Western Civilization Depends On Men And Masculinity

[Meekly_Anna]

Haha, you're so funny. You're so black and white. This made me laugh out loud. I am middle class white woman and I hate other women. Like, why would a man want to be a woman? We have to sit to pee. I cannot fathom why anyone would willingly give up their ability to pee standing up just so they can wear fake boobs and dresses. My mother was deeply abusive and while I've had plenty of abusive bfs in the past, none have come close to what my own mother put me through so I'm a white middle class woman hating woman. where do I fit into your black and white narrative there? thanks for the laugh. I'm gonna go worship my husband's cock now. XD

You are too harsh.
Try wearing a skirt then you can pee while standing. In France they had, still have at some places, these fancy toilets which are basically a ceramic plate with a hole in the middle. Just stand over it and let it flow. Don't wear panties or aim well.

 

[HisArpy]

You are too harsh.
Try wearing a skirt then you can pee while standing. In France they had, still have at some places, these fancy toilets which are basically a ceramic plate with a hole in the middle. Just stand over it and let it flow. Don't wear panties or aim well.

Wait! A skirt? What happened to equality where women could wear pants if they felt like it?

Sounds to me that you're trying to make women into second class citizens where their only choices are to wear a dress and be pretty so they can cater to men.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Dude?

The dinosaurs weren't contemporaneous with humans. Or are you one of those "creationists"?

As for marauding animal predators, remember it was technology, like fire, spear, bow and arrow that let humans bring down mammoths or sabre-tooth tigers, not bare-knuckle brawling!

Yes, tools created and used by MEN against all comers; human or animal.

Your lack of knowledge about dinosaurs leads me to suspect you're equally ignorant on the subject of who invented (for example) the knapped flint knife!

In fact, considering, as I'm sure you would, that fine hand-work (lace-making) is more stereotypically female (than, say, blacksmithing) it would make sense to say the art of making such things as arrowheads and flint knives was devised by women. And as for fire, well, just think vestal virgins!

 

[Hel_Books]

Wait! A skirt? What happened to equality where women could wear pants if they felt like it?

Sounds to me that you're trying to make women into second class citizens where their only choices are to wear a dress and be pretty so they can cater to men.

That would make more sense if only you were wearing the right tartan!

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Wait! A skirt? What happened to equality where women could wear pants if they felt like it?

Sounds to me that you're trying to make women into second class citizens where their only choices are to wear a dress and be pretty so they can cater to men.

Idiot.
In your opinion, the hairy, whisky-drinking Scotsmen who let their splendour swing freely under their kilts are rather girlish, aren't they?
Idiot, as I said.

 

[HisArpy]

Women needed laws to overcome laws that men made that made them unequal. So did black people.

No one created a law which makes women weaker physically than men. Unless you want to talk about the laws of nature. Over which mankind has no dominion or ability to change.

Society was built by men because at the time society was created brute strength was the fuel used to forge the rules under which men would live in peace. Strength women couldn't bring to the table and still cannot because nature created them for a different purpose/role and equipped them for that purpose at the expense of physical strength.

Even today, brute strength is the glue that holds civilization together. Force of arms, physical ability for tough jobs extracting the resources civilization needs, and so on.

Everything rests on that pillar of strength.

 

[HisArpy]

Idiot.
In your opinion, the hairy, whisky-drinking Scotsmen who let their splendour swing freely under their kilts are rather girlish, aren't they?
Idiot, as I said.

An exception is not the rule.

 

[HisArpy]

That would make more sense if only you were wearing the right tartan!

So you would put men in skirts to prove equality?

WTF dudly, are you insane or just insanely stupid?

 

[Philthy_Phil]

Wait! A skirt? What happened to equality where women could wear pants if they felt like it?

Sounds to me that you're trying to make women into second class citizens where their only choices are to wear a dress and be pretty so they can cater to men.

This is a thread about masculinity and men, not about effiminate faggot wanna be writers in wheelchairs. Please go away.

 

[HisArpy]

Your lack of knowledge about dinosaurs leads me to suspect you're equally ignorant on the subject of who invented (for example) the knapped flint knife!

In fact, considering, as I'm sure you would, that fine hand-work (lace-making) is more stereotypically female (than, say, blacksmithing) it would make sense to say the art of making such things as arrowheads and flint knives was devised by women. And as for fire, well, just think vestal virgins!

Using the tools of civilization isn't the same as CREATING civilization.

 

[ll74]

No one created a law which makes women weaker physically than men.

I didn't say that.
I'm talking about our country (and others) who have created laws making them less of a person.

