Okay, Now Leftists Are Posting Hit Lists of the People They Want to Murder Next

[Baztrachian]

Nope. Someone who uses weapons to kill other human beings is not mentally capable to own a weapon.

Soldiers, police, security guards...

 

[ll74]

'Capable' isn't the word you are looking for.

It is.

Responsibility to not kill someone purposely is part of being capable, imo.

Self defense is the only exception.

 

[ll74]

Soldiers, police, security guards...

A person must prove they are capable of being responsible with a gun.

 

[Saint_Ann]

It is.

Responsibility to not kill someone purposely is part of being capable, imo.

Self defense is the only exception.

He was capable enough to obtain a .30-06, climb a roof and shoot someone with it. That's capability.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The Charlie Kirk Narrative continues to evolve and will continue to evolve until mouth breathers like @Baztrachian get their goddamned Trans talking point into the mainstream....

View this content on Instagram

View this content on Instagram

As the late unlamented bobogook used to say, "Defrectors On Full!"

 

[ll74]

He was capable enough to obtain a .30-06, climb a roof and shoot someone with it. That's capability.

Responsibility is part of capability. He should not have had access to a weapon

 

[Baztrachian]

A person must prove they are capable of being responsible with a gun.

Then you don't mind reinstating means testing and literacy tests for voters to make sure they 1) should be voting and 2) understand what they're voting on.

Right?

Like I've often said: Voting is a right and owning a firearm is a right. Therefore it should be no harder to vote than it is to buy a firearm.

 

[Saint_Ann]

Responsibility is part of capability. He should not have had access to a weapon

Stop using 'capability'. It's the wrong word.

 

[DeluxAuto]

 

[Baztrachian]

The Charlie Kirk Narrative continues to evolve and will continue to evolve until mouth breathers like @Baztrachian get their goddamned Trans talking point into the mainstream....

Getting frustrated with me, are you? Do you want to kill me because I'm pissing you off and hurting your feelings? Hmmm?

 

[HisArpy]

A person must prove they are capable of being responsible with a gun.

Does the same thing apply to speech? Or voting? Possessing private property? Invoking the 5th?

 

[ll74]

Then you don't mind reinstating means testing and literacy tests for voters to make sure they 1) should be voting and 2) understand what they're voting on.

Right?

Like I've often said: Voting is a right and owning a firearm is a right. Therefore it should be no harder to vote than it is to buy a firearm.

I'm discussing guns.

Feel free to discuss voting as you need

 

[ll74]

Does the same thing apply to speech? Or voting? Possessing private property? Invoking the 5th?

I'm discussing guns.

Feel free to discuss other topics as needed with others. Seems like you and Baz could discuss.

 

[ll74]

Stop using 'capability'. It's the wrong word.

It's not. I'll use whatever word I want, thanks

 

[HisArpy]

I'm discussing guns.

Feel free to discuss other topics as needed with others.

You're discussing "capability" as if it means mental competency. And then making blanket statements regarding Constitutional Rights while disregarding how that entire Constitutional Rights thing works.

Basically you fucked up and are now refusing to admit it. Which makes you look like a bigger idjit than you usually do.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Getting frustrated with me, are you? Do you want to kill me because I'm pissing you off and hurting your feelings? Hmmm?

I'm actually enjoying watching you twist slowly in the wind.

Not a lot of support from your side of the aisle for your "it's gotta be a tranny, right? RIGHT?" nonsense, is there?

Perhaps when your fellow Transphobe the Vettebigot wakes up he'll come to your aid.

 

[ll74]

You're discussing "capability" as if it means mental competency. And then making blanket statements regarding Constitutional Rights while disregarding how that entire Constitutional Rights thing works.

Basically you fucked up and are now refusing to admit it. Which makes you look like a bigger idjit than you usually do.

Neat

 

[Baztrachian]

View attachment 2564710

Sorry, chum. Tyler was a leftist. That much has been confirmed in abundance.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/14/us/kirk-shooting-suspect-ideology-partner.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ler-robinson-motive-spencer-cox-b2826344.html

https://www.timesnownews.com/world/...what-utah-governor-revealed-article-152801715

https://nypost.com/2025/09/13/us-ne...n-deeply-indoctrinated-with-leftist-ideology/

 

[Saint_Ann]

It's not.

Able to achieve efficiently whatever one has to do; competent. All except getting caught.

 

[ll74]

Able to achieve efficiently whatever one has to do; competent. All except getting caught.

Neat

 

[HisArpy]

Able to achieve efficiently whatever one has to do; competent. All except getting caught.

Based on this, is 74 "competent?"

 

[Baztrachian]

Not a lot of support from your side of the aisle for your "it's gotta be a tranny, right? RIGHT?" nonsense, is there?

Tyler wasn't a tranny but his boyfriend was.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Basically you fucked up and are now refusing to admit it. Which makes you look like a bigger idjit than you usually do.

Hey speaking of fuckups, refresh my memory...how many fentanyl deaths were there in America in 2024?

 

[HisArpy]

Neat

Not my fault you insist on being stupid in public.

But you do you, we're all getting laff out of it.

 

[Baztrachian]

I'm discussing guns.

Feel free to discuss voting as you need

I'm discussing rights. And there are no diminished rights. One is not less than another.