Legalistic discussion of oral sex acts

[CalBishForNow]

Quick question about a story I'm writing.

Alice and Bob have agreed that she'll give him a blowjob, and then he'll grant a request of hers. She gets him most of the way there with her mouth, including a little ball action, but finishes him off with her hands, ending with him cumming on her face. No jizz crosses anyone's lips.

Did she hold up her end of the bargain?

 

[dirk2024]

Quick question about a story I'm writing.

Alice and Bob have agreed that she'll give him a blowjob, and then he'll grant a request of hers. She gets him most of the way there with her mouth, including a little ball action, but finishes him off with her hands, ending with him cumming on her face. No jizz crosses anyone's lips.

Did she hold up her end of the bargain?

Depends on the details as agreed upon. A man can receive a blowjob without orgasming. The (written or verbal) contract would need to specify if there is to be an orgasm, and it what matter it is to be created. (mouth, hands or breasts).


It's a simple matter of habeus corpus.

 

[StillStunned]

Curiously, this didn't come up when I was studying Contract Law.

 

[alohadave]

Quick question about a story I'm writing.

Alice and Bob have agreed that she'll give him a blowjob, and then he'll grant a request of hers. She gets him most of the way there with her mouth, including a little ball action, but finishes him off with her hands, ending with him cumming on her face. No jizz crosses anyone's lips.

Did she hold up her end of the bargain?

Ask Bob.

 

[StillStunned]

Ask Bob.

I think it's fairly safe to say that all Bob cares about is a nap.

 

[VallesMarineris]

Quick question about a story I'm writing.

Alice and Bob have agreed that she'll give him a blowjob, and then he'll grant a request of hers. She gets him most of the way there with her mouth, including a little ball action, but finishes him off with her hands, ending with him cumming on her face. No jizz crosses anyone's lips.

Did she hold up her end of the bargain?

Wow! The only Alices I've encountered have wanted to send Bob cryptographically secure messages and/or share information about an entangled subatomic particle.

If I were Bob, I'd ask Alice to repeat the communication.

 

[AwkwardlySet]

This forum has really gone downhill in the past year.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Curiously, this didn't come up when I was studying Contract Law.

Don’t you recall Clinton vs Lewinsky, it was a famous case.

 

[CalBishForNow]

Thanks, everyone. For what it's worth, the story calls for Bob being disappointed but Alice being technically right, so if the consensus was that she cheated him, I probably would have changed some details.

 

[EmilyMiller]

Thanks, everyone. For what it's worth, the story calls for Bob being disappointed but Alice being technically right, so if the consensus was that she cheated him, I probably would have changed some details.

What court is he going to sue in?

 

[StillStunned]

What court is he going to sue in?

Whichever court will grant summary relief.

 

[dirk2024]

What court is he going to sue in?

Small claims court!

 

[Trionyx]

Curiously, this didn't come up when I was studying Contract Law.

Uh, was that ‘contact’ law?

 

[ShelbyDawn57]

Depends on the details as agreed upon. A man can receive a blowjob without orgasming. The (written or verbal) contract would need to specify if there is to be an orgasm, and it what matter it is to be created. (mouth, hands or breasts).


It's a simple matter of habeus corpus.

I would think this constitutes an oral contract, not a verbal one.

 

[Bramblethorn]

A while back I made a study of sex-work ads (call it "potential story research" but mostly just curiosity) and at least in that sphere, "blowjob" wouldn't usually include finishing there; that would be an extra charge.

 

[alohadave]

Small claims court!

Damn, way to harsh on Bob.

 

[KittyOfSteele]

Now I'm picturing a bunch of law firms drafting and revising contracts for people to be signed upon before any sexual interaction.

 

[TheRedLantern]

My next character will definitely be a Blowjob Lawyer.

"In the criminal blowjob justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups ..."

 

[Britva415]

Blowjob yes or no test: Did it get sucked or not?

 

[KittyOfSteele]

My next character will definitely be a Blowjob Lawyer.

"In the criminal blowjob justice system, the people are represented by two separate yet equally important groups ..."

DUN DUN!

 

[StillStunned]

I would think this constitutes an oral contract, not a verbal one.

Oral contracts can be tricky in these contexts. Imagine the confusion when you're talking about the but-for test.

 

[Kasumi_Lee]

Wow! The only Alices I've encountered have wanted to send Bob cryptographically secure messages and/or share information about an entangled subatomic particle.

If I were Bob, I'd ask Alice to repeat the communication.

When is Eve getting in on the action? She probably feels left out.

 

[pink_silk_glove]

Quick question about a story I'm writing.

Alice and Bob have agreed that she'll give him a blowjob, and then he'll grant a request of hers. She gets him most of the way there with her mouth, including a little ball action, but finishes him off with her hands, ending with him cumming on her face. No jizz crosses anyone's lips.

Did she hold up her end of the bargain?

I think the arguments and cases presented by both Bob and Alice is the real story here. That's your plot right there. It's like the Seinfeld parallel parking episode where George and that other guy argue over who's spot it is and whether you can parallel park head first or not and neither will budge and they hold up all the traffic. ; )

 

[ThatNewGuy]

Reminds me of the time I thought I'd caught my wife giving the plumber a blowjob. I felt pretty silly when she explained that all she'd done was to suck his cock, lick his balls, and let him come on her face.

 

[WittyUserName]

Curiously, this didn't come up when I was studying Contract Law.

It didn't come up when I took Business Law either. Strange, since it is arguably a business deal!