Actingup
Mostly Harmless
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2018
- Posts
- 1,159
Thanks for the reply. I agree that a name proves nothing. I believe though that many people put great store in their reputation, even under a pseudonym, and a criticism made with the weight of a pseudonym with a reputation is very different from an anonymous criticism, or from a name with a poor reputationUnless someone posts a real name and address (which no one does) we are all anonymous here. Furthermore there is no way of telling an 'alt' account from a 'main'. In fact many people have multi accts and do no designate one as main. So posting anonymously is not cowardly at all.
You want a name on a comment so that you can prove some authenticity but really it proves nothing. Anyone can start an account and comment under that name and it is no more nor less anonymous than your own 'main' account. No stories on that account? That also proves nothing. The vast majority of readers here (ie: our legit audience) only read and do not write. So posting anonymously achieves the same thing as starting a commenting account or even a main reading account.
Are there cowardly commenters out there? No one can ever prove it, so it's pointless to care.
Like I said, there is only one real reason why people get upset at anonymous comments. They need to find a reason to discredit criticism so that they can pretend to be "awesome". People here (and I can name names) will often say, "well if he criticizes, I want to be able to see his writing to see if he knows what he's talking about," but notice that not one single person has ever said on this forum, "someone gave me anonymous glowing praise and I wish I could see their work so I can check if he knows what he's talking about.". Praise is never questioned. ; )