FIRED

And they're all obviously misguided. We have it in good authority that cancel culture is good....who are we to argue with Rolling Stone

1757887494863.png
 
Rando internet people are obviously important 👍

But think about it. If you interview for a job and they ask, "Do you support the murder of your political opponents?"

And you say, "Yes" - you probably won't get the job.

You might rightly be seen as psychologically unstable and dangerous to co-workers - much less a good representative of the company and its values.

Why would that logic change if you reveal yourself as a potentially violent radical after you are hired?

It'simportant to all of us that these people are identified and terminated from their jobs, especially jobs where they can cause harm to people through medical malpractice or by miseducation.
 
But think about it. If you interview for a job and they ask, "Do you support the murder of your political opponents?"
Why would they do that?

You might rightly be seen as psychologically unstable and dangerous to co-workers - much less a good representative of the company and its values.
Neat

Why would that logic change if you reveal yourself as a potentially violent radical after you are hired?
This has nothing to do with my comment.

It'simportant to all of us that these people are identified and terminated from their jobs, especially jobs where they can cause harm to people through medical malpractice or by miseducation.
Your interest in random people on the internet is what I brought up.
 
The Care and Feeding of YOUR Right Wing Death Squad, Chapter 44: The Murder of Charlie Kirk and Extreme Self Defense

Copyright (c), 2025, Thomas Kratman, Harry Kitchener
Tom Kratman
Sep 14, 2025

You’re Just Determined to Give the Right No Choice, Aren’t You?

Tom’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Yes, yes, we know; from the Leftie point of view Charlie Kirk needed to be killed because he was a mean man who said things that upset you and was generally unwilling to leave you in your extremely safe echo chambers. Oh, and he was a Nazi, too, right? Except he never said or wrote a word remotely Nazi-like. And he was a racist, right? Ummm, no; not that either. And he was intolerant? Intolerant? The man who wanted to keep free discussion open? Who was uniformly and unfailingly polite no matter how deranged the leftist he was talking to?

No, no; you wanted Charlie Kirk dead because he was effective. Terrible crime, of course, not being a leftist and being effective. Ahem.

Interestingly enough, someone on Twitter recently – yes, before Charlie was murdered – threatened Tom with a sniping attack. Yes, really. We guess the body armor needs to come out of the closet. Tom doesn’t know the person’s real name, of course, because, as cowards will, he hides behind a nom-de-shitbird. On the plus side, someone who hides behind a false name probably doesn’t have the courage to actually pull a trigger on someone.

However, let’s suppose Tom did know his name, hence could find his address, and, incidentally, proving the threatener was not a complete coward. In what way would it be immoral to hunt the son of a bitch down and terminate his ass or have someone do so? I’m waiting…I’m still waiting…

Note that Tom does not hide his name. Infer from that what you will. Just saying…

So there are four – well, at least four, plus an infinity of combinations – ways for the right to react to this, to this declaration of murder the left has launched upon them.

One of these is to ignore it, pretend it’s business as usual, go on about their business, keeping their heads down and being so meek and silent that the left doesn’t notice their wormlike existence. I don’t think this is really a complete option anymore.

Another is to do what is currently being done, canceling, silencing, and getting fired the leftists celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk or who egged on the killer. You, O Lefty, better hope this works.

A third is more official, involving arresting those who have been suborning murder, whether in the press, on television, on social media, or in Congress – oh, and this includes those who own, for example, various media…no matter how wealthy or well-connected they may be.

If the cancelling and silencing and getting minions fired, lefties, you had better pray that using the legal system works, because the next step is the right murdering you before you can murder them. Because, if it doesn’t, then the next option left is death squads, the very thing we’ve been trying to avoid by getting you to calm the fuck down and act, speak, and write like responsible adults.

And that is option number four, pre-emptive political murder of those who have been advocating murder – and remember, something between substantial minorities and majorities of the left have been advocating political murder or, at least, have voiced their approval of it. Yes, yes; we know that those on the right aren’t really human beings to you, that they have no right to life, that your own incredible moral superiority entitles you to designate who can live and who must die. But, sadly, from your point of view, they are increasingly looking at you exactly the same way, and especially since you began mass orgasming over the murder of Charlie Kirk.