But you grunt about your masculinity as needed

I find it odd that you dipshits need multiple threads to throw your cock on the table and prove your dominance, ....I know this won't be the last.

For such masculine men, you all seem to need validation more often than most human beings.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

An exception is not the rule.

I think the Scots will totally agree that they are exceptional.

Idiot.
By the way the Tamil wear something similar.

 

[Hel_Books]

Society was built by men because at the time society was created brute strength was the fuel used to forge the rules under which men would live in peace.

Don't be silly. "Society" rests on the idea that brute strength is NOT what rules, but rather the law. (Otherwise those Big Bad Black men you stereotype as criminals would be the ones in charge, not you!)

Your attitude is that of weirdos filling their garages with firearms because when society falls brute strength (or firepower) is all there will be. You're pro-anarchy, not pro-society, snowflake!

 

[HisArpy]

Don't be silly. "Society" rests on the idea that brute strength is NOT what rules, but rather the law. (Otherwise those Big Bad Black men you stereotype as criminals would be the ones in charge, not you!)

Your attitude is that of weirdos filling their garages with firearms because when society falls brute strength (or firepower) is all there will be. You're pro-anarchy, not pro-society, snowflake!

How do you make sure everyone obeys the law?

 

[Hel_Books]

I think the Scots will totally agree that they are exceptional.

Idiot.
By the way the Tamil wear something similar.

For centuries the powerful Chinese empires were ruled by men wearing gowns.

And don't forget the "Order of the Garter" was so named because . . . those heroic men wore garters!

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Don't be silly. "Society" rests on the idea that brute strength is NOT what rules, but rather the law. (Otherwise those Big Bad Black men you stereotype as criminals would be the ones in charge, not you!)

Your attitude is that of weirdos filling their garages with firearms because when society falls brute strength (or firepower) is all there will be. You're pro-anarchy, not pro-society, snowflake!

How do you make sure everyone obeys the law?

We can see the example in your country where the big, muscular men are the problem, not the law enforcement solution!

 

[HisArpy]

I didn't say that.
I'm talking about our country (and others) who have created laws making them less of a person.

But you grunt about your masculinity as needed

I find it odd that you dipshits need multiple threads to throw your cock on the table and prove your dominance, ....I know this won't be the last.

For such masculine men, you all seem to need validation more often than most human beings.

Civilization is the topic, not how civilization operates and what restrictions it places on people.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

For centuries the powerful Chinese empires were ruled by men wearing gowns.

And don't forget the "Order of the Garter" was so named because . . . those heroic men wore garters!

They did.
A garter is a strap to fasten parts of the armour.
Languages and meanings change over time.

 

[HisArpy]

For centuries the powerful Chinese empires were ruled by men wearing gowns.

And don't forget the "Order of the Garter" was so named because . . . those heroic men wore garters!

You seem to believe that the dress makes the man. Which makes me wonder how you view the Roman Toga.

 

[HisArpy]

I think the Scots will totally agree that they are exceptional.

Idiot.
By the way the Tamil wear something similar.

The Romans wore togas on the street but competed in their Olympic games naked.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
For centuries the powerful Chinese empires were ruled by men wearing gowns.

And don't forget the "Order of the Garter" was so named because . . . those heroic men wore stockings!

You seem to believe that the dress makes the man. Which makes me wonder how you view the Roman Toga.

I'd like to see you questioning the masculinity of, say, Cicero or Vespasian!

 

[HisArpy]

We can see the example in your country where the big, muscular men are the problem, not the law enforcement solution!

So how do you make those big muscular men not be what you believe to be the problem?

 

[ll74]

Civilization is the topic, not how civilization operates and what restrictions it places on people.

Yes, obviously civilizations exist beyond laws

Modern civilizations exist and are guided by technology and laws. If laws restrict how people operate then their contributions to the overall well being are restricted.

Women have consistently been restricted over all of history...not by choice but by mandate.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

The Romans wore togas on the street but competed in their Olympic games naked.

The greek, you bloody fool.
And a toga is not a skirt, it's a long piece of cloth written by full citizens.
You mean Tunika. And that looks like a long t-shirt.

 

[Hel_Books]

Meekly_Anna said:
I think the Scots will totally agree that they are exceptional.

Idiot.
By the way the Tamil wear something similar.

The Romans wore togas on the street but competed in their Olympic games naked.

The Romans did participate in the Olympics, but for them the real thing thing was the sport in the Colosseum. The Olympics were rather more of a Greek thing.

As for togas, that was the garb of citizens, and male citizens only.