Great Idea

Because, hey, disagreement with the biggest, rottenest banana in the banana republic is enough of an excuse for ostracism, hey?
 
A sitting President making these comments about a Congress woman.is horrible
 
You all knew he was horrible back when the Access Hollywood tape played, or even earlier when he tried to keep dark-skinned people out of the buildings his ramshackle real estate company managed.
His reign of errors should have ended long before the 2016 election.
 
Comrade RightGuide and Saint_Inanity support the revocation of citizenship from US citizens.

But the stable geniuses insist they aren’t fascist. 😆
 
you're garbage, vetteman.
You’re not just slow, you’re still waddling around with Vetteman’s boot jammed so far up your ass it squeaks every time you open your mouth. Half your life is spent in the mirror shadowboxing ghosts who broke you years ago, the other half trying to convince yourself you ever won a round. You don’t sound like a rival, you sound like a walking museum exhibit of online humiliation. Honestly, I’d shake Vetteman’s hand just to thank him for the lasting intellectual trauma he burned into the lesser minds still limping around here in bitter tribute.:ROFLMAO:
 
Comrade RightGuide and Saint_Inanity support the revocation of citizenship from US citizens.

But the stable geniuses insist they aren’t fascist. 😆
If her citizenship was obtained under false pretenses, and questions have been raised that could be investigated and found to be true, she could lose her citizenship.
 
Because, hey, disagreement with the biggest, rottenest banana in the banana republic is enough of an excuse for ostracism, hey?

The Oath of Citizenship for the United States:

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."
And on Ilhan Omar's questionable statements in contrast to the above oath:

https://theamericantribune.com/watch-ilhan-omar-says-shes-here-to-protect-the-interests-of-somalia/

Omar would be entitled to legal counsel at a Naturalization hearing on this subject and if one were to occur the onus of proof is definitely upon the government to prove that she violated her oath.

In any case, she'd be fine going to Somalia so far as the US government is concerned. However, if she gets kidnapped while she's over there she can expect the Trump Administration to take its own sweet time looking into the matter. And she for damned sure better not expect US Marines to come rescue her ass.
 
A sitting President making these comments about a Congress woman.is horrible
The comments she makes about our country and our people are horrible as well. She does not appear to bear full faith and allegiance to our country.
 
The comments she makes about our country and our people are horrible as well. She does not appear to bear full faith and allegiance to our country.
I'm discussing the President of our country denigrating an elected member of Congress who represents the people in her district.

Dishonorable and disgusting.
 
If her citizenship was obtained under false pretenses, and questions have been raised that could be investigated and found to be true, she could lose her citizenship.
Who questioned her citizenship?
 
Omar would be entitled to legal counsel at a Naturalization hearing on this subject and if one were to occur the onus of proof is definitely upon the government to prove that she violated her oath.

In any case, she'd be fine going to Somalia so far as the US government is concerned. However, if she gets kidnapped while she's over there she can expect the Trump Administration to take its own sweet time looking into the matter. And she for damned sure better not expect US Marines to come rescue her ass.
Because, hey, the President of the United States gets to pick which citizens of his country get protection and which ones don't. Right? I mean, it's not like he's the President of the entire country, working for ALL its citizens, is he?
 
If her citizenship was obtained under false pretenses, and questions have been raised that could be investigated and found to be true, she could lose her citizenship.
Or she/her/it/? Could live with it/they/them/her husband/brother is always a possibility, then they/them Could finally enjoy the honeymoon they/them never had... on a hotel balcony overlooking the sewage pit that is Somalia...just say'in 🤷‍♀️
 
Because, hey, the President of the United States gets to pick which citizens of his country get protection and which ones don't.

Pretty much, yes.

If you leave the US and go to any place where there's a State Department travel advisory then it is the sole discretion of the President as to whether or not he approves the use of military force to rescue you.
 

If her citizenship was obtained under false pretenses, and questions have been raised that could be investigated and found to be true, she could lose her citizenship.

The comments she makes about our country and our people are horrible as well. She does not appear to bear full faith and allegiance to our country.

Or she/her/it/? Could live with it/they/them/her husband/brother is always a possibility, then they/them Could finally enjoy the honeymoon they/them never had... on a hotel balcony overlooking the sewage pit that is Somalia...just say'in 🤷‍♀️


She's a better American than any of you 🤡s. Including your president.


RDT_20250921_1321526746671840815236759_copy_585x607.jpg
 
Hel_Books said:
Because, hey, the President of the United States gets to pick which citizens of his country get protection and which ones don't.

Pretty much, yes.

If you leave the US and go to any place where there's a State Department travel advisory then it is the sole discretion of the President as to whether or not he approves the use of military force to rescue you.
On the other hand, if your President says, hey, this member of Congress disagrees with me, so I'm not going to send the troops to rescue them . . .

. . . but at the same time the President sends troops to Washington DC to pick up trash and scatter mulch at a national park . . .

. . . that says your President is irredeemably senile.
 
On the other hand, if your President says, hey, this member of Congress disagrees with me, so I'm not going to send the troops to rescue them . . .

. . . but at the same time the President sends troops to Washington DC to pick up trash and scatter mulch at a national park . . .

. . . that says your President is irredeemably senile.

No, it just says he's not going to put the lives of American soldiers in harm's way for a brotherfucking piece of shit who hates America anyway.
 
Back
Top