Liberal Women are Unhappy

The sad, ironic thing is, the actual airhead, Barbie types that Rightguide so desires, would probably not find a fat, basement dwelling incel like himself to be the least bit attractive.

Nor would they find a fat, balding Russian apartment dwelling Russian Bot to be the least bit attractive.
 
My cat is dead.
Why would I use arguments, why would I even pretend that I exchange arguments with you?
You don't accept arguments apart from your own. And they are irregular and not logical.
You are not worth my time. Or the time of anyone else.
It's you who lacks logic. You're angry and emotional, not logical. You pirouette on the stage of discourse, twirling ribbons of colored feelings, while here, reason sits in the wings, patiently polishing its glasses, waiting for the storm of emotion to settle so it can finally get a clear view of the mess you left behind.

I don't claim a value of anyone's time, but I notice you're quick to seek me out.
 
George Orwell from 1984:

“It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and the nosers-out of unorthodoxy."
They voted 80% in New York for the Communist Mamdani.
 
Good for you, sucking it up. 👍
When so many warnings of disaster go unheeded, sadness eventually gives way to a quiet clarity. You stop mourning the deafness of others and start conserving your breath. There’s a strange calm in knowing you spoke the truth, even if no one listened, I feel the serenity of a lighthouse that keeps shining, not because the ships will all be saved, but because that’s what it was built to do.;)
 
When so many warnings of disaster go unheeded, sadness eventually gives way to a quiet clarity. You stop mourning the deafness of others and start conserving your breath. There’s a strange calm in knowing you spoke the truth, even if no one listened, I feel the serenity of a lighthouse that keeps shining, not because the ships will all be saved, but because that’s what it was built to do.
Neat!

Stay triggered my friend 👍
 
Tell us more about Mandani...maybe create another thread about him. 👍
When he attempts to start seizing private property I may start another but now it's an issue we cannot allow Democrats to escape. They made that bed and now they will have to sleep in it.
 
When he attempts to start seizing private property I may start another but now it's an issue we cannot allow Democrats to escape. They made that bed and now they will have to sleep in it.
And the fire and the brimstone and muslims taking over the world!!!!!!!!

Lol ..should be fun to see
 
And the fire and the brimstone and muslims taking over the world!!!!!!!!

Lol ..should be fun to see
It's a serious matter. They cannot assimilate. Islam is at odds with the Christian principles that Western Civilization is founded on. This insurgency will manifest itself here just as it has in Europe.


News​

The official results are in: Germany’s ‘Muslim Miracle’ was a catastrophic failure…​

November 7, 2025 (a day ago)

https://revolver.news/2025/11/the-o...ys-muslim-miracle-was-a-catastrophic-failure/
 
It's a serious matter. They cannot assimilate. Islam is at odds with the Christian principles that Western Civilization is founded on. This insurgency will manifest itself here just as it has in Europe.


News​

The official results are in: Germany’s ‘Muslim Miracle’ was a catastrophic failure…​

November 7, 2025 (a day ago)

https://revolver.news/2025/11/the-o...ys-muslim-miracle-was-a-catastrophic-failure/
Yes, the histrionics is very serious.

You are obviously seeking a Constitutional Amendment to ban Islam in our country
Good luck!

Sidenote: Mandani isn't creating a theocracy, as it's against the Constitution.
 
It's a serious matter. They cannot assimilate. Islam is at odds with the Christian principles that Western Civilization is founded on. This insurgency will manifest itself here just as it has in Europe.


News​

The official results are in: Germany’s ‘Muslim Miracle’ was a catastrophic failure…​

November 7, 2025 (a day ago)

https://revolver.news/2025/11/the-o...ys-muslim-miracle-was-a-catastrophic-failure/
Don't you support raising the retirement age as high as possible anyway?
 
Hel_Books said:
Actually, it's more likely women are repelled by the men who think the 19th Amendment was a bad idea.

