Okay, Now Leftists Are Posting Hit Lists of the People They Want to Murder Next

I'm discussing rights. And there are no diminished rights. One is not less than another.

Unless you're a leftist. Then their rights are worth more than your right to have a gun. Or vote any other way except their way. Or speak your own personal thoughts. Or live your life the way you desire to. Or raise your kids to believe in God.

The list goes on...
 
Nothing matters about Charlie Kirk's death any longer to @Baztrachian except the sex of the shooter's roommate.

Classic mouth breather "What Matters Most".

Use Kirk's death to mount your soapbox and demonize transsexuality as the root cause of allllllllllllll evil.

Pathetic.

You folks are trying to cast Tyler Robinson as a right-winger when that just isn't supported by the facts being published by leftist sources such as the New York Times, The Independent, and The Guardian.

Do you want to go shoot up their newsrooms for reporting things that hurt your feelings?
 
I'm discussing rights. And there are no diminished rights. One is not less than another.
Got it.
No mentally ill person who cannot be responsible with a weapon has the right to own a gun.

Those people literally take all rights away from others by murdering them.
 
Idk. I'm still just sick about the whole thing. I listened to Kirk some. He was a button pusher, cocky. Didn't deserve to die because of it. :)

He was all of that and more. I personally didn't like his methodology, nor do I believe in his vision, but he was inspirational for a lot of people who were looking for something to make their own lives meaningful.

The problem is that people don't realize that turning toward something also means turning away from everything else. And when an ideology cannot accept that it isn't universally accepted, it can get violent to those who look elsewhere for answers to their life's questions.

This was the same flaw in MLK's attempts to bring about change. And he paid the same price for it. Violent ideologies are not going to peacefully accept rejection by society's masses.
 
Got it.
No mentally ill person who cannot be responsible with a weapon has the right to own a gun.

Those people literally take all rights away from others by murdering them.

And we have laws to prohibit them from getting guns.

The PROBLEM begins in that you refuse to accept that transgenderism is a mental illness.
 
Best


Yes I refuse to accept your agenda.

This leads us to an impasse where you believe that the mentally ill should not own guns but refuse to accept that those who are transgender because they further your personal ideology are mentally ill.

All this does is show that you yourself are mentally ill because you are incapable of distinguishing reality from fantasy.
 
You folks are trying to cast Tyler Robinson as a right-winger when that just isn't supported by the facts being published by leftist sources such as the New York Times, The Independent, and The Guardian.

Do you want to go shoot up their newsrooms for reporting things that hurt your feelings?
Neither the guardian or the independent are leftist. The independent is owned by eugenie lebedev, son of an ex kgb colonel, alongside the evening standard.

The guardian is owned by the Scott trust, and is “traditionally affiliated with the centrist to centre-left Liberal Party, and with a northern, non-conformist circulation base, the paper earned a national reputation and the respect of the left during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939).” -Wikipedia
 
He was all of that and more. I personally didn't like his methodology, nor do I believe in his vision, but he was inspirational for a lot of people who were looking for something to make their own lives meaningful.

The problem is that people don't realize that turning toward something also means turning away from everything else. And when an ideology cannot accept that it isn't universally accepted, it can get violent to those who look elsewhere for answers to their life's questions.

This was the same flaw in MLK's attempts to bring about change. And he paid the same price for it. Violent ideologies are not going to peacefully accept rejection by society's masses.
How on earth can MLK be considered as having a violent ideology?
 
This leads us to an impasse where you believe that the mentally ill should not own guns but refuse to accept that those who are transgender because they further your personal ideology are mentally ill.
I refuse to agree with your argument....yes.


All this does is show that you yourself are mentally ill because you are incapable of distinguishing reality from fantasy.
Neat!
 
You folks are trying to cast Tyler Robinson as a right-winger when that just isn't supported by the facts being published by leftist sources such as the New York Times, The Independent, and The Guardian.

Do you want to go shoot up their newsrooms for reporting things that hurt your feelings?
You don't have facts.

Facts:. Grew up in a MAGAt household in a MAGAt State with gun toting religious parents.
All your crap about trans and roommates is pure MAGAt speculation.
 
How on earth can MLK be considered as having a violent ideology?

