More Deplorable violence: Trump says he wants Democrats to be executed.

[Chadrone]

'Punishable by DEATH’: Trump Floats Execution for Democrats Who Urged Soldiers to Disobey Illegal Orders

https://www.mediaite.com/media/news...legal-orders-to-be-arrested-and-put-on-trial/

If you can't do the time....maybe don't do the crime.

Sedition is bad mmmkayyyyy

 

[Chadrone]

He’s always been a racist, ethically bankrupt piece of shit.

This is different from every lefty politician holding office how exactly???

 

[Chadrone]

When the President and senior advisors are saying out loud that it's illegal to uphold the Constitution, America has problems.

Sedition isn't upholding the Constitution.

 

[Chadrone]

So, in your opinion, anything should be allowed and possible in war. Screw the Hague Convention, screw the Declaration of Human Rights. Just kill prisoners, kill medics, kill random people on the high seas without trial.
Fine.

That's how it's been for the vast majority in every single war ever.

Let's hope that in the next war, the enemy remembers the American position you're advocating here. GI Joe surrendered? Doesn't matter. Take the shovel and beat him to death.

This is the way all war has been for American Joes......our enemies don't follow our rules taht we set for ourselves.

How are you so retarded you don't understand that??

You're a stupid asshole if you want that.

You're a stupid asshole for not understanding that's how it already is.

If you're a soldier and you get orders from an officer that amount to that, shoot him.

Soldiers don't take advice from ignorant people who clearly know fuck all about being a soldier.

 

[MajorRewrite]

That's how it's been for the vast majority in every single war ever.

This is the way all war has been for American Joes......our enemies don't follow our rules taht we set for ourselves.

How are you so retarded you don't understand that??

You're a stupid asshole for not understanding that's how it already is.

Soldiers don't take advice from ignorant people who clearly know fuck all about being a soldier.

Poor BotaniBoi is having a Saturday morning meltdown.

Crazed incel MAGA sheep are weird.

 

[jomar]

These fucking politicians who produced this video are vile, disgraced TDS laden democrats.

The statement these political hacks put forward was intended to sew confusion within the enlisted ranks and command structure of our military. It suggested that soldiers were being given illegal orders without any illegal orders being given or any examples of illegal orders given. It was a vague suggestion based on destructive political rhetoric and hatred for Trump. Those traitors were using our military as political pawns hoping to create subterfuge within the ranks. This statement was cleverly crafted as to allow plausible deniability of any seditious intent but the subliminal seed is planted. We know UCMJ is taught to our soldiers but it’s limited in scope and certainly doesn’t make our soldiers constitutional lawyers nor does it give soldiers enough knowledge of the law as to all of a sudden they become legal experts. That’s what the JAG is for. The drug boats attacks have been scrutinized by legal experts. Soldiers being deployed in our cities have been legally cleared for the duty with strict instructions on engagement. These political hacks should be expelled from congress for sedition. These seditious politicians are attempting to create confusion and divide within the chain of command which could result challenging all legal orders. Soldiers need to do their job and resist the political noise. Just believe you’ll know when an illegal order is given, they’re stark, very obvious and immoral.

Nah, it’s not even close to sedition. I don’t think it even necessarily implies that current orders are unlawful, but I do see it as a heads up that things could be moving in that direction so be forewarned and prepared.

 

[icanhelp1]

Nah, it’s not even close to sedition. I don’t think it even necessarily implies that current orders are unlawful, but I do see it as a heads up that things could be moving in that direction so be forewarned and prepared.

It doesn't imply, it's vaguely suggestive in order to create doubt and confusion within the ranks. When have you ever seen congress ever act in this manner? NEVER!!! This is purely TDS.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

No, I’m suggesting the principle of starting out with children as legitimate targets is wrong, and always will be.

Case in point.

Over 20,000 children have died in Gaza in two years. Gaza went from not registering in the lists of child amputees to now having the largest contingent in the world, in two years.

Gaza is also home to the largest contingent of amputee children with no surviving family.

When you enable the worst of us, when you make everyone a legitimate target, what you are doing is not war, but genocide.

And you using a fictional story to try and justify killing children as an ethical standard to commit war frankly sickens me. Get help.

