It's Time For The DOJ To Go After Bill Barr

[Rightguide]

I do. Plenty of investigations have.occurred.

But another one should be fun for you to be upset over

The AG didn't determine anything except that Trump told her to initiate.multiple investigations to satisfy his delusions.

You're acting like a child. Get serious.

 

[ll74]

You're acting like a child. Get serious.

The investigations are the result of.dear leader man baby who needs to.punish those who don't give him adequate praise. That is a serious assessment.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You're acting like a child. Get serious.

Speaking of children why do you think the DOJ should go after Barr and not those in the Epstein files?

 

[Rightguide]

The investigations are the result of.dear leader man baby who needs to.punish those who don't give him adequate praise. That is a serious assessment.

Yes, because every grand jury investigation is obviously just a toddler throwing a tantrum over not getting enough applause. Who knew national legal processes were actually playground popularity contests, next you'll be telling us the Supreme Court rules based on who throws the best cocktail party.

 

[rainsol]

Lol
Youre joking, right?
How many people have been fired from the DoJ and why were they fired? How many from the FBI?
And what do they all have in common?
Mueller, Jan 6, Russia.

Are you suggesting that this does not represent people being fired for not falling in line with 47?

Falling in line with 47 or following the laws of the country ?

 

[ll74]

Yes, because every grand jury investigation is obviously just a toddler throwing a tantrum over not getting enough applause.

What grand jury investigation?
The DoJ is investigating.

Who knew national legal processes were actually playground popularity contests, next you'll be telling us the Supreme Court rules based on who throws the best cocktail party.

The DoJ is targeting political enemies at the request of dear leader. This was a campaign promise fulfilled.

Didn't you cry about unjustified investigations recently about something? Those legal processes.

 

[ll74]

Falling in line with 47 or following the laws of the country ?

Lol..... everything is for dear leader.

 

[Rightguide]

What grand jury investigation?
The DoJ is investigating.

The DoJ is targeting political enemies at the request of dear leader. This was a campaign promise fulfilled.

Didn't you cry about unjustified investigations recently about something? Those legal processes.

AG Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama officials over Trump-Russia 2016 collusion investigation​

John Bowden
Mon, August 4, 2025 at 4:11 PM PDT

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/ag-pam-bondi-orders-grand-215820278.html

This is what you need to read.

 

[ll74]

AG Pam Bondi orders grand jury probe of Obama officials over Trump-Russia 2016 collusion investigation​

John Bowden
Mon, August 4, 2025 at 4:11 PM PDT

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/ag-pam-bondi-orders-grand-215820278.html

This is what you need to read.

Got it.. and is the grand jury requred to return an indictment?

 

[Rightguide]

DOJ investigating N.Y. AG's office and Sen. Adam Schiff​

A "special attorney" is investigating the prominent Trump opponents on mortgage fraud allegations, while federal prosecutors are probing Letitia James' office, sources tell NBC News.

Aug. 8, 2025, 7:49 AM PDT / Updated Aug. 8, 2025, 6:01 PM PDT
By Ryan J. Reilly, Jonathan Dienst, Tom Winter, Vaughn Hillyard and Dareh Gregorian

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi has appointed a “special attorney” to probe mortgage fraud allegations against Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James, two administration officials told NBC News.

The Justice Department is also in the initial stages of an investigation of James over her successful civil fraud case against President Donald Trump, according to three people familiar with the matter.

Bondi tapped Ed Martin, a conservative activist and former interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., as special attorney to investigate Schiff and James, both prominent Democratic opponents of the president, the two administration officials said.

A senior law enforcement official said a grand jury seated in the Eastern District of Virginia will investigate the James mortgage fraud allegations and a grand jury in Maryland will investigate the allegations against Schiff.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...gs-office-brought-fraud-case-trump-rcna223731

A federal investigation is a lot like a rectal exam — uncomfortable, invasive, and no matter how much you squirm or protest, eventually someone’s got to check what’s really going on back there. The only difference? At least the doctor might offer a lube, the feds don’t bother with pleasantries. Schiff is one asshole that deserves every inch of his examination.

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

Being a citizen rather than a government employee doesn't absolve him of participation in the conspiracy.

If I wanted to get together with a group of like minded people to investigate suspected criminal activity of a potential 2028 Democratic candidate we don’t want winning the White House, it would be an illegal conspiracy to conduct a private investigation of the candidate?

 

[HisArpy]

If I wanted to get together with a group of like minded people to investigate suspected criminal activity of a potential 2028 Democratic candidate we don’t want winning the White House, it would be an illegal conspiracy to conduct a private investigation of the candidate?

That's not what they did. Nor was the investigation "private."

What these people did was formulate a plan whereby the members of the secret group would clandestinely use the power of the government to fabricate evidence as a predicate for searching/arresting/indicting someone to prevent that person from being able to win the election, or in the event that person did win, not be able to be sworn into the office.

 

[dmallord]

If I wanted to get together with a group of like minded people to investigate suspected criminal activity of a potential 2028 Democratic candidate we don’t want winning the White House, it would be an illegal conspiracy to conduct a private investigation of the candidate?

Based on Rightguide's viewpoint about Schiff as someone who spearheaded an investigation of Trump, you may be investigated for your efforts, and possibly deported, legal citizen or not. It wouldn't be about a legal issue just that you pissed off Trump in doing so.

Are you prepared, as Righty says, to be subjected to a federal investigation, which is a lot like a rectal exam — uncomfortable, invasive, and no matter how much you squirm or protest, eventually, a Republican appointed legal beagle is going to check what’s really going on back there. The only difference? At least the doctor might offer a lube; the Trump administration doesn’t bother with lube or pleasantries. Babyboom would undoubtedly be one asshole that deserves every inch of his examination while in Trump's crosshairs, according to Righty's justifications.

