Comshaw
VAGITARIAN
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2000
- Posts
- 12,013
Sight, site, my bad. A nice play on words BTW.Yes, there are quite a few sex "sights" on this site for sure. You might as well post a photo of a TR4 for context. I would do it, but the thread has already drifted a lot. Not just drifted, shoved miles off course. I know, I am responsible for that too.
I'll never understand why there is so much insistence on staying "on topic" and not "hijacking" the conversation during such a discussion. To me it's just like a nice party. A bunch of people standing around talking, with several conversations on different subjects going on at one time. For my 2 cents, a demand to only discuss the OP's post smacks just a bit of OCD.
As to a picture of a TR4:
![1964_triumph_tr4_1593021448c5e8f93aad47a120200203_135600[1].jpg 1964_triumph_tr4_1593021448c5e8f93aad47a120200203_135600[1].jpg](https://forumfast.litimgs.com/data/attachments/1083/1083975-52b9df080a62f81f3ba25b5cf94e92f0.jpg)
Mine is (I still have it although in a disassembled condition) actually a 1962 model. There were just over 4000 out of the total of 40,000, TR4's produced in '62. I'd have to run out and look but the body number of mine is in the 3000 range.
Comshaw
Last edited: