The FO'd, and now they will FA.

[1984X2024]

Forget quiet, back-channel diplomatic communications. President Trump grabbed a bullhorn, walked into the center of a mass of people, and blasted five words that reverberated off the walls:


"Take it or leave it!"

Twelve countries will receive letters from the president tomorrow, notifying them that their 90-day grace period is about to expire, much like a person realizing too late that their coffee was not decaf.

If they miss their July 9 cutoff, tariffs of up to 70 percent will hit them like a falling piano on a sidewalk.

The FO'd, and now they will FA.

 

[DeluxAuto]

The FO'd,

What?

 

[ll74]

Wtf are you talking about?

 

[DeluxAuto]

Wtf are you talking about?

The F.O.D.
Yeah, you know me
You down with F.O.D?
Who's down with F.O.D?
Yeah, all bBs!

 

[Rebel5soul]

*chuckle* The days of stalling and fumbling about are over. They obviously thought it was going to be business as usual and Trump was just posturing. Oh well.

 

[MajorRewrite]

The FO'd, and now they will FA.

They found out, and now they will fuck around??

JFC, you are so mentally disabled.

Also, Trump unilaterally slapped new bigly tariffs on all other nations (except Russia), so it’s all on him, not them.

Donnie continues to fuck around with tariffs and he’s going to “find out” … unless he TACOs again.

 

[ll74]

Two weeks..


TACO

 

[ll74]

In case.you're wondering where bB plagiarized from

https://pjmedia.com/david-manney/20...t-tariff-blitz-is-bigger-than-monday-n4941481

 

[Rightguide]

Wtf are you talking about?

Why are you always the last to have a clue?

 

[ll74]

Why are you always the last to have a clue?

It has nothing to do with my knowledge. It has to do with people posting a source of what they are posting a thread about.

You typically don't get it from me because you always post your source, which I appreciate

 

[DeluxAuto]

Why are you always the last to have a clue?

Are you still tracking down election fraud in Arizona?

 

[Rightguide]

It has nothing to do with my knowledge. It has to do with people posting a source of what they are posting a thread about.

You typically don't get it from me because you always post your source, which I appreciate

Did you miss this and the hyperlink included?

"Twelve countries will receive letters from the president tomorrow, notifying them that their 90-day grace period is about to expire, much like a person realizing too late that their coffee was not decaf.

If they miss their July 9 cutoff, tariffs of up to 70 percent will hit them like a falling piano on a sidewalk."

 

[ll74]

Did you miss this and the hyperlink included?

"Twelve countries will receive letters from the president tomorrow, notifying them that their 90-day grace period is about to expire, much like a person realizing too late that their coffee was not decaf.

If they miss their July 9 cutoff, tariffs of up to 70 percent will hit them like a falling piano on a sidewalk."

That's not the source of the post. Pjmedia is the source.

Fyi - when you copy pasta an article, links are included with urls that it references.

Are you that fucking stupid that you don't understand that?

If you post a thread from a source you are reading, it's imperative that you provide the source for others to read to be able to provide the perspective you agree with to others. If you don't do this, then that means you don't want other people to see the same thing you are reading and would prefer they use their own biased sources, which may disagree with yours and have differing information/context.

 

[Rightguide]

That's not the source of the post. Pjmedia is the source.

Fyi - when you copy pasta an article, links are included with urls that it references.

Are you that fucking stupid that you don't understand that?

If you post a thread from a source you are reading, it's imperative that you provide the source for others to read to be able to provide the perspective you agree with to others. If you don't do this, then that means you don't want other people to see the same thing you are reading and would prefer they use their own biased sources, which may disagree with yours and have differing information/context.

I didn't need a link because I was already familiar with the issue and knew what the issue was. Apparently, you read this,

"Twelve countries will receive letters from the president tomorrow, notifying them that their 90-day grace period is about to expire, much like a person realizing too late that their coffee was not decaf.

If they miss their July 9 cutoff, tariffs of up to 70 percent will hit them like a falling piano on a sidewalk."

And was still had no clue what the issue was.

 

[ll74]

I didn't need a link because I was already familiar with the issue and knew what the issue was. Apparently, you read this,

"Twelve countries will receive letters from the president tomorrow, notifying them that their 90-day grace period is about to expire, much like a person realizing too late that their coffee was not decaf.

If they miss their July 9 cutoff, tariffs of up to 70 percent will hit them like a falling piano on a sidewalk."

And was still had no clue what the issue was.

It's not about the issue familiarity. It's about the media perspective of the issue. The PJ media article provides a perspective on the issue that redstate does not, including context that helps you come to a conclusion.

If I went to CNN, my understanding might be different than yours. If you're the one posting the thread, do you want your perspective to be represented or mine? And if I'm discussing the topic, wouldn't you want me to understand your views including the source of that information?

When someone plagerizes an article, why should I trust anything they are presenting as their own opinion?

 

[Bray123]

Does that list include the Heard and McDonald Islands? Those freeloading penguins can go catch their own fish, there's no need to depend on Trump-Subsidies.

 

[Rightguide]

It's not about the issue familiarity. It's about the media perspective of the issue. The PJ media article provides a perspective on the issue that redstate does not, including context that helps you come to a conclusion.

If I went to CNN, my understanding might be different than yours. If you're the one posting the thread, do you want your perspective to be represented or mine? And if I'm discussing the topic, wouldn't you want me to understand your views including the source of that information?

When someone plagerizes an article, why should I trust anything they are presenting as their own opinion?

Your response was, "Wtf are you talking about?" When it was perfectly clear what the subject was. The President warned about coming tariffs at levels of 70% three days ago:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/04/business/tariff-letters-trump

 

[ll74]

Your response was, "Wtf are you talking about?" When it was perfectly clear what the subject was. The President warned about coming tariffs at levels of 70% three days ago:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/04/business/tariff-letters-trump

Yes, I asked for a source of information because they did not provide the one they copy pasted from.

What part of that is something you disagree with? Should the OP not post their source and if so, why? Is it because they deserve to be lazy?

When someone else delivers an argument, do they have any responsibility to provide a source for that argument?

 

[HisArpy]

Your response was, "Wtf are you talking about?" When it was perfectly clear what the subject was. The President warned about coming tariffs at levels of 70% three days ago:

https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/04/business/tariff-letters-trump

You're talking to a guy who has clearly stated in the past that he watches multiple sources of news and information daily, including conservative sites.

All that, yet SOMEHOW, he's still a jackwagon without a clue. The guy's a walking, talking, imbecile.

 

[ll74]

You're talking to a guy who has clearly stated in the past that he watches multiple sources of news and information daily, including conservative sites.

All that, yet SOMEHOW, he's still a jackwagon without a clue.

So you have an issue with expecting a thread starter providing their source of information?

Odd take for a lawyer

What's your position on plagiarism?

 

[HisArpy]

So you have an issue with expecting a thread starter providing their source of information?

Odd take for a lawyer

What's your position on plagiarism?

I have an issue with IDIOTS who come here and troll the board trying to stir controversy by being purposefully ignorant (or lying) and trying to FORCE people to submit to their personal idea of what the board should be and look like.

This ain't your website dudly. Get a fucking clue.

 

[ll74]

I have an issue with IDIOTS who come here and troll the board trying to stir controversy by being purposefully ignorant (or lying) and trying to FORCE people to submit to their personal idea of what the board should be and look like.

So you don't have an expectation of sources provided by a thread.starter.

Got it

This ain't your website dudly. Get a fucking clue.

I can see it now - the arpy court case - "dear.jury, here is my argument. Google it. I rest my case"

 

[MajorRewrite]

The MAGA sheep in this thread all found out and fucked around. Mentally disabled 86TintaNoitx2024 said so.

 

[HisArpy]

So you don't have an expectation of sources provided by a thread.starter.

Got it


I can see it now - the arpy court case - "dear.jury, here is my argument. Google it. I rest my case"

As many have said; this ain't no courtroom and you're a doofus for trying to make that argument.

Here's the thing; you're not a child. Start acting like an adult and stop the bullshit.

 

[ll74]

As many have said; this ain't no courtroom and you're a doofus for trying to make that argument.

I like more information not less.

Here's the thing; you're not a child. Start acting like an adult and stop the bullshit.

You can ignore me as you want.

Not my issue.