I don’t want to wade in on this debate other than to clear up one thing…

The movie and book about Chris Kyle’s life are two separate things. The scene where he where he shoots a kid and mother Is disputed and I’m not sure why Eastwood would include that with the glaring discrepancy.

Carry on.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Are you suggesting that unlawful orders should be followed?


Attacking a boat in open waters is not legal under US and international law
Either way, Democrats didn't tell anyone to not attack boats in International waters


What pisses you off is what the President told you to be pissed about. The people who create outrage about this is evident by those who create threads in this forum about it ...and that's not me

I didn’t suggest any sort of thing and you know it.

If the attacks on the NARCO boats is illegal, your seditious lawmakers would SAY SO. For the tenth time, ask yourself WHY?

Don’t Give Up The Ship, eh El-el.

 

[OralAllOver]

Tom Homan is a criminal. Donald Trump is a criminal. What happens when criminals are handed immense power? They get rich, and innocent folks get imprisoned or killed. What could be more obvious than that?

 

[jomar]

It doesn't imply, it's vaguely suggestive in order to create doubt and confusion within the ranks.

I guess in MAGAworld, but not in the real world.

When have you ever seen congress ever act in this manner. NEVER!!! This is purely TDS.

It’s not TDS to see what’s actually happening and to remind those that serve of their duty. Having said that, I’m sure they don’t need to be reminded. As such, it’s political theater to further shine the light on and warn about trump’s ongoing authoritarian boundary pushing.

 

[ll74]

I didn’t suggest any sort of thing and you know it.

Great. Neither did they.

If the attacks on the NARCO boats is illegal, your seditious lawmakers would SAY SO. For the tenth time, ask yourself WHY?

Many have said so.

I believe they are unlawful. There is nothing that clearly suggests that they are.

 

[OralAllOver]

Geniuses:

When Nazis used "just following orders" excuse, what was the US (and others) response:
That an illegal order is not an order

So feel free to bend your illogic yet again towards fascism. Yeah, your kids will be JUST FINE.

So defend illegal orders until you are brown in the shirt

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

These fucking politicians who produced this video are vile, disgraced TDS laden democrats.

The statement these political hacks put forward was intended to sew confusion within the enlisted ranks and command structure of our military. It suggested that soldiers were being given illegal orders without any illegal orders being given or any examples of illegal orders given. It was a vague suggestion based on destructive political rhetoric and hatred for Trump. Those traitors were using our military as political pawns hoping to create subterfuge within the ranks. This statement was cleverly crafted as to allow plausible deniability of any seditious intent but the subliminal seed is planted. We know UCMJ is taught to our soldiers but it’s limited in scope and certainly doesn’t make our soldiers constitutional lawyers nor does it give soldiers enough knowledge of the law as to all of a sudden they become legal experts. That’s what the JAG is for. The drug boats attacks have been scrutinized by legal experts. Soldiers being deployed in our cities have been legally cleared for the duty with strict instructions on engagement. These political hacks should be expelled from congress for sedition. These seditious politicians are attempting to create confusion and divide within the chain of command which could result challenging all legal orders. Soldiers need to do their job and resist the political noise. Just believe you’ll know when an illegal order is given, they’re stark, very obvious and immoral.

Let’s look at what’s really going on here. It’s a tri-pronged attack.

First, Sen Slotkin. She’s a former CiA analyst and this has all the earmarks of a psyop propaganda video that she would be all too familiar with. I went back and watched it again, and sure enough, there are a ton of dog whistles and weasel words that give the six lawmakers (I’ve been saying seven) cover and plausible deniability in case a sailor were to cross the line.

She is also seen as a rising star in the Radicalized democrat party. She delivered the rebuttal to President Trumps SOTU speech and is photogenic enough to lure what’s left of the men in that disgusting party. She’s been pushed as POTUS material.

Second, AstroYoda…Mark Kelly. Another rising star and another whose name I’ve heard pushed for POTUS. He is of course a decorated Naval Aviator and Astronaut, and brings instant gravitas to any pet initiative (like Sen Slotkins vid) the Radicalized Piggies push forward.

The other collection of house and senate rabble are too inconsequential to mention other than they either served or were CIA. They’re there in a supporting role. The focus is on the two mentioned.

Third, I’m of the opinion now that I don’t think their message is aimed so much at service members. They’re just being cynically used as pawns. The message is really aimed at the general public, and the purpose is to create the false impression that Trump is such a fascist that at any moment he is likely to give orders that are blatantly unlawful, something akin to bayoneting children. They don’t really expect such orders ever to be given, but they want us to worry that they will, and therefore to trust a Radicalized democrat PIg.

I’ve said it several times. If they KNEW there were unlawful orders given, they’d be squealing full throttle. They ARE NOT! That tells you everything you need to know.

They are using a psyop campaign that a couple of their members have been trained in, and of course, the weak minded are swallowing it hook line and sinker.

 

[ll74]

Lol

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

Great. Neither did they.


Many have said so.

I believe they are unlawful. There is nothing that clearly suggests that they are.

Great. Neither did they.


Many have said so.

I believe they are unlawful. There is nothing that clearly suggests that they are.

In a way you’ve stumbled into the truth. Look at my post upstream.

Who’s this “many?” Internet Admirals like yourself? Sorry, but I’m not swayed. Let me say it again. If any illegal orders were given your six lawmakers would lay that case out clearly. They haven’t, and they won’t.

First and foremost, any order you receive from a superior officer, so long as it is military related, is presumed to be lawful. You don’t get to demand to see a legal opinion; you really don’t even get to do the theatrical, “give it to me in writing.” This is taken directly from Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice

Your seditious lawmakers and you Internet Admiral should brush up on the UCMJ. Again…you can be forgiven for not knowing this…they can not.

 

[ll74]

In a way you’ve stumbled into the truth. Look at my post upstream.

Who’s this “many?” Internet Admirals like yourself? Sorry, but I’m not swayed. Let me say it again. If any illegal orders were given your six lawmakers would lay that case out clearly. They haven’t, and they won’t.

https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject....ttps://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9kgqwnk8wo

First and foremost, any order you receive from a superior officer, so long as it is military related, is presumed to be lawful. You don’t get to demand to see a legal opinion; you really don’t even get to do the theatrical, “give it to me in writing.” This is taken directly from Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice

And so what these people are saying wouldn't apply.

As a person who makes decisions, you can decide to do whatever you want....you might be court martialed...but you can still do something different

Your seditious lawmakers and you Internet Admiral should brush up on the UCMJ. Again…you can be forgiven for not knowing this…they can not.

They aren't seditious in any sense of the (overused by maga) word.

I don't need forgiveness.... especially from you.

 

[OralAllOver]

Let’s look at what’s really going on here. It’s a tri-pronged attack.

First, Sen Slotkin. She’s a former CiA analyst and this has all the earmarks of a psyop propaganda video that she would be all too familiar with. I went back and watched it again, and sure enough, there are a ton of dog whistles and weasel words that give the six lawmakers (I’ve been saying seven) cover and plausible deniability in case a sailor were to cross the line.

She is also seen as a rising star in the Radicalized democrat party. She delivered the rebuttal to President Trumps SOTU speech and is photogenic enough to lure what’s left of the men in that disgusting party. She’s been pushed as POTUS material.

Second, AstroYoda…Mark Kelly. Another rising star and another whose name I’ve heard pushed for POTUS. He is of course a decorated Naval Aviator and Astronaut, and brings instant gravitas to any pet initiative (like Sen Slotkins vid) the Radicalized Piggies push forward.

The other collection of house and senate rabble are too inconsequential to mention other than they either served or were CIA. They’re there in a supporting role. The focus is on the two mentioned.

Third, I’m of the opinion now that I don’t think their message is aimed so much at service members. They’re just being cynically used as pawns. The message is really aimed at the general public, and the purpose is to create the false impression that Trump is such a fascist that at any moment he is likely to give orders that are blatantly unlawful, something akin to bayoneting children. They don’t really expect such orders ever to be given, but they want us to worry that they will, and therefore to trust a Radicalized democrat PIg.

I’ve said it several times. If they KNEW there were unlawful orders given, they’d be squealing full throttle. They ARE NOT! That tells you everything you need to know.

They are using a psyop campaign that a couple of their members have been trained in, and of course, the weak minded are swallowing it hook line and sinker.

