Zero stories ...why

Actually 13. He was in prison for 8 years.

None were heinous crimes.

If you are busted for stealing, how many times should you steal before being put in prison for life?

If he's out away for 8 years, is that enough?

apparently not.
 
apparently not.
We should obviously just guess and put people in prison for petty crimes because they might also be future murderers

Or, we could employ more mental health professionals who would have resources to evaluate cases of repeat offenders.

But we've cut funding for that...so never mind.
 
We should obviously just guess and put people in prison for petty crimes because they might also be future murderers

Or, we could employ more mental health professionals who would have resources to evaluate cases of repeat offenders.

But we've cut funding for that...so never mind.

"petty":

  • Robbery with a dangerous weapon (armed robbery): Convicted around 2013–2014; served a five-year prison sentence for this felony violent crime.
  • Felony breaking and entering: Convicted as part of his history of property crimes; contributed to his prior incarceration.
  • Felony larceny: Convicted in 2011 for theft; one of his earliest felony offenses.
  • Communicating threats: Charged in 2013; led to a failure-to-appear warrant after he did not show up for court.
  • Injury to property: Two counts charged in August 2013, alongside the threats warrant; released on bond the same day.
  • Assault on a family member (sister): Arrested shortly after his release from prison in September 2020; involved an altercation at her home in Charlotte.
  • Misuse of 911/emergency system and trespassing: Arrested in January 2025 for repeatedly calling 911 from a hospital during a welfare check, claiming a "man-made substance" was controlling his body (linked to his schizophrenia). He was also charged for being on or near hospital property without authorization. Released on cashless bond by a magistrate judge.
 
"petty":

  • Robbery with a dangerous weapon (armed robbery): Convicted around 2013–2014; served a five-year prison sentence for this felony violent crime.
  • Felony breaking and entering: Convicted as part of his history of property crimes; contributed to his prior incarceration.
  • Felony larceny: Convicted in 2011 for theft; one of his earliest felony offenses.
  • Communicating threats: Charged in 2013; led to a failure-to-appear warrant after he did not show up for court.
  • Injury to property: Two counts charged in August 2013, alongside the threats warrant; released on bond the same day.
  • Assault on a family member (sister): Arrested shortly after his release from prison in September 2020; involved an altercation at her home in Charlotte.
  • Misuse of 911/emergency system and trespassing: Arrested in January 2025 for repeatedly calling 911 from a hospital during a welfare check, claiming a "man-made substance" was controlling his body (linked to his schizophrenia). He was also charged for being on or near hospital property without authorization. Released on cashless bond by a magistrate judge.
Only one assault charge and one threat. And theres no indication of escalation...just repeat criminal acts.

Again, which one of those would a judge or prosecutor decide that he's a threat to society and needs to be permanently imprisoned.

What law would you implement to change this?
 
Only one assault charge and one threat. And theres no indication of escalation...just repeat criminal acts.

Again, which one of those would a judge or prosecutor decide that he's a threat to society and needs to be permanently imprisoned.

What law would you implement to change this?

that's just a sample of his career as a criminal.

at what point do you stop overlooking he needed to stay locked up?
 
that's just a sample of his career as a criminal.
Ok

at what point do you stop overlooking he needed to stay locked up?
My question is what made you think it was overlooked outside of knowing what resulted? You know that he killed someone now. What part of his history and what resources do you believe would've recognized that?
 
that's just a sample of his career as a criminal.

at what point do you stop overlooking he needed to stay locked up?

He'll never admit to doing that because is was all her fault for forcing someone to kill her by being white and female.
 
I can see.

Maybe decarlos was just trying to be like his brother.

I have thoughts on this. I won't voice them because they're petty even if seemingly accurate.

I will say that eventually the Daniel Penny's of the world will eventually get tired of the bullshit. And then there will be Hell To Pay.
 
...I try not to be prejudiced, and to evaluate people on their individual characteristics. I am not always successful. I have never known an Oriental I did not like, so I expect to like them...
There are Negroes who are intelligent and who lack felony convictions and illegitimate children. I respect those Negroes.

How has no one jumped on this...saying he isnt prejudiced and yet using offensive words to two sets of people.

"I aint no racist, but them -insert slur of choice- might be good people if they are smart enough and have kept their noses clean..."
 
How has no one jumped on this...saying he isnt prejudiced and yet using offensive words to two sets of people.

"I aint no racist, but them -insert slur of choice- might be good people if they are smart enough and have kept their noses clean..."


You need to enable your sarcasm font.
 
He'll never admit to doing that because is was all her fault for forcing someone to kill her by being white and female.
Wtf are you talking about?

You can say a murderer should've been caught before they committed the crime. But even repeat offenders of other criminal acts do not necessarily escalate their behavior.

So what system do you apply to address this without going over the top? How many offenses warrants what type of incarceration or other detention? It seems to me, you're wanting more default imprisonment because of possible escalation.

I'd suggest adjusting bail laws first to make more stringent detention. But you also need to accommodate the facility volume increase that would be needed. We already have a backlog of cases all over the US.

As for bB and his perspective, it's clear he wants extreme detention/deportation based on race.
 
You need to enable your sarcasm font.
well, it was used multiple times and using racial slurs...even in sarcasm...doesnt usually go over well with the group the slur is directed toward.

Given the sheer volume of racism on this sub, it was pretty safe to assume it wasnt sarcastic.

That said, this is the net...so using a "/s" is the common way to denote sarcasm.

Lastly, thank you for not being a complete asshat about it as opposed to some common responses from both sides of the aisle.
 
How has no one jumped on this...saying he isnt prejudiced and yet using offensive words to two sets of people.

"I aint no racist, but them -insert slur of choice- might be good people if they are smart enough and have kept their noses clean..."
Martin Luther King, jr used the word "Negro" fifteen times in his "I have a dream speech," so I will use it, thank you very much.

I prefer Orientals to whites, so I am not using the word in a derogtory sense.
 
Martin Luther King, jr used the word "Negro" fifteen times in his "I have a dream speech," so I will use it, thank you very much.

I prefer Orientals to whites, so I am not using the word in a derogtory sense.
And how long ago was that speech? About 60 years ago. Times have changed. What was accedptable then isnt acceptable now. Or do you only use a white bathroom and drinking fountain? Guess what? Blacks can vote now! Women can vote! Oh but wait, they cant manage their own fucking bodies in certain states anymore. Maybe yer right, it is back to 1960 or so again.

Also YOU prefer the term Orientals. The rest of the world that isnt racist has understood its considered offensive.
Maybe l prefer to call you a racist dumbfuck, so I am not using it in the derogatory sense.
 
Martin Luther King, jr used the word "Negro" fifteen times in his "I have a dream speech," so I will use it, thank you very much.

I prefer Orientals to whites, so I am not using the word in a derogtory sense.
Lots of people have used words that were acceptable in the past that aren't acceptable now.

You seem to think if a word is used in history at any point, that it's ok.
 
Back
Top