FIRED

Interesting. Some observations make sense. I found it odd sticking a long gun down his pants, it would never fit unless the rifle was partially disassembled. The scope and stock carried in his backpack. Defense attorneys will blown this case out of the water if that’s used as evidence. It appears that there’s a lot more to this shooting than what’s being told. IMHO
No doubt. We're too damn used to instant gratification.....................patience.
 
Interesting. Some observations make sense. I found it odd sticking a long gun down his pants, it would never fit unless the rifle was partially disassembled. The scope and stock carried in his backpack. Defense attorneys will blown this case out of the water if that’s used as evidence. It appears that there’s a lot more to this shooting than what’s being told. IMHO
The rifle side of this has many holes. I doubt that scope could be indexed for that accurate a shot after being broken down. I also don’t buy he broke a Mauser hunting rifle down that quick…not saying it cant’ be done, but that’s not a battle rifle…

Something isn’t adding up.
 
The rifle side of this has many holes. I doubt that scope could be indexed for that accurate a shot after being broken down. I also don’t buy he broke a Mauser hunting rifle down that quick…not saying it cant’ be done, but that’s not a battle rifle…

Something isn’t adding up.

The Zapruder film will show that the shot actually came not from the roof of the dormitory but from the grassy knoll - perfectly accounting for why Kirk's body fell back and to the left... back and to the left... back and to the left.
 
The Zapruder film will show that the shot actually came not from the roof of the dormitory but from the grassy knoll - perfectly accounting for why Kirk's body fell back and to the left... back and to the left... back and to the left.
WTF are you on about Shoegaze? Stop conflating your Radicalized democrat assassinations.
 
Millions of ‘tolerant’ psychopaths are terrified that they’re losing a game that they’ve designed the rules for.

I come bearing fantastic news though, my dear ‘tolerant’ psychopaths.

The ‘cancel culture’ that you did such a great job designing, was created to oppress and ruin the lives of people with opinions you hated or jokes that offended you.

What’s happening to you is not ‘cancel culture’. This is acknowledging that you are a public safety threat.

We don’t want teachers that support the murder of an innocent father, teaching our children.

We don’t want 911 responders celebrating the assassination of a political commentator responsible for keeping us safe.

We don’t want nurses justifying the killing of a man they don’t like deciding whether we ‘deserve’ their medical care.

These are very reasonable steps to prevent you from killing us and then celebrating our demise.

Thank you for designing the cancel culture infrastructure. We’ll make the most of it.

1757946250655.png
 
The rifle side of this has many holes. I doubt that scope could be indexed for that accurate a shot after being broken down. I also don’t buy he broke a Mauser hunting rifle down that quick…not saying it cant’ be done, but that’s not a battle rifle…

Something isn’t adding up.

The scope is mounted to the receiver. Unless that changes, it doesn't matter what stock the receiver/barrel are mounted in, or if it's not mounted at all, it will still hold zero.

The police found a screwdriver on the roof. Wanna bet it was used to tighten the 2 screws that hold a Mauser receiver to the stock? It really takes no more time to dismount a Mauser as it takes to disassemble a break-down rifle. The difference is the size of the parts when it's taken down.

Since the barrel can't be removed from the receiver, that piece will be long and would require being stuffed down a pants leg to carry it in concealment. The bottom plate, bolt, and stock could easily fit in the backpack along with the ammo.
 
Bull shit. Be honest here. If we took blacks out the the equation, the rest of America has a lower gun crime rate than Canada and every country in Europe.

Our problem is not gun related shootings. Our problem is black-related shootings.
The UK, for example, had 22 gun-related homicides in 2024. Removing the "black-related" shootings (and how about shootings like that white woman who blew away the black kid knocking on her door to ask directions, is that "black-related"?) won't get your gun homicide rate anywhere near as low as the rest of the civilized world!

You're all just a bunch of fetishists stroking gun barrels, then surprised at what comes out . . .
 
WAPO EDITOR: I Got Fired Over Charlie Kirk.

[Karen] Attiah sources this from an article rushed out by The Guardian less than 24 hours after Kirk’s death that attempted to argue sotto voce that Kirk had it coming. Even if one grants the Guardian the presumption that they took his words in context, Attiah changed the quote the Guardian provided at the link she used as a reference. This is the quote that the Guardian allegedly pulled from Kirk’s show in July 2023:
If we would have said that Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Ketanji Brown Jackson were affirmative action picks, we would have been called racists. Now they’re coming out and they’re saying it for us … You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously.
Note that the quote doesn’t include the phrase “black women” at all. Kirk referenced four specific black women in this criticism, arguing that their own words made them look like affirmative-action charity cases. The “you” in this case refers to the four women he named. Attiah rewrote this quote to make it sound as though Kirk was talking about all black women.
That is journalistic fraud. And that is likely why the Post just handed Attiah her walking papers. She lied to readers, and did so to imply that Charlie Kirk had it coming. She used quotation marks to sell her fraud, knowing damned well that quotation marks mean something to readers, and that falsely representing a quote in that manner is corrupt.
More here: “The real question is how she kept her job this long. While I’m glad the Post finally took action, it is absurd that Attiah was kept on the payroll for years on end, even as she excused violence against her perceived political opponents and promoted the ideas of Islamic terrorists. Lastly, lest anyone believe Attiah was a free speech absolutist, she lobbied to get the editor fired who published Tom Cotton’s 2020 op-ed suggesting the use of the military to quell widespread, left-wing riots.”

Attiah was pro October 7th: WaPo Columnist Celebrates Anti-Jew Terrorism As Exactly What ‘Decolonization’ Means.
 
Back
Top