Not the point. Women who spend their prime childbearing years pursuing education, careers, or casual relationships often find themselves less desirable to men seeking to start a family than younger, more traditionally feminine women. The dreaded 30-35 “biological wall” stands as a harsh reality check, forcing many women to confront the shrinking window for marriage and motherhood.
Indeed so! The solution, of course, is to provide women more support, have men take on more responsibility for child-rearing.

Or are you one of those troglodytes who think women shouldn't have careers? Or maybe shouldn't even be able to vote?
 
Indeed so! The solution, of course, is to provide women more support, have men take on more responsibility for child-rearing.

Or are you one of those troglodytes who think women shouldn't have careers? Or maybe shouldn't even be able to vote?
He is.
 
Indeed so! The solution, of course, is to provide women more support, have men take on more responsibility for child-rearing.

Or are you one of those troglodytes who think women shouldn't have careers? Or maybe shouldn't even be able to vote?
If a woman’s priority is a career, she shouldn’t pretend motherhood is still on the table. Men who want wives to bear children and build a home aren’t looking for business partners, they’re looking for women who value family over ambition. The modern obsession with careers and independence has driven marriage rates to historic lows, leaving countless men disinterested in the modern American woman. So men have adapted, walking alone or seeking wives in saner pastures, where womanhood isn't defined as a corporate career path.

PS: With 80+% of women in NYC voting for a Communist maybe we do have to reexamine qualifications for suffrage.
 
Hel_Books said:
Indeed so! The solution, of course, is to provide women more support, have men take on more responsibility for child-rearing.

Or are you one of those troglodytes who think women shouldn't have careers? Or maybe shouldn't even be able to vote?

If a woman’s priority is a career, she shouldn’t pretend motherhood is still on the table. . .
Why not? Margaret Thatcher, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Vera Wang, Gal Gadot and many others had children and careers. If your society were to provide support for both male and female parents, not only would you have plenty of women with the opportunity for careers, you might also get that boost in fertility that your country seems to need right about now.

Cutting services for the people (male or female) you want to bring up the next generation seems rather foolish, no?
 
Why not? Margaret Thatcher, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Vera Wang, Gal Gadot and many others had children and careers. If your society were to provide support for both male and female parents, not only would you have plenty of women with the opportunity for careers, you might also get that boost in fertility that your country seems to need right about now.

Cutting services for the people (male or female) you want to bring up the next generation seems rather foolish, no?

What next generation? There is no next generation after abortion.
 
If a woman’s priority is a career, she shouldn’t pretend motherhood is still on the table. Men who want wives to bear children and build a home aren’t looking for business partners, they’re looking for women who value family over ambition. The modern obsession with careers and independence has driven marriage rates to historic lows, leaving countless men disinterested in the modern American woman. So men have adapted, walking alone or seeking wives in saner pastures, where womanhood isn't defined as a corporate career path.

PS: With 80+% of women in NYC voting for a Communist maybe we do have to reexamine qualifications for suffrage.
Yet again, rights for those reich guide agrees with, and take them away from those who don’t.
 
Why not? Margaret Thatcher, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Vera Wang, Gal Gadot and many others had children and careers. If your society were to provide support for both male and female parents, not only would you have plenty of women with the opportunity for careers, you might also get that boost in fertility that your country seems to need right about now.
How many time do I have to say it? If a woman’s dream is to climb the corporate ladder, she shouldn’t act surprised when no man wants to carry her over a threshold. Men who want wives and families aren’t impressed by resumes or corner offices. They want women who nurture, not negotiate. The modern woman cannot trade her femininity for ambition, her fertility for credentials, and then wonder why she lives alone and the cradle stays empty. You see it's really up to what men want and when women trade their womb for a workspace they make a choice that precludes qualities that men desire in a wife. After she chooses this path and she turns thirty-five, staring into the mirror’s quiet betrayal, she’ll ask where all the good men went. The answer will echo from the silence her journey helped to create.

Please understand. I'm not saying that women have no right to seek a career path or numerous social arrangements with other men. All that I'm saying is this path in life has consequences if the woman decides she wants to settle down with a man at the end of her child bearing years if that man wants to start a family, which is about 95% of what might drive a man to get married.
 
Back
Top