Zero stories ...why

The only thing you smell is your own shit still in your pants from yesterday.

My opinion of slavery has already been stated in this thread shit for brains.
Yeah, shitferbrains, and I was the very next post calling out your racist ASS out again, but... Acknowledging slavery with the dismissive excuse of, "Golly gee willakers, every race has been enslaved," is not an opinion, just some shit ass statement and IT DOES NOT answer the fuckin direct question I asked your ass. :mad:
 
Your ignoring his blatant racism isn't my issue.

It's clear in his posts.
What has he said that is not true?

Calling someone a racist is name calling. It is not an effort to advance the candid dialogue on race we need to be having. It is an effort to suppress a debate those who use the r word know they will lose.
 
Hey Johnny Engel, you ready to engage in a deep discussion with this rhetoric?

Maybe you can explain how proper negroes deserve reprieve according to your factual sources?

they aren't getting stabbed in the neck.
 
The build towards that eventuality started in the late 70's early 80's when the "community organizer" charlatans derailed the civil rights movement. It's been thirty years creating that hole and it is probably going to take just as long to climb back out.
Be careful how you guys present the facts, you risk incurring the wrath of ROARBAGS. :mad:
 
"Send them back to Africa"


Are you suggesting his comments aren't racist?
"Send them back to Africa" is an opinion; it is not a factual assertion.

I do not use the r word any more than I use the n word. You have called me a racist. By your opinion I am one.
 
"Send them back to Africa" is an opinion; it is not a factual assertion.
Racism isn't a perspective of opinion.
Racism is a belief that a race is inferior or superior at societal norms based on their race.
By your own admission, the value of a person increases or decreases to you, based on their race.

And it's clear bB also uses that perspective openly
I do not use the r word any more than I use the n word. You have called me a racist. By your opinion I am one.
I don't give a shit that you ignore words that are accurate or not because you don't like them.

And yes, you are racist.
 
Hey Johnny Engel, you ready to engage in a deep discussion with this rhetoric?

Maybe you can explain how proper negroes deserve reprieve according to your factual sources?
There are Negroes who are intelligent and who lack felony convictions and illegitimate children. I respect those Negroes.
 
Racism isn't a perspective of opinion.
Racism is a belief that a race is inferior or superior at societal norms based on their race.
By your own admission, the value of a person increases or decreases to you, based on their race.

And it's clear bB also uses that perspective openly

I don't give a shit that you ignore words that are accurate or not because you don't like them.

And yes, you are racist.
I evaluate a race by average qualities found in that race, qualities that can be measured, like average intelligence, and rates of crime and illegitimacy. I find that different races have different average qualities that are important to civilization. I try to avoid using the word "superior" because it asserts that all members of one race are superior to all members of another race. Also, it begs the question of what is meant by "superior."

By your definition I am a racist. I don't care. By my definition you are a sanctimonious virtue signaler. This is the first time I have said that. I hope it will be the last time.
 
There are Negroes who are intelligent and who lack felony convictions and illegitimate children. I respect those Negroes.
So when you have a conversation with a black man, your default mode is not to respect them until you know the answers to these?
 
I evaluate a race by average qualities found in that race, qualities that can be measured, like average intelligence, and rates of crime and illegitimacy. I find that different races have different average qualities. I try to avoid using the word "superior" because it asserts that all members of one race are superior to all members of another race. Also, it begs the question of what is meant by "superior."

By your definition I am a racist. I don't care. By my definition you are a sanctimonious virtue signaler. This is the first time I have said that. I hope it will be the last time.
Yes, you are. Thanks for confirming.

Trying not to use certain words because people may take it the wrong way is a tell, not a rationalization.

My definition of racist isn't required to conform to yours.
 
So when you have a conversation with a black man, your default mode is not to respect them until you know the answers to these?
Prejudice is the result of previous experience. If proximity to Negroes dispelled prejudice Southern whites would be the least prejudice whites in the United States.

I try not to be prejudiced, and to evaluate people on their individual characteristics. I am not always successful. I have never known an Oriental I did not like, so I expect to like them.

I have learned to take precautions with young black me I do not know unless they are obviuly dressed for work or church. These are precautions I have learned are unnecessary with young men of other races.

I supported the civil rights movement as a child, a teenager, and a young adult. Black criminals have beaten that support out of me.
 
Last edited:
Prejudice is the result of previous experience. If proximity to Negroes dispelled prejudice Southern whites would be the least prejudice whites in the United States.

I try not to be prejudiced, and to evaluate peiple on their individual characteristics.
You didn't answer my question. I asked what you do, not what you try not to do.
 
There are Negroes who are intelligent and who lack felony convictions and illegitimate children. I respect those Negroes.
Those standards are easily applied to all people. Do you reserve them just for black people.

Believe me there are a lot of white men you do not want to have your back turned to on a public transport.
 
You didn't answer my question. I asked what you do, not what you try not to do.
I think I have always answered your question. I will try once again. I evaluate people on the basis of average characteristics characteristic of the race. These evaluations can changer when I learn more about the person.
 
I think I have always answered your question. I will try once again. I evaluate people on the basis of average characteristics characteristic of the race. These evaluations can changer when I learn more about the person.
That is not an answer to my question.

It's a simple yes or no question
 
Those standards are easily applied to all people. Do you reserve them just for black people.

Believe me there are a lot of white men you do not want to have your back turned to on a public transport.
They exist I doubt there are a lot of them.
 

Ignored by media, enabled by Dems: how soft-on-crime policies unleashed murder of Ukrainian refugee​

The murder of Iryna Zarutska and its treatment by Democrats and mainstream media highlight the interplay between systemic issues in the justice system, a leftist ideology on policing and criminal justice, and a media complicit in hiding those issues from the public.

By Amanda Head
Published: September 9, 2025 11:01pm

According to most legacy mainstream news outfits, the horrific murder of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska was not worthy of a headline. The attention from "MAGA influencers seeking to elevate the issue of violent urban crime and accuse mainstream media of under-covering" is instead the focal point of reporting by outlets like Axios.

On August 22, Iryna Zarutska, a 23-year-old Ukrainian refugee who escaped war to start anew in the U.S., was viciously stabbed to death with a pocket knife in what appeared to be a random attack on a Charlotte, North Carolina light rail train. The suspect, 34-year-old Decarlos Brown Jr., a homeless black man with a long history of evading serious charges due to mental health claims, was apprehended and charged with first-degree murder, fueling public outrage over lax crime policies and judicial failures.

The media blackout was shocking to many in the independent news sphere. The murder took place two and a half weeks ago, on August 22. CNN, Reuters, The New York Times, Associated Press, NBC News, ABC News and The Washington Post took 17 days to report on it. It took North Carolina's Democrat Mayor Josh Stein the same amount of time to comment on the murder.

Wikipedia is under fire for trying to remove a page about the murder. Editors at the site are feuding internally after attempts to suppress the story by proposing the newly created page about Zarutska's killing be deleted, arguing it lacked sufficient notability for inclusion.

https://justthenews.com/nation/crim...e-policies-unleashed-murder-ukrainian-refugee
 
He was let back onto the streets 14 times by Democrats.
Actually 13. He was in prison for 8 years.

None were heinous crimes.

If you are busted for stealing, how many times should you steal before being put in prison for life?

If he's out away for 8 years, is that enough?
 
Back
Top