LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

How well known was Charles Kirk?

Rightguide said:
Hel_Books said:
Why all this fuss? Charlie Kirk himself said:

"We must also be real. We must be honest with the population. Having an armed citizenry comes with a price, and that is part of liberty... We need to be very clear that you're not going to get gun deaths to zero. It will not happen. But I think it's worth it. I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment."

You should all just thank good ol' Charlie for paying the "price" and get on with your lives.
Click to expand...

Rightguide said:
Yes, because the presence of dangerous individuals in society makes it necessary for citizens to be able to defend themselves, ensuring the preservation of liberty and the greater good, as the Founders understood.
Click to expand...
Wait a minute, does this mean the person who shot Charlie Kirk was defending his society, eliminating a dangerous individual? Is that why it was important for guns to be easily available to him?
 
HisArpy said:
Still not going to help you when the shit hits the fan.

You will not be able to outvote those who are waking up. Nor will you be able to mess around with the tabulations of those votes. When the counting is done, so too will your ideology be.
Click to expand...
What do you think is about to happen?
 
BrightShinyGirl said:
People are going to lose their jobs over exercising their free speech rights? I’m not worried. Americans will stand up for free speech no matter who tries to muzzle us.
Click to expand...

You don't have "free speech rights" on the job. Nor does your employer have to tolerate improper behavior on your part while you're not at work.

Finally, America is standing up. And you dumshits are finally finding out that you not listening when people tell you to knock it off isn't a good idea.
 
Proof me wrong?
Nope.

The burden of proof lies with the person making a claim because it's a fundamental principle of logical and scientific reasoning. This concept is often summarized by the phrase, "What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."
The primary reason for this is that it's infinitely easier to make a claim than it is to disprove every possible claim. If the burden of disproof were on the listener, we would be forced to spend all our time and energy trying to falsify an endless number of unsubstantiated assertions, no matter how outlandish they are. This would be a completely inefficient and unproductive way to seek truth.
This principle is also known as Hitchens's razor, a philosophical tenet named after the writer Christopher Hitchens. It's a way of saying that the responsibility to provide evidence for an extraordinary claim rests on the person who made it, and the rest of us are not obligated to take the claim seriously until that evidence is provided.

You proof that you are right or you don't flabber yer gob.
 
Last edited:
Charlie Kirk being murdered by a right-wing nut guarantees he will be forgotten.

If a liberal had killed him, Kirk would instantly become a useful martyr and could be lionized for decades.

But now the whole affair is intensely embarrassing and will be quickly stuffed down the memory hole.
 
HisArpy said:
You don't have "free speech rights" on the job. Nor does your employer have to tolerate improper behavior on your part while you're not at work.

Finally, America is standing up. And you dumshits are finally finding out that you not listening when people tell you to knock it off isn't a good idea.
Click to expand...
I urge you to go visit TikTok and look up TizzyEnt, Danesh and JenHamilton.
They probably together attract more right wing hatred than Hillary Clinton.

TizzyEnt and Danesh specialize in finding out who these anonymous cretins are that terrorized women when they think they can get away with it. The unemployment rate for the guys (and women) they find is virtually 100%.

JenHamilton is a labor and delivery nurse with a huge following. She posted one....ONE....post about how she was horrified at the suffering going on related to children in Gaza and got hammered in the comments by the "Christian right".

She grew up in an evangelical household. She smiled, turned the other cheek and replied with one single sentence: "Read the red words".

That was enough to send the Christian right into foaming-at-the-mouth apocalyptic fury. Her detractors shrieked HOW DARE YOU!. They complained to TikTok that she was running a "religious hate account" and got her suspended. A 250,000 person petition got her suspension voided within 3 day.

They next went "full-derpy" and contacted her employer "do you know you have an 'antiChristian antisemite" working for you"? Her employer just laughed at them.

So they went to the ultraconservative Indiana State Board of Nursing. The Nursing Board turns a blind eye to antisemitism but yanked her license for six weeks while they "investigated" her "anti-Christian" beliefs. She could not work in her chosen profession because of butthurt MAGA evangelicals.

So she partnered during those six weeks with a clothing company and made t-shirts and hoodies that simply said
"Read the Red Words"

Grossed $50K during her MAGA suspension.
 
AnomalyLady said:
Now, I said thank you. I honestly didn't think you were capable of answering a question with a direct answer. I am kinda shocked.
Click to expand...
Why would you think that? Have any of my posts been lies? Do I seem like someone who is a cowardly little bitch and won't stand by his words?

Charlie had every right to spew his hate at the youth.
 
DeluxAuto said:
Why would you think that?
Click to expand...
You said fuck off but I guess you are pausing that comment.

My impression of you is you have a lot of hatred.
DeluxAuto said:
Have any of my posts been lies?
Click to expand...
I do not recall whether your posts have been lies or not.
DeluxAuto said:
Do I seem like someone who is a cowardly little bitch and won't stand by his words?
Click to expand...
I don't know whether you would stand by your words but I did not expect you to answer a direct question.
DeluxAuto said:
Charlie had every right to spew his hate at the youth.
Click to expand...
We agree that Charlie Kirk and all other Americans are granted the 1st amendment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Oyster69
King Charles III invited Trump to UK for State Visit
2
Replies
42
Views
764
Fuzzy1975
F
Bodington
Sean Charles Dunn
2
Replies
33
Views
387
wallstreetguy
W
JohnEngelman
Charles Murray and the Atlantic magazine
Replies
3
Views
77
ll74
ll74
JohnEngelman
"Jewish Genius," by Charles Murray
Replies
24
Views
275
wallstreetguy
W
Baztrachian
UK free speech crackdown sees up to 30 people a day arrested for petty offenses such as retweets and cartoons
2 3
Replies
59
Views
787
Baztrachian
Baztrachian
Back
Top