Unlawful for Trump to declare emergency conditions justifying his deportation plan
He did just say everything WONDERFUL in US, right? That's kinda opposite of "emergency" right? Apart from his words the US richest in world and history-- that's an emergency?

Implying Trump follows law suggests insanity or criminality. Your children, btw, will suffer for your sins. Dictators hurt and kill own citizens first & foremost

Integrity and muscles grow with use. Maybe exercise integrity a bit

 

[OralAllOver]

Let’s look at what’s really going on here. It’s a tri-pronged attack.

First, Sen Slotkin. She’s a former CiA analyst and this has all the earmarks of a psyop propaganda video that she would be all too familiar with. I went back and watched it again, and sure enough, there are a ton of dog whistles and weasel words that give the six lawmakers (I’ve been saying seven) cover and plausible deniability in case a sailor were to cross the line.

She is also seen as a rising star in the Radicalized democrat party. She delivered the rebuttal to President Trumps SOTU speech and is photogenic enough to lure what’s left of the men in that disgusting party. She’s been pushed as POTUS material.

Second, AstroYoda…Mark Kelly. Another rising star and another whose name I’ve heard pushed for POTUS. He is of course a decorated Naval Aviator and Astronaut, and brings instant gravitas to any pet initiative (like Sen Slotkins vid) the Radicalized Piggies push forward.

The other collection of house and senate rabble are too inconsequential to mention other than they either served or were CIA. They’re there in a supporting role. The focus is on the two mentioned.

Third, I’m of the opinion now that I don’t think their message is aimed so much at service members. They’re just being cynically used as pawns. The message is really aimed at the general public, and the purpose is to create the false impression that Trump is such a fascist that at any moment he is likely to give orders that are blatantly unlawful, something akin to bayoneting children. They don’t really expect such orders ever to be given, but they want us to worry that they will, and therefore to trust a Radicalized democrat PIg.

I’ve said it several times. If they KNEW there were unlawful orders given, they’d be squealing full throttle. They ARE NOT! That tells you everything you need to know.

They are using a psyop campaign that a couple of their members have been trained in, and of course, the weak minded are swallowing it hook line and sinker.

Specify "earmarks" please? One fact?

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

https://www-bbc-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9kgqwnk8wo.amp?amp_gsa=1&amp_js_v=a9&usqp=mq331AQIUAKwASCAAgM=#amp_ct=1763825337318&amp_tf=From %1$s&aoh=17638253300524&referrer=https://www.google.com&ampshare=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd9kgqwnk8wo

And so what these people are saying wouldn't apply.

As a person who makes decisions, you can decide to do whatever you want....you might be court martialed...but you can still do something different


They aren't seditious in any sense of the (overused by maga) word.

I don't need forgiveness.... especially from you.

You might want to look up the definition of sedition.

I’ll leave the legal analysis and the consequences for their actions to the lawyers among us…I’m assuming your expertise in Maritime Law will carry the day? As I see it, there is a very thin line between irresponsible rhetoric and sedition, and these members of Congress may have crossed it.

Of course in today’s day and age, these things don’t seem to have any meaning. If they did, they’d be dealt with swiftly.

 

[OralAllOver]

Sedition isn't upholding the Constitution.

False.

 

[ll74]

You might want to look up the definition of sedition.

I know the definition.
This isn't.

I’ll leave the legal analysis and the consequences for their actions to the lawyers among us…I’m assuming your expertise in Maritime Law will carry the day? As I see it, there is a very thin line between irresponsible rhetoric and sedition, and these members of Congress may have crossed it.

They did not.

Of course in today’s day and age, these things don’t seem to have any meaning. If they did, they’d be dealt with swiftly.

Our President has set the bar for acceptable behavior.

This doesn't even register as a blip on the radar.

 

[HumpDayHoratio]

I know the definition.
This isn't.


They did not.


Our President has set the bar for acceptable behavior.

This doesn't even register as a blip on the radar.

Don’t Give Up The Ship!

Don’t quit your day job either Admiral.

 

[ll74]

Don’t Give Up The Ship!

Ala Matrix

There is no ship

Don’t quit your day job either Admiral.

Good luck on your sedition lawsuit

Also - "I'm claiming legal definitions and when someone challenges me, I'm calling out their lack of expertise even when I have none"

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Execute the pedophile president and all his enablers!