You ought to think, too, of who – the who writ large – you have been calling for the murder of. Elon Musk? Elon – 400 or so billion – Musk? Elon who could fund an army on his own and would find funding a death squad a matter for petty cash? Oh, and he could fund their legal defense, too, to include bribing the judges or juries or prosecuting attorneys at whatever level the market would bear. Or the president, who doesn’t have to fund anything personally, although he could. You – having had some of your minions try to kill him twice – have to be taken as a credible threats. You think he can’t find some FBI agents, eager to retain their jobs, to do a little dirty work? You think CAG – formerly known as Delta – wouldn’t uniformly and universally like to see you all dead? Wrong answer.

Idiots.
 
The Care and Feeding of YOUR Right Wing Death Squad, Chapter 44: The Murder of Charlie Kirk and Extreme Self Defense

Copyright (c), 2025, Thomas Kratman, Harry Kitchener
Tom Kratman
Sep 14, 2025

You’re Just Determined to Give the Right No Choice, Aren’t You?

Tom’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Yes, yes, we know; from the Leftie point of view Charlie Kirk needed to be killed because he was a mean man who said things that upset you and was generally unwilling to leave you in your extremely safe echo chambers. Oh, and he was a Nazi, too, right? Except he never said or wrote a word remotely Nazi-like. And he was a racist, right? Ummm, no; not that either. And he was intolerant? Intolerant? The man who wanted to keep free discussion open? Who was uniformly and unfailingly polite no matter how deranged the leftist he was talking to?

No, no; you wanted Charlie Kirk dead because he was effective. Terrible crime, of course, not being a leftist and being effective. Ahem.

Interestingly enough, someone on Twitter recently – yes, before Charlie was murdered – threatened Tom with a sniping attack. Yes, really. We guess the body armor needs to come out of the closet. Tom doesn’t know the person’s real name, of course, because, as cowards will, he hides behind a nom-de-shitbird. On the plus side, someone who hides behind a false name probably doesn’t have the courage to actually pull a trigger on someone.

However, let’s suppose Tom did know his name, hence could find his address, and, incidentally, proving the threatener was not a complete coward. In what way would it be immoral to hunt the son of a bitch down and terminate his ass or have someone do so? I’m waiting…I’m still waiting…

Note that Tom does not hide his name. Infer from that what you will. Just saying…

So there are four – well, at least four, plus an infinity of combinations – ways for the right to react to this, to this declaration of murder the left has launched upon them.

One of these is to ignore it, pretend it’s business as usual, go on about their business, keeping their heads down and being so meek and silent that the left doesn’t notice their wormlike existence. I don’t think this is really a complete option anymore.

Another is to do what is currently being done, canceling, silencing, and getting fired the leftists celebrating the murder of Charlie Kirk or who egged on the killer. You, O Lefty, better hope this works.

A third is more official, involving arresting those who have been suborning murder, whether in the press, on television, on social media, or in Congress – oh, and this includes those who own, for example, various media…no matter how wealthy or well-connected they may be.

If the cancelling and silencing and getting minions fired, lefties, you had better pray that using the legal system works, because the next step is the right murdering you before you can murder them. Because, if it doesn’t, then the next option left is death squads, the very thing we’ve been trying to avoid by getting you to calm the fuck down and act, speak, and write like responsible adults.

And that is option number four, pre-emptive political murder of those who have been advocating murder – and remember, something between substantial minorities and majorities of the left have been advocating political murder or, at least, have voiced their approval of it. Yes, yes; we know that those on the right aren’t really human beings to you, that they have no right to life, that your own incredible moral superiority entitles you to designate who can live and who must die. But, sadly, from your point of view, they are increasingly looking at you exactly the same way, and especially since you began mass orgasming over the murder of Charlie Kirk.