Sure as shit it's different than under Joe's office, where you could express an opinion and he'd just grin at you, probably, not ship you off to Alligator Alcatraz.

Let's not 'if' let's push your initiative and take some action, Boomer.

 

[dmallord]

That's not what they did. Nor was the investigation "private."

What these people did was formulate a plan whereby the members of the secret group would clandestinely use the power of the government to fabricate evidence as a predicate for searching/arresting/indicting someone to prevent that person from being able to win the election, or in the event that person did win, not be able to be sworn into the office.

Wow. Mr. Lawyer, you forgot to use the word 'allegedly' since there has been no investigation, no trial, no sentencing and no evidence presented.

You got those Epstein-type of files ready to display? The public is waiting for the reveal, you know.

By the way, none of what you talked about here took place, nor was any of that public, as you said.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

If I wanted to get together with a group of like minded people to investigate suspected criminal activity of a potential 2028 Democratic candidate we don’t want winning the White House, it would be an illegal conspiracy to conduct a private investigation of the candidate?

Why do you think the DOJ should be investigating this instead of the Epstein files?

 

[BabyBoomer50s]

That's not what they did. Nor was the investigation "private."

What these people did was formulate a plan whereby the members of the secret group would clandestinely use the power of the government to fabricate evidence as a predicate for searching/arresting/indicting someone to prevent that person from being able to win the election, or in the event that person did win, not be able to be sworn into the office.

All I’ve seen in this thread is a handwritten page that apparently are notes from a phone call among private citizens with no authority to direct any government agency to do anything. Sounds like they were hoping they’d get the government to help them, but hope isn’t a crime. Did I miss something?

BTW, Liz Cheney and the Democrats impeached Trump in January, 2021 over J6 in hopes of keeping him from being re-elected. It didn’t end well for them. Jack Smith tried too. Didn’t end well for him either.

 

[HisArpy]

All I’ve seen in this thread is a handwritten page that apparently are notes from a phone call among private citizens with no authority to direct any government agency to do anything. Sounds like they were hoping they’d get the government to help them, but hope isn’t a crime. Did I miss something?

BTW, Liz Cheney and the Democrats impeached Trump in January, 2021 over J6 in hopes of keeping him from being re-elected. It didn’t end well for them. Jack Smith tried too. Didn’t end well for him either.

If all you're relying on is this thread, you're missing a lot of information.

 

[rainsol]

Lol..... everything is for dear leader.

So as I understand it, your ok with corruption in our federal government

 

[ll74]

So as I understand it, your ok with corruption in our federal government

I don't doubt that is what you think I mean.

Autocracies are corrupt.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
Do you really need secret planning to prosecute people who stormed your national capitol and killed people?

The only person "killed" that day was a female protester.

I'm sure Brian Sicknick will appreciate you discarding him because he died in hospital the next day!

On the other hand, if a policeman had died at the hands of a "woke" mob, well, I suspect you'd have been less eager to split hairs?

 

[Rightguide]

I'm sure Brian Sicknick will appreciate you discarding him because he died in hospital the next day!

On the other hand, if a policeman had died at the hands of a "woke" mob, well, I suspect you'd have been less eager to split hairs?

He wasn’t “killed” by anyone, he died of a heart attack. And “the next day” is not the same as “that day.” Learn to be precise with your words, or you’re just volunteering to be roasted...again.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
I'm sure Brian Sicknick will appreciate you discarding him because he died in hospital the next day!

On the other hand, if a policeman had died at the hands of a "woke" mob, well, I suspect you'd have been less eager to split hairs?

He wasn’t “killed” by anyone, he died of a heart attack. And “the next day” is not the same as “that day.” Learn to be precise with your words, or you’re just volunteering to be roasted...again.

I didn't dispute your weaselly use of the phrasing "that day." The police officer was assaulted by a mob that invaded the U.S. Capitol. He suffered two strokes and died the next day. He was killed by a MAGA mob. MAGA is murderers and seditionists and insurrectionists. If a woke mob had attacked the White House and a policeman defending Donald Trump had died you wouldn't have swept that under the rug if he died the next day, rather than the day of the attack, now would you?

 

[Rightguide]

I didn't dispute your weaselly use of the phrasing "that day." The police officer was assaulted by a mob that invaded the U.S. Capitol. He suffered two strokes and died the next day. He was killed by a MAGA mob. MAGA is murderers and seditionists and insurrectionists. If a woke mob had attacked the White House and a policeman defending Donald Trump had died you wouldn't have swept that under the rug if he died the next day, rather than the day of the attack, now would you?

Who was charged with his murder? It was you who made the stupid assertion that he was "killed" that day.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
I didn't dispute your weaselly use of the phrasing "that day." The police officer was assaulted by a mob that invaded the U.S. Capitol. He suffered two strokes and died the next day. He was killed by a MAGA mob. MAGA is murderers and seditionists and insurrectionists. If a woke mob had attacked the White House and a policeman defending Donald Trump had died you wouldn't have swept that under the rug if he died the next day, rather than the day of the attack, now would you?

Who was charged with his murder? It was you who made the stupid assertion that he was "killed" that day.

So you admit a MAGA mob whipped up by Donald Trump caused the death of a policeman and you're trying to weasel out of it by saying he didn't die immediately?

 

[HisArpy]

So you admit a MAGA mob whipped up by Donald Trump caused the death of a policeman and you're trying to weasel out of it by saying he didn't die immediately?

Lol, he died of a heart attack the next day. His death was determined to NOT be caused by the riot on J6.

Please stop puking the lies you've been fed.