BrightShinyGirl
Abusive Little Bitch
- Joined
- Nov 22, 2013
- Posts
- 8,284
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Officers around most of the world have to show their faces and wear a badge with identification when in uniform. Only people who want to commit crime, like hold up a bank want to wear a mask. Or when they want to spread their filthy germs of course.We should ask all the PB wannabe lawyers if an officer's family is hurt or murdered as a result of retaliation by a gang, or whatever, what is the liability of the Ca government because of this legislation.![]()
Before this legislation what was the liability of the CA.government in that situation?We should ask all the PB wannabe lawyers if an officer's family is hurt or murdered as a result of retaliation by a gang, or whatever, what is the liability of the Ca government because of this legislation.
How does a face identify a person as being law enforcement? They are clearly wearing marked uniforms and are required to verbally identify as law enforcement.Officers around most of the world have to show their faces and wear a badge with identification when in uniform. Only people who want to commit crime, like hold up a bank want to wear a mask. Or when they want to spread their filthy germs of course.
I don't know the law. It's why I asked.Before this legislation what was the liability of the CA.government in that situation?
Has that changed?
Of courseI don't know the law. It's why I asked.
What's your problem elle-elle? Don't understand the question or just support illegals more than law enforcement? This legislation is a dangerous precedent.Of course
You don't know any of this to be true.California has exactly zero authority to regulate the conduct of Federal officers. They can pass this law but anyone trying to enforce it will face Federal prison time for the appropriate obstruction or interference charges. Newsom and the Democrats who passed this could even face RICO charges if anyone in California law enforcement is dumb enough to try to enforce this.
I'd expect if you're looking for information, you'd want to understand current and previous states.What's your problem elle-elle? Don't understand the question or just support illegals more than law enforcement? This legislation is a dangerous precedent.
Explain it to me, like I asked. You aspire to be a wannabe PB lawyer.I'd expect if you're looking for information, you'd want to understand current and previous states.
But I know you're not.
I believe Arpy is the wannabe PB lawyer. Maybe ask him.Explain it to me, like I asked. You aspire to be a wannabe PB lawyer.
You don't know any of this to be true.
I already asked. You thought you needed to contribute- nothing.I believe Arpy is the wannabe PB lawyer. Maybe ask him.
I'm not wrong. You can't read for shit. Reread the OP, dipshit.First, fuck you for being wrong again.
Second,
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45825
The Constitution's Supremacy Clause provides that federal law is "the supreme Law of the Land" notwithstanding any state law to the contrary.
I was asking additional questions.I already asked. You thought you needed to contribute- nothing.
Looks like the state of CA is setting up a test case of the supremacy clause. As we wait to see how it shakes out, I believe that ICE should show some respect for Governor Newsom by not wearing masks at The French Laundry.California has exactly zero authority to regulate the conduct of Federal officers. They can pass this law but anyone trying to enforce it will face Federal prison time for the appropriate obstruction or interference charges. Newsom and the Democrats who passed this could even face RICO charges if anyone in California law enforcement is dumb enough to try to enforce this.
However, the California Legislature has every authority to regulate the conduct of state and local officers and they can also expect to see a huge number of state and local cops resign from gang and drug enforcement duties over this.
Of course. You don't answer questions.I was asking additional questions.
You targeted wannabe lawyers with your question.Of course. You don't answer questions.
And since when are federal law enforcement kidnapping people.How does a face identify a person as being law enforcement? They are clearly wearing marked uniforms and are required to verbally identify as law enforcement.![]()
First, fuck you for being wrong again.
Second,
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/R45825
The Constitution's Supremacy Clause provides that federal law is "the supreme Law of the Land" notwithstanding any state law to the contrary.
Legitimate political pundits don't incite its citizenry to violently to rebel against law enforcement or dox people they don't like..Legitimate law enforcement officers don’t wear masks.