I was pointing out an observation. Nowhere in my post was there insult or verbal aggression towards you. You're response was the exact opposite of what you complained of, the absence civil discourse. Now you're trying to be cute.
See, you've gotta understand, talkin' to someone and straight-up sayin' they've lost their marbles, it's a bit of a low blow. It's like hittin' below the belt, innit?You're not quite all there, are ya?
Well, if you ever visit the east end you may consider not to call the locals cute.
Listen up, this is a proper serious one, so pay attention. Makin' a joke at the expense of an old geezer, especially if he's a bit confused with the old brainbox, well, that's not just a bit of a laugh—it's a real low-down, gutless move.He'll be fine. He's ancient and never leaves his assisted facility.
Then there are those one might imagine as an intellectual sadist of politics, a guy who reloads with census tables instead of bullets and fires off court precedents like hollow points. He doesn’t argue; he ambushes. Every post is a drive-by of data and opinionated fire designed to leave his opponents clutching their talking points like a wounded Democrat grabbing his wounded butt. He doesn’t care if they agree; he cares if they suffer, because nothing brings him joy like watching a smug partisan choking on a fact they can’t spin.
Jesus fucking christ Reichguide. You and a fact have never been in the same room together. Ever.Then there are those one might imagine as an intellectual sadist of politics, a guy who reloads with census tables instead of bullets and fires off court precedents like hollow points. He doesn’t argue; he ambushes. Every post is a drive-by of data and opinionated fire designed to leave his opponents clutching their talking points like a wounded Democrat grabbing his wounded butt. He doesn’t care if they agree; he cares if they suffer, because nothing brings him joy like watching a smug partisan choking on a fact they can’t spin.
With Love
RG
You are the last person qualified to have judged such a matter one way or the other.
Thank you for the respect you hold for old geezers. I'm sure them old geezers will find a way to forgive your obvious intellectual shortcomings. Mindless palavering has a way of exposing youthful ignorance. Mocking intelligent dialogue is soooo you!
Noble sentiment. You remind me of Sisyphus with that boulder pushing it up the mountain.I like to win arguments without resorting to the insults, name calling, and obscene words often directed to me, and the threats of violence I occasionally receive.
I am confident in my ability to prevail in an environment that respects knowledge, civility, and rational thinking.
Repetitive lie. Your usual go-to rant. You have a lot in common with Pinocchio.
Unless your tapeworm is back, I suggest you consider refraining from the "Royal 'We'", Queenie.We have to suffer fools like yourself and we're not runnng away crying.
dolf remembers when you were vetteman and how you ran from this place because you thought isis was going to track you down through your posts here and torture you for your intimate knowledge of vietnam era war plans.Then there are those one might imagine as an intellectual sadist of politics, a guy who reloads with census tables instead of bullets and fires off court precedents like hollow points. He doesn’t argue; he ambushes. Every post is a drive-by of data and opinionated fire designed to leave his opponents clutching their talking points like a wounded Democrat grabbing his wounded butt. He doesn’t care if they agree; he cares if they suffer, because nothing brings him joy like watching a smug partisan choking on a fact they can’t spin.
With Love
RG
The irony here is that JohnEngelman (aka LaTrouvere) routinely celebrates ACTS of violence against innocent civilians he disagrees with, but as soon as a THREAT of violence comes his way, he immediately calls for his fainting couch.I like to win arguments without resorting to the insults, name calling, and obscene words often directed to me, and the threats of violence I occasionally receive.
I am confident in my ability to prevail in an environment that respects knowledge, civility, and rational thinking.
Where did that come from? Lol.
I think the Israelis should be able to defend themselves from Hamas and other Palestinians.
I do not profile people based on skin color, but on average intelligence and rates of crime and illegitimacy. East Asians score better on those criteria than my own race. I also admire Jews although I am a Gentile.He'll get it when he's earned it.
He's a racist who touts profiling people based on skin color.
So, I'll profile him based on carbon dating. Fair is fair.
Ah, you missed the twist in the words... she played you and you didn't catch the turning of her words on your dig. Well, we can't all be as sharp-witted as Anna.You're not quite all there, are ya?
ChatGPT should be quoted as well, even when it reads your thoughts for you.Then there are those one might imagine as an intellectual sadist of politics, a guy who reloads with census tables instead of bullets and fires off court precedents like hollow points. He doesn’t argue; he ambushes. Every post is a drive-by of data and opinionated fire designed to leave his opponents clutching their talking points like a wounded Democrat grabbing his wounded butt. He doesn’t care if they agree; he cares if they suffer, because nothing brings him joy like watching a smug partisan choking on a fact they can’t spin.
With Love
RG
Rather than call me a racist, please explain how a belief I have is not true. I do not claim to be infallible. I am grateful to someone who expands my knowledge by proving that one of my assertions is invalid.
I am very qualified. I am a scientist. I only make statements of fact based on solid proof.
We all remember that.
