SCOTUS puts an end

[ll74]

Already off to the races - two new cases filed challenging birthright citizenship EO

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938663837995077777

 

[Rightguide]

So it gets blocked state by state now?

Read the decision in full.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Ah, so the Constitution only applies to the circumstances that existed on the day the amendments were passed (according to Trump).

Undocumented immigrants running from the draft in foreign lands should be deported, including their descendants even unto the fourth generation. That's something we may be able to get behind.

WE ARE NOT TAKING THAT BACK!
You elected it, you keep it.

 

[Rebel5soul]

Already off to the races - two new cases filed challenging birthright citizenship EO

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938663837995077777

They can play all the games they want, but not without consequences.

What you don't seem to understand that Justice Roberts does is that NONE of those inferior courts are constitutionally mandated. Further, congress can cut the shit out of the Courts budget through the reconciliation process. Roberts is acutely aware of the sense of congress and how out of control some of the inferior courts are. I expect him to act out of an attempt to protect the judiciaries integrity and his own powers.

It's FAFO time.

 

[ll74]

They can play all the games they want, but not without consequences.

The case is clear. And it will go back to SCOTUS.

What you don't seem to understand that Justice Roberts does is that NONE of those inferior courts are constitutionally mandated. Further, congress can cut the shit out of the Courts budget through the reconciliation process. Roberts is acutely aware of the sense of congress and how out of control some of the inferior courts are. I expect him to act out of an attempt to protect the judiciaries integrity and his own powers.

It's FAFO time.

Congress....lol......

Roberts won't do anything because Comgress won't do anything to respond to

 

[Rightguide]

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114756160140843373

 

[ll74]

Btw - the EO is going to be blocked within a week.... A month tops

Actually, I think it depends on the shadow docket, which may wait a little longer due to the way it's scheduled.... But as soon as it hits SCOTUS, this is toast

 

[HisArpy]

Already off to the races - two new cases filed challenging birthright citizenship EO

https://twitter.com/x/status/1938663837995077777

It's laughable how they're trying to name the yet to be born as parties.

 

[heathrowinneo]

More like away from Fascism. Read the majority opinion.

We are on our way to fascism. 6 jurists just went for it.

 

[Lance_Castro]

The 9th Circuit has gotten away with being The Self-Proclaimed Progressive Branch of the Gov for a long time.

Had to end eventually!

 

[Rebel5soul]

It's laughable how they're trying to name the yet to be born as parties.

I was wondering whether any real plaintiffs had standing, apparently not.

 

[icanhelp1]

More like away from Fascism. Read the majority opinion.

This ruling should eventually lead to congress doing their job. I believe sooner than later a 3 maybe 5 judge tribunal will be establish to rule and remedy national cases. IMHO

 

[icanhelp1]

The 9th Circuit has gotten away with being The Self-Proclaimed Progressive Branch of the Gov for a long time.

Had to end eventually!

I may be wrong but I believe the 9th circuit can rule on national issues, it's the district court judges that rule outside their lane.

 

[HisArpy]

This ruling should eventually lead to congress doing their job. I believe sooner than later a 3 maybe 5 judge tribunal will be establish to rule and remedy national cases. IMHO

More likely it will necessitate the creation of a pleading standard to establish national jurisdiction. Much like what's required to establish subject matter or personal jurisdiction.

Attempting to plead with non-existing plaintiff's, like what CASA is doing here, is not only stupid but should get them sanctioned for a frivolous filing.

 

[HisArpy]

I may be wrong but I believe the 9th circuit can rule on national issues, it's the district court judges that rule outside their lane.

The circuit appellate courts were also created by Congress. Accordingly they'd be bound by the decision.

 

[icanhelp1]

More likely it will necessitate the creation of a pleading standard to establish national jurisdiction. Much like what's required to establish subject matter or personal jurisdiction.

Attempting to plead with non-existing plaintiff's, like what CASA is doing here, is not only stupid but should get them sanctioned for a frivolous filing.

Maybe this ruling will eliminate forum shopping.

You mean representing babies that haven't been born yet?

 

[HisArpy]

Maybe this ruling will eliminate forum shopping.

I think it will eventually result in the end of wholesale forum shopping, but some forum shopping will still take place. Those with a lawfare agenda will still be able to find judges amenable to their cause who are willing to use their authority to support any national implications in the pleadings to establish a national injunction.

Under the FRCP, for pleading purposes all allegations in the pleadings must be assumed to be true. Thus, an allegation that the suit has national implications because XYZ should be enough to establish national jurisdiction for injunctive purposes.

You mean representing babies that haven't been born yet?

If you read the new CASA pleading they're seeking a class action certification for all children born after Trump took office and all who are yet to be born.

It's completely frivolous because you cannot fashion a remedy for someone who doesn't exist.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

to tyrant judges that want to rule the nation.

Hats off to the court.

This would make it easier to take guns from people.

 

[Rebel5soul]

This would make it easier to take guns from people.

You wish.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You wish.

So you don’t understand the ruling. This ruling would make it easier to take guns.

 

[Rebel5soul]

So you don’t understand the ruling. This ruling would make it easier to take guns.

Yeah, if it wasn't for that pesky 2nd amendment.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Yeah, if it wasn't for that pesky 2nd amendment.

It was for everything. You still don’t understand the ruling.

 

[Rebel5soul]

It was for everything. You still don’t understand the ruling.

Apparently you don't either.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Apparently you don't either.

I do, which is why I’m pointing out you don’t understand it, and how it would be easier to take guns.

If there was an EO to take guns and the NRA sued over it, and was issued an injunction, that injunction would not stop the government from taking your guns.

 

[HisArpy]

I do, which is why I’m pointing out you don’t understand it, and how it would be easier to take guns.

If there was an EO to take guns and the NRA sued over it, and was issued an injunction, that injunction would not stop the government from taking your guns.

Except for those pesky SCOTUS decisions that say otherwise and the 2A...