You ought to think, too, of who – the who writ large – you have been calling for the murder of. Elon Musk? Elon – 400 or so billion – Musk? Elon who could fund an army on his own and would find funding a death squad a matter for petty cash? Oh, and he could fund their legal defense, too, to include bribing the judges or juries or prosecuting attorneys at whatever level the market would bear. Or the president, who doesn’t have to fund anything personally, although he could. You – having had some of your minions try to kill him twice – have to be taken as a credible threats. You think he can’t find some FBI agents, eager to retain their jobs, to do a little dirty work? You think CAG – formerly known as Delta – wouldn’t uniformly and universally like to see you all dead? Wrong answer.

Idiots.
"You made us do things that we told you were bad"
 
Tom is ALWAYS on target, If you want to debate that one, just look him up on X - he'd be more than happ to oblige LOL
Yes, he's espousing the same horseshit you are

"You made me do this"

I don't need to debate anything....you posted his bullshit and I pointed it out
 
Do suspects generally not cooperate?

Some do because they know that it will affect the plead deal they're going to agree to.

Most don't because they are lawless at heart and have no fear of going to jail/prison. Mostly because our soft on crime/bleeding heart judicial system doesn't teach them anything except how to reoffend.
 

Joe Burrow’s Charity Fires Judge For Inappropriate Charlie Kirk Post​













View Source | September 13, 2025 5:10 pm

https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/facebook.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/twitter.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/email.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/sharethis.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/reddit.svg

Share This Article​

The Joe Burrow Foundation fired a board member over insensitive comments about the death of Charlie Kirk.
Ted Berry, an Ohio judge, was removed from his position after allegedly writing several Facebook posts on the Utah shooting that left the conservative commentator dead on Wednesday, according to Fox 19 in Cincinnati.
“The Joe Burrow Foundation was founded on the belief that everybody has the responsibility to do good,” the statement, which did not name Berry, read. “We have terminated an advisory board member that made inappropriate remarks in light of recent events and they are no longer associated with the Foundation. Their comments do not reflect our values or our mission. We are committed to accountability and respect for all.”
In the first of a series of comments, Berry wrote “Rest in Hatred & Division!” on a post honoring Kirk, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported.
Berry responded to another Facebook user that Kirk “spewed hate & division.”
“How’s he feel about gun violence and gun control in Hell, now?” Berry reportedly said in another post.
Berry told the outlet that he does not “condone any type of violence on any human being.”
“I regret if I caused division,” Berry said, per the Enquirer. “That was not my intent. And I hope there can be peace.”
The Bengals quarterback founded the charity in 2022 with the “mission to provide resources and support for the underprivileged and underserved,” per the foundation’s website.
More here
 

Joe Burrow’s Charity Fires Judge For Inappropriate Charlie Kirk Post​













View Source | September 13, 2025 5:10 pm

https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/facebook.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/twitter.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/email.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/sharethis.svg
https://platform-cdn.sharethis.com/img/reddit.svg

Share This Article​

The Joe Burrow Foundation fired a board member over insensitive comments about the death of Charlie Kirk.
Ted Berry, an Ohio judge, was removed from his position after allegedly writing several Facebook posts on the Utah shooting that left the conservative commentator dead on Wednesday, according to Fox 19 in Cincinnati.
“The Joe Burrow Foundation was founded on the belief that everybody has the responsibility to do good,” the statement, which did not name Berry, read. “We have terminated an advisory board member that made inappropriate remarks in light of recent events and they are no longer associated with the Foundation. Their comments do not reflect our values or our mission. We are committed to accountability and respect for all.”
In the first of a series of comments, Berry wrote “Rest in Hatred & Division!” on a post honoring Kirk, the Cincinnati Enquirer reported.
Berry responded to another Facebook user that Kirk “spewed hate & division.”
“How’s he feel about gun violence and gun control in Hell, now?” Berry reportedly said in another post.
Berry told the outlet that he does not “condone any type of violence on any human being.”
“I regret if I caused division,” Berry said, per the Enquirer. “That was not my intent. And I hope there can be peace.”
The Bengals quarterback founded the charity in 2022 with the “mission to provide resources and support for the underprivileged and underserved,” per the foundation’s website.
More here

Next step, fire Ted Berry's ass as a judge.
 
Back
Top