The Charlie Kirk Shooter Reality Thread

The phrases on the casing have directly been tied to Nick Fuentes's White Nationalist beliefs.
This is inaccurate.

"Hey, Fascist! Catch!" has no known connection to Fuentes or his movement. “Fascist” is mostly a left-wing insult in their eyes. Groypers see it as something liberals, mainstream conservatives, or “the establishment” throw around to shut down debate. Prominent groypers, such as podcaster Connor Betts (aka "Pinesap"), have self-identified as fascist without apparent shame.

The three arrows symbol is a symbol from the Social Democrats in Germany, often used by Antifa, the three arrows representing rejection of Communism, fascism, and monarchy. The Social Democrats are on the left.

"Bella Ciao" is an Italian anti-fascist song often used by Antifa. It has no known connection to Fuentes or Groypers.

A friend, family members, and the Governor all say he was a leftist. (The report on the friend comes from The Guardian, a left-leaning paper. The report is against their ideological interest.)

The claim that Fuentes called Kirk fascist is all based on second-hand information.

The alt-right’s collectivist, conflict-driven approach (e.g., race as a unifying struggle) mimics Marxist structures. Both woke left and alt-right are identity-based, not individual-based. Both see society as fundamentally about group conflict. The alt-right’s worldview is explicitly identity-based, emphasizing racial hierarchies and cultural exclusivity, often framing whites as victims of multiculturalism. This mirrors, in structure, the progressive left’s focus on identity groups.

Both Marxists and the alt-right seek to collapse society to impose their own visions. The alt-right isn’t truly “right.” Liberal democracy is the essence of what's called "right wing" philosophy. It's rooted in protecting the values that have worked for millennia, a free economy, government that restricts itself to (in Russell Kirk's words) "provid[ing] a tolerable degree of order so that liberty may flourish," and a strong, but not intrusive foreign and defense policy. It prefers equality under the law to "equity" and individual rights to groups. It si communitarian, but in a non-collectivist way. Marxists and alt-rightists oppose all of that.

The alt-right often critiques unchecked capitalism, favoring protectionist or statist policies. For instance, Spencer’s National Policy Institute opposes free markets. Marxists advocate abolishing private property and capitalism.

The alt-right envisions a strong state. The alt-right prioritizes group identity, as the "woke" left also does.

Both reject the old-school “legitimate right” (limited government, rule of law, individual liberty, free markets). They’re mirror-image tribal movements competing to replace classical liberalism and traditional conservatism.
 
Please post the ACTUAL family / lifestyle / political background information and motivations of the shooter here (the PB MAGAts are hard at work LYING & GASLIGHTING about the shooter in an attempt to define that murderous POS as a Democrat / Liberal / Member of "the left".

TIA

👍

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
Nope, you're the lying, gaslighting, piece of shit.
 
Nope, you're the lying, gaslighting, piece of shit.

🙄

Someone doesn’t like the fact that the shooter’s background is full on ammosexual MAGAt republican.

There’s a good dose of online radicalization present as well, but let’s not hold big tech or social media giants (Elon Musk) accountable / responsible…

(and guns can’t even be brought into the discussion according to the "free speech and respectful free exchange of viewpoints" crowd…)

😑

Instead we get: “IT’S ALL THE DEMOCRATS FAULT FOR CALLING A SPADE A SPADE" from the right wing usual suspects…

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Last edited:
You realize you just said you prefer lies to the truth.

🙄

You aren’t smart enough to realize what I said / what my comment meant (no MAGAt republican is)…

Maybe a "Libertarian" can explain it to you…(Hint: It involves gaslighting).

😑

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
This assassin was a Radicalized POS just like yourself. So blinded by hate. Please try not to burn a Tesla or shoot a Conservative neighbor today.
Teslas set themselves on fire.

Are you suggesting that radicalized POS assassins should be prevented from having guns, or are you content with the occasional death of a MAGAt influencer so that you can continue to have your firearms?
 
Wasn’t it you who was bragging about firing “MAGA” employees a while back? Now you’re over on the Firing thread crying about Radicalized democrats losing their jobs because they couldn’t contain their glee and impulse to dance on a conservative’s grave.

That was eric_e, and he is center right politically (he voted for George Bush, etc), so…

😑

You lose!!!

👍

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
"
THE VAST MAJORITY of Maga types are deep down insecure bullies who wish they had some redeeming qualities - but know that they don't.

They have never developed sense of humor, humility, empathy, or actual wisdom. Instead, they are fueled by narcissistic pursuits and transactional associations.

They spend their lives overcompensating and fantasizing how important they are - stuck in a petty, juvenile mentality. They antagonize people to make themselves feel better.

The same is obviously true for the person who is their champion."
 
An updated take / narrative now that more facts are coming out:

(Not so much a mea culpa as a refinement of my original take).

IF right wing sources are to be believed, the shooter’s motive was anger towards Charlie Kirk for endangering a romantic partner (allegedly trans) with his hateful anti-trans attacks that put a target on the trans community (which would have included the shooters alleged trans partner). Fair enough.

The shooter is STILL a POS ammosexual who WAS steeped in gun porn culture at an early age,, so it isn’t surprising that a gun was his go to solution…

Also:

The shooters parents being MAGAts suggests that they fully supported defending themselves and their loved ones with extreme gun prejudice, and the shooter may well have felt justified in shooting Charlie Kirk in the neck as an act of defending a loved one.

Also:

The shooter was STILL steeped / indoctrinated in online culture, so there is a fuckton to unpack in that space / area (was he radicalized online???). Big tech / social media giants (Elon, etc) deserve scrutiny as well.

👍

Overall, this is looking to be just a case of another angry ammosexual white man trying to "protect" what he held dear by going to his “solution-toolbox” and retrieving the only tool in that toolbox…a GUN… and then role playing the "hero" like in some online fantasy…

😳 😑 🤬

Charlie Kirk was basically the victim of aggravated homicide.

FAFO seems to apply here:

Charlie Kirk fucked around by creating the perception in the mind of the shooter that he (Charlie Kirk) was a threat that needed to be eliminated, and then Charlie Kirk found out…

Simple enough.

Moving on now…

👍

🇺🇸

We. Told. Them. So.

🌷
 
Back
Top