Nudity policy

The site owners are far more concerned with their bottom line than 'art'.

Frankly I suggest that many of the contributors to this very forum, in their embracing of computer generation and other false forms of 'creativity', have brought it all upon themselves.

Just a shame that that they've brought down the very few true talents here along with them as a collateral damage.
 
They archived my 3 pieces I posted on my page... only one had nudity... so, no art anymore?!
Correct. All illustrated submissions have been or are being archived. The reason given is to do with the site not wanting to get involved in age verification for visually oriented social media sites. By shutting down such content I suspect the site is protecting itself from recent legislation in many states/countries.
 
The site owners are far more concerned with their bottom line than 'art'.

Frankly I suggest that many of the contributors to this very forum, in their embracing of computer generation and other false forms of 'creativity', have brought it all upon themselves.

Just a shame that that they've brought down the very few true talents here along with them as a collateral damage.
Yeah, I actually studied art in college and continued to draw after graduating. I used to always find erotica in art or even the more scandalous images in modern art to be jaw dropping. I wanted to share this experience here. I drew digitally (so much easier to clean and transfer over to share), but never used those computer 3D models,. especially those AI Generated images (where is the fun in that?). There is a Literotica Artist page now on Reddit. Thank goodness. It's a shame to, I was working on an illustrated version of older ADULT couples story involving consenting couples on this site for an author, now I'm not sure how to approach this.
 
The site owners are far more concerned with their bottom line than 'art'.

Frankly I suggest that many of the contributors to this very forum, in their embracing of computer generation and other false forms of 'creativity', have brought it all upon themselves.

Just a shame that that they've brought down the very few true talents here along with them as a collateral damage.
It's very ignorant to say that "computer generation" (by that I assume you mean AI?) is false creativity. You can have a creative imagination without having an ability to physically do it yourself. is Stephen Spielberg talentless because he didn't computer generate the effects or hand make the dinosaur models on Jurassic Park himself?? no, he just directs/instructs, or "prompts" if you will, others to do it for him, to create his vision.
 
It's very ignorant to say that "computer generation" (by that I assume you mean AI?) is false creativity. You can have a creative imagination without having an ability to physically do it yourself. is Stephen Spielberg talentless because he didn't computer generate the effects or hand make the dinosaur models on Jurassic Park himself?? no, he just directs/instructs, or "prompts" if you will, others to do it for him, to create his vision.

Steven Spielberg’s talents are directing, producing, and writing. He partners with phenomenal artists to create the effects and the dinosaurs. Those artists are real people who are credited for their work. Your comparison doesn’t make sense.

AI art is not equivalent to artwork created by the hands of artists. It is certainly some type of art, but a different genre, and one that steals from artists.
 
is Stephen Spielberg talentless because he didn't computer generate the effects or hand make the dinosaur models on Jurassic Park himself?? no, he just directs/instructs, or "prompts" if you will, others to do it for him, to create his vision.
Those were other people, though. Creative professionals, not AI.

I understand that your point is about whether Spielberg was creative or not, but this is a horrible way to make it.
 
Judging by the fact that the screws are being tightened all over the world, soon the rules of this site will state that genitals and sex itself cannot be indicated in texts. It would be funny if it weren't not funny.
I'm still optimistic and think that the more the screws are tightened, the more people will raise their voice and protest against rules that go too far. I get the point that the Internet, once a place to share knowledge and ideas from a few advantaged users, has almost become the far west as more and more people and companies have taken over it, and that some regulations are necessary, and that regulating is not easy... but after a trial and error, I hope that things that shouldn't have been changed stay as they were.
 
Back
Top