. After he was released from prison eighteen months later, his attitude had worsened and his sermons became more bloodthirsty.

After the Obama administration announced plans to kill Awlaki, his father hired a lawyer to file a challenge in federal court. The ACLU joined the lawsuit, seeking to compel the government “to disclose the legal standard it uses to place U.S. citizens on government kill lists.” The Obama administration labeled the entire case a “State Secret.” This meant that the administration did not even have to explain why federal law no longer constrained its killings. The administration could have indicted Awlaki on numerous charges but it did not want to provide him any traction in federal court.

In September 2010, The New York Times reported that “there is widespread agreement among the administration’s legal team that it is lawful for President Obama to authorize the killing of someone like Mr. Awlaki.”
It was comforting to know that top political appointees concurred that Obama could justifiably kill Americans. But that was the same “legal standard” the Bush team used to justify torture.

The Obama administration asserted a right to kill U.S. citizens without trial, without notice, and without any chance for the marked men to legally object. In November 2010, Justice Department attorney Douglas Letter announced in federal court that no judge had legal authority to be “looking over the shoulder” of Obama’s targeted killing. Letter declared that the program involves “the very core powers of the president as commander in chief.”

Much more here: https://jimbovard.com/blog/2025/12/03/obama-paved-the-way-for-trumps-venezuelan-killings/

Let the bed wetting begin.
 
Here's some history for the retarded left:


Obama Paved the Way for Trump’s Venezuelan Killings​

By Jim on December 3, 2025

On February 3, 2010, Obama’s Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair stunned Washington by announcing that the administration was also targeting Americans for killing. Blair revealed to a congressional committee the new standard for extrajudicial killings: “Whether that American is involved in a group that is trying to attack us, whether that American has—is a threat to other Americans. We don’t target people for free speech. We target them for taking action that threatens Americans.”

But “involved” is a vague standard—as is “action that threatens Americans.” Blair stated that “if we think that direct action will involve killing an American, we get specific permission to do that.” Permission from who?

Obama’s first high-profile American target was Anwar Awlaki, a cleric born in New Mexico. After the 9/11 attacks, Awlaki was showcased as a model moderate Muslim. The New York Times noted that Awlaki “gave interviews to the national news media, preached at the Capitol in Washington and attended a breakfast with Pentagon officials.” He became more radical after he concluded that the Geoge W. Bush administration’s Global War on Terror was actually a war on Islam. After the FBI sought to squeeze him into becoming an informant against other Muslims, Awlaki fled the country. He arrived in Yemen and was arrested and reportedly tortured at the behest of the U.S. government. After he was released from prison eighteen months later, his attitude had worsened and his sermons became more bloodthirsty.

After the Obama administration announced plans to kill Awlaki, his father hired a lawyer to file a challenge in federal court. The ACLU joined the lawsuit, seeking to compel the government “to disclose the legal standard it uses to place U.S. citizens on government kill lists.” The Obama administration labeled the entire case a “State Secret.” This meant that the administration did not even have to explain why federal law no longer constrained its killings. The administration could have indicted Awlaki on numerous charges but it did not want to provide him any traction in federal court.

In September 2010, The New York Times reported that “there is widespread agreement among the administration’s legal team that it is lawful for President Obama to authorize the killing of someone like Mr. Awlaki.” It was comforting to know that top political appointees concurred that Obama could justifiably kill Americans. But that was the same “legal standard” the Bush team used to justify torture.

The Obama administration asserted a right to kill U.S. citizens without trial, without notice, and without any chance for the marked men to legally object. In November 2010, Justice Department attorney Douglas Letter announced in federal court that no judge had legal authority to be “looking over the shoulder” of Obama’s targeted killing. Letter declared that the program involves “the very core powers of the president as commander in chief.”

Much more here: https://jimbovard.com/blog/2025/12/03/obama-paved-the-way-for-trumps-venezuelan-killings/
Lol

O
D
S
 
You bring up Obama, Hilary, and Joe every single time you attempt to defend the pedo felon.

You're a hypocritical disingenuous traitor.
Of course, he has to bring up Obama, Hillary, and Joe every time, since they’re considered by some to be the most dangerous and traitorous figures we’ve ever had in government. Instead of focusing on complaints about Trump, share one positive thing that any of those three have accomplished. And you want to talk about a broken record, that's you. You keep calling Trump a pedo. When Obama is gay and Biden showered with his daughter. You need to grow a brain.
 
You bring up Obama, Hilary, and Joe every single time you attempt to defend the pedo felon.

You're a hypocritical disingenuous traitor.
Because you accuse Trump of the very things your favorite reprobates have done in the past. The hypocrisy has to be pointed out to you fucking dumbasses.
 
Because you accuse Trump of the very things your favorite reprobates have done in the past. The hypocrisy has to be pointed out to you fucking dumbasses.
There is zero comparison, traitor.

Trump was bffs with Epstein and owned children's beauty pageants.

He's committing war crimes.
 
Ok dummy, consider that these drug smuggling criminals with guns forced innocents to load and or operate the boat?

Many low level drug mules are pressed into service by the cartels.

Also:

Those boats may also be in the business of human trafficking, so some innocent victims might be on board for that reason as well.

And that ^ is why you interdict whenever possible rather than just blowing people up.

And that ^ is why the comparisons between what DonOld & Whiskey Pete Kegsbreath are doing to what President Obama did with drone strikes on ACTUAL terrorist COMBATANTS in INACCESSIBLE areas are ridiculous.

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Ok dummy, consider that these drug smuggling criminals with guns forced innocents to load and or operate the boat?
Intel tells a different story. Hegseth and military intelligence have asserted that US intel and commanders knew exactly who and what was on the boat before the strikes.
 
The fact is, the right of the President to act alone in the national security interest of the United States goes back as far a Thomas Jefferson and the doctrine of doing so in this hemisphere goes back to Monroe.
Congress declares war
senate approves treaties

MOST IMPORTANT: Congress sets budget (wars expensive)

Feel free to read Constitution
 
Intel tells a different story. Hegseth and military intelligence have asserted that US intel and commanders knew exactly who and what was on the boat before the strikes.
Trump didn't even know why he had an MRI the other day but claims it was "perfect."

He also said he was able to see the blood explode from the fishermen. Which is impossible.

He also double tapped a sinking vessel, committing war crimes.

How much bullshit do you have to swallow from this bullshit administration before your belly is full?
 
Intel tells a different story. Hegseth and military intelligence have asserted that US intel and commanders knew exactly who and what was on the boat before the strikes.
Yeah, sure, of course they did. US military intelligence never makes a mistake. They have never bombed the wrong target.
 
Back
Top