Peter Strzok Deletes His X Account And Scrubs The Wayback Machine

[Rightguide]

My my. I wonder what's up?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1949842711021814272

https://twitter.com/x/status/1949803706674729377

Looks like Kash is getting close...

 

[ll74]

Lol

 

[pinkparkhorse]

Somebody’s in trouble.

 

[Rightguide]

Somebody’s in trouble.

It looks like the DOJ's newly established "Strike Force" is off to a running start.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Looks like Kash is getting close...

For years Kash said the Epstein list was real and many prominent Dems are all over them. Now, he says the don't exist.

Are you shitfaced again?

 

[Lazaran]

For years Kash said the Epstein list was real and many prominent Dems are all over them. Now, he says the don't exist.

Are you shitfaced again?

The phrase “shitfaced again” suggests that Rightard is sometimes sober…

 

[ll74]

I'm sure the outcome will go exactly as the OP expects.

 

[HisArpy]

It looks like the DOJ's newly established "Strike Force" is off to a running start.

Yeah and I don't think him scrubbing the internet is going to help him because that evidence he just tried to destroy is probably already printed out into hardcopy.

 

[DeluxAuto]

It looks like the DOJ's newly established "Strike Force" is off to a running start.

A felon in the White House who is going down with the Epstein list.

Start there.

 

[DeluxAuto]

Yeah and I don't think him scrubbing the internet is going to help him because that evidence he just tried to destroy is probably already printed out into hardcopy.

Would a print of a tweet that cannot be tracked to the alleged tweet be admissable in court?

 

[Rightguide]

For years Kash said the Epstein list was real and many prominent Dems are all over them. Now, he says the don't exist.

Are you shitfaced again?

I'm not like you. I don't drink. What list was that, his address book, or his client list? Alan Dershowitz, Epstien's former attorney, says documents are being sequestered by a judge. Most likely because it involves Grand Jury information. Take a listen:

 

[Rightguide]

Yeah and I don't think him scrubbing the internet is going to help him because that evidence he just tried to destroy is probably already printed out into hardcopy.

I've read as well that it does exist and can be subpoenaed. Maybe X servers long term backups.

 

[DeluxAuto]

I'm not like you.

No fucking shit, muppet.

I don't drink.

Your dumbfuckery has no excuse.

What list was that, his address book, or his client list?

The list that has been on Bondi's desk for months, Jack. The list Kash and Bondingdong based their entire podcast careers on before they were anointed heads of the FBI to shut them up.

That list, dipshit.

 

[HisArpy]

I've read as well that it does exist and can be subpoenaed. Maybe X servers long term backups.

Verified copies are probably already in the file that Tulsi gave to the DOJ.

The thing is; Strzok just tried to destroy evidence. He has to know that the tweets he just deleted are part of the prior investigation already done by the FBI/DOJ and already the subject of a subpoena. Oopsies.

 

[icanhelp1]

My my. I wonder what's up?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1949842711021814272

https://twitter.com/x/status/1949803706674729377

Looks like Kash is getting close...

That fucking scumbag traitor should be in jail.

 

[pinkparkhorse]

That fucking scumbag traitor should be in jail.

Hell yes

 

[Lazaran]

“A lot of people are saying” DonOld Trump blocked the release of the unredacted JEFFREY EPSTEIN files and is obstructing the investigation by coordinating / negotiating with Ghislaine Maxwell over a quid pro quo that includes a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell in exchange for favorable testimony about DonOld’s relationship with JEFFREY EPSTEIN, and unfavorable testimony about DonOld’s enemies.



We. Told. Them. So.

 

[HisArpy]

Would a print of a tweet that cannot be tracked to the alleged tweet be admissable in court?

The tweets were already subject to a subpoena from the FBI in the last investigation into Strzok's connection with the Russia-gate hoax. Deleting them is destruction of evidence.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The tweets were already subject to a subpoena from the FBI in the last investigation into Strzok's connection with the Russia-gate hoax. Deleting them is destruction of evidence.

That wasn't my question. I should ask an attorney.

 

[DeluxAuto]

That fucking scumbag traitor should be in jail.

Coming from the resident traitor

 

[ll74]

Verified copies are probably already in the file that Tulsi gave to the DOJ.

The thing is; Strzok just tried to destroy evidence. He has to know that the tweets he just deleted are part of the prior investigation already done by the FBI/DOJ and already the subject of a subpoena. Oopsies.

He doesn't own the tweets, X does. And they also have backups. He can "delete" all he wants...they were never his locally.

More than likely all of his social media posts are already part of the record somewhere.

 

[icanhelp1]

The tweets were already subject to a subpoena from the FBI in the last investigation into Strzok's connection with the Russia-gate hoax. Deleting them is destruction of evidence.

Ya mean like what Hillary did?

 

[icanhelp1]

Coming from the resident traitor

yOu nEeD nEw MaTeRiAl

 

[DeluxAuto]

yOu nEeD nEw MaTeRiAl

I don't speak traitorese.

 

[Lazaran]

Ya mean like what Hillary did?

EXACTLY “like what Hillary did” - because "HILLARY!!!" did NOTHING wrong (prosecutable) either.



Meanwhile:

DonOld DID commit prosecutable crimes (and DonOld WAS convicted), and DonOld DID have a "special" relationship with JEFFREY EPSTEIN & GHISLAINE MAXWELL.



ineedhelp1



We. Told. Them. So.