You need to go back and re read what I wrote.

MLK was trying to prevent racism by raising awareness among the people about how evil it was. He was killed for it by those who perpetuate racism; eg a violent ideology.

Kirk was trying to do the same thing. With the same result.

That you couldn't figure that out on your own really shows how dumb and easily brainwashed you are.
 
You need to go back and re read what I wrote.

MLK was trying to prevent racism by raising awareness among the people about how evil it was. He was killed for it by those who perpetuate racism; eg a violent ideology.

Kirk was trying to do the same thing. With the same result.

That you couldn't figure that out on your own really shows how dumb and easily brainwashed you are.

I’m open to considering Kirk a martyr for a cause as MLK.

Interested to see what the monument is gonna look like. Can’t make 9/10 a national holiday, it’s too close to 9/11 - I recommend April 1st or even February 31st.
 
Neither the guardian or the independent are leftist. The independent is owned by eugenie lebedev, son of an ex kgb colonel, alongside the evening standard.

The guardian is owned by the Scott trust, and is “traditionally affiliated with the centrist to centre-left Liberal Party, and with a northern, non-conformist circulation base, the paper earned a national reputation and the respect of the left during the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939).” -Wikipedia

The Guardian is left-center.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-guardian/

The Independent is left-center.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-independent/
 
Now we see the pretentious David Hogg:

He could have spared us the RSVP to his own corpse’s political theater. Wanting his death to be a fundraising gala and a legislative press release before his blood’s even dry is some real performative cynicism, a grotesque mix of virtue-signaling and careerist calculation. Real victims deserve dignity; real reform requires hard work, not instant outrage packaged for donors. If his first instinct is to weaponize his own death for political capital, he's just a cynic treating human life like a hashtag.
 
Now we see the pretentious David Hogg:

He could have spared us the RSVP to his own corpse’s political theater. Wanting his death to be a fundraising gala and a legislative press release before his blood’s even dry is some real performative cynicism, a grotesque mix of virtue-signaling and careerist calculation. Real victims deserve dignity; real reform requires hard work, not instant outrage packaged for donors. If his first instinct is to weaponize his own death for political capital, he's just a cynic treating human life like a hashtag.
Poor white guy still triggered by a youngin.
 
You don't have facts.

Facts:. Grew up in a MAGAt household in a MAGAt State with gun toting religious parents.
All your crap about trans and roommates is pure MAGAt speculation.

I grew up in an adamantly leftist household. Do you blame my parents for my ardent conservative and libertarian views?
 
You need to go back and re read what I wrote.

MLK was trying to prevent racism by raising awareness among the people about how evil it was. He was killed for it by those who perpetuate racism; eg a violent ideology.

Kirk was trying to do the same thing. With the same result.

That you couldn't figure that out on your own really shows how dumb and easily brainwashed you are.
Or you could go back and make yourself clear.
You’re the one finding equivalency between MLK and a man claiming :
“Happening all the time in urban America, prowling Blacks go around for fun to go target white people, that’s a fact. It’s happening more and more.”
– The Charlie Kirk Show, 19 May 2023
No commonality there whatsoever, and before you continue that doesn’t condone Kirk’s shooting.
 
Now we see the pretentious David Hogg:

He could have spared us the RSVP to his own corpse’s political theater. Wanting his death to be a fundraising gala and a legislative press release before his blood’s even dry is some real performative cynicism, a grotesque mix of virtue-signaling and careerist calculation. Real victims deserve dignity; real reform requires hard work, not instant outrage packaged for donors. If his first instinct is to weaponize his own death for political capital, he's just a cynic treating human life like a hashtag.

He wants a legacy. What he doesn't realize is that there are a great many people who would PPV his cremation and who will swear to remember it afterward for the rest of their lives.

Which is the only legacy he'll get.
 
I grew up in an adamantly leftist household. Do you blame my parents for my ardent conservative and libertarian views?

Yet another magat coming out the closet admitting that they are gay/trans. 🥳🥰

The transgender agenda was created to spay and neuter children at a young age.

Given that the vast majority of children who are sterilized via surgical and hormonal treatments are themselves the offspring of leftist whackjobs
 
Back
Top