James Comey Charged.

Tell us you don't follow the news without saying you don't follow the news.

Have the charges been dismissed yet?

Didn't think so.

Also, a judge (not a magistrate) stayed the magistrate's order to produce the Grand Jury testimony.

So, no joy for either YOU or Comey.
 
Have the charges been dismissed yet?

Didn't think so.

Also, a judge (not a magistrate) stayed the magistrate's order to produce the Grand Jury testimony.

So, no joy for either YOU or Comey.

Lies, as usual.

Plenty of joy for both today. :)
 
Lies, as usual.

Plenty of joy for both today. :)

Lol. Why is it that you're such a luzer you can't do the googie BEFORE you post your crap?

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-com...und-investigative-missteps/story?id=127594703

The federal judge overseeing former FBI Director James Comey's criminal case on Monday granted a request from federal prosecutors to block a magistrate judge's order that mandated they hand over a trove of grand jury evidence to Comey's attorneys.

And of course we all know that ABC is a right wing conspiracy network and not a trustworthy source...

:ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO:
 
Have the charges been dismissed yet?

Didn't think so.

Also, a judge (not a magistrate) stayed the magistrate's order to produce the Grand Jury testimony.

So, no joy for either YOU or Comey.
Why do you do this to yourself?
 
if you ain't cheating, you ain't trying!

1000033779.jpg

this garbage admin caught lying again
 
Oh it’s aging fine, ā€œjudge blasts prosecutor for profound misstepsā€. I think that was the last headline I saw. šŸ™„ you idiots really need better hobbies.

Lol. Did you even read the original post? You know, the one about how it was on the fast track to dismissal?

A dismissal that hasn't happened yet, fast track or not.
 
if you ain't cheating, you ain't trying!

View attachment 2578475

this garbage admin caught lying again

AND...... once again you engage in a slight editing of the truth.

The MAGISTRATE wrote that as part of his order releasing the Grand Jury information. You know THE SAME Magistrate's order that his supervising judge just BLOCKED.

Anyone wanna take a guess as to why?
 
And you think that’s what’s happening?

dudly, you and the rest of the liberal Left are engaging in "We've got him now!!!" once again. You're lying to yourselves in your efforts to make things seem like they're going your way.

They're not.

You know why?

Because if the Grand Jury evidence is released, the only thing the Defense can do with it is make a motion to dismiss (which they've already done). Any argument as to the accuracy of the evidence is a matter for the jury to decide - ie; it has to go to trial. Thus, the ONLY thing the defense can do is somehow show the Grand Jury came to the verdict they agreed to was because of some sort of improper conduct BY THE GRAND JURY MEMBERS THEMSELVES, not the prosecutor or the witnesses or the evidence.

The defense complaining that this case is politically motivated isn't going to overcome a GJ indictment without something to show the GJ ITSELF was politically motivated to indict.

Good luck with that.

Have a great day coping and seething.
 
i wish there was a lawyer here who was up to speed on politics. if you know one, will you please send them an invite?

Why should I save you the fun and joy of searching for your pro bono lawyer yourself instead of leaving you to suffer through your personal problems alone?

I mean, it's not like you're ever going to pay for solutions to your failings...
 
Why should I save you the fun and joy of searching for your pro bono lawyer yourself instead of leaving you to suffer through your personal problems alone?

I mean, it's not like you're ever going to pay for solutions to your failings...
because it's way more fun to make fun of you and your dumbfuckery.
 
dudly, you and the rest of the liberal Left are engaging in "We've got him now!!!" once again. You're lying to yourselves in your efforts to make things seem like they're going your way.

They're not.

You know why?

Because if the Grand Jury evidence is released, the only thing the Defense can do with it is make a motion to dismiss (which they've already done). Any argument as to the accuracy of the evidence is a matter for the jury to decide - ie; it has to go to trial. Thus, the ONLY thing the defense can do is somehow show the Grand Jury came to the verdict they agreed to was because of some sort of improper conduct BY THE GRAND JURY MEMBERS THEMSELVES, not the prosecutor or the witnesses or the evidence.

The defense complaining that this case is politically motivated isn't going to overcome a GJ indictment without something to show the GJ ITSELF was politically motivated to indict.

Good luck with that.

Have a great day coping and seething.
Standing in line waiting for the kool aid tonight.
 
Back
Top