No such place -- it's called "Red Square." And was called that before Communism -- krasniy, the Russian word for "red," used to mean "beautiful."Moscow Square
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No such place -- it's called "Red Square." And was called that before Communism -- krasniy, the Russian word for "red," used to mean "beautiful."Moscow Square
I stand corrected. Meanwhile, my post stands.No such place -- it's called "Red Square." And was called that before Communism -- krasniy, the Russian word for "red," used to mean "beautiful."
Reality is sinking in......“You have to understand, [Putin] had no intention, in my opinion, of settling this war,” he (Trump) said. “I think he wanted the whole thing.”
Says ‘Can’t Guarantee’ Deal to End War in Ukraine
https://www.kyivpost.com/post/47898
Nah, it's really esoteric stuff and hardly anyone knows anything about Indonesia. I do because I spent 2 months there and it was out in a mining town deep in Kalimantan. I had my own bodyguard who was a Kopassus NCO - after he found out I could shoot he took me shooting on the range at the Army camp. LOL. I had an interesting time there and I was fascinated by all the history forever after, so I have quite a collection of books on Indoneasia from the early colonial days right up to the present. I have an older friend from work who's "Dutch" - her grandfather was born there back in WW2 and was a refugee when the Dutch were thrown out - his family had been there for 400 years - anyhow, I am right into the history there and I don't really expect anyone else to know that much about the place.Take it easy on Politruk, you're embarrassing the crap out of him.![]()
Well, you got a lot out of it in two months. Good for you!Nah, it's really esoteric stuff and hardly anyone knows anything about Indonesia. I do because I spent 2 months there and it was out in a mining town deep in Kalimantan. I had my own bodyguard who was a Kopassus NCO - after he found out I could shoot he took me shooting on the range at the Army camp. LOL. I had an interesting time there and I was fascinated by all the history forever after, so I have quite a collection of books on Indoneasia from the early colonial days right up to the present. I have an older friend from work who's "Dutch" - her grandfather was born there back in WW2 and was a refugee when the Dutch were thrown out - his family had been there for 400 years - anyhow, I am right into the history there and I don't really expect anyone else to know that much about the place.
John Mac Ghlionn wrote a great piece for The Hill about the comedian-turned-president:
“Overnight, the media transformed him into the embodiment of courage, the Churchill of Kyiv, the man who refused to flee, the warrior standing against tyranny. But what if this narrative is entirely false? What if Zelensky, rather than being the hero in this story, is actually the man who won’t allow the war to end — not for the good of his people, but because peace would mean his own downfall?”
“It is no coincidence that as Ukraine’s battlefield prospects worsen, as soldiers defect, as forced conscription spirals into something resembling kidnapping, Zelensky has once again extended martial law. No elections. No peace talks. No escape. Because if the war ends, so does his presidency. And this, more than anything, explains why the war must go on.”
“Since Russia’s invasion in 2022, Zelensky had banned several opposition parties, banned certain media outlets and postponed elections with the justification that wartime voting is “impossible.” Impossible for whom? For the soldiers in the trenches, or for the civilians now living under indefinite martial law?
[…] And yet the war must continue. It is the only thing keeping Zelensky in power. If he were to call elections, he would likely lose. Support for him is falling. The longer this drags on, the more obvious it becomes that Ukraine cannot win — not in any meaningful sense. This is not 2022. The optimism of those early months, when the world believed Ukraine might push Russia back, is gone. Even the U.S., Ukraine’s biggest backer, is slowly dialing down support, with Washington insiders admitting that a total Ukrainian victory is no longer the goal.”
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...ensky-can-t-afford-to-end-the-war/ar-AA1z7ICe
So much this. The new administration has literally given Russia leverage it didn't have.
And it's infuriating. All they had to do was keep ammo rolling, heat up another 500 Bradleys and as many Strykers and xfer a hundred old F16's and as many old Warthogs and it's game over for Russia. No need to "negotiate" at all. Words fail me!!!!So much this. The new administration has literally given Russia leverage it didn't have.
Listening to the daily Ukranian pod, they mentioned one aspect of the kidnapping of Ukranian children was to indoctrinate them and then reinforce troops with them, another clear war crime.
And also conscripting UKrainians in the occupied zones, because they're now part of Russia of course. Russians are like evil little children with no concept of right and wrong, and incurable on top of that.Listening to the daily Ukranian pod, they mentioned one aspect of the kidnapping of Ukranian children was to indoctrinate them and then reinforce troops with them, another clear war crime.
Dumb takeThe Embassy
How NATO Helped Seal Ukraine’s Defeat Against Russia
https://www.19fortyfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/danieldavis-100x100.jpg
By
Daniel Davis
Published
2 days ago
https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/02/how-nato-helped-seal-ukraines-defeat-against-russia/#
The NATO Dilemma for Ukraine: On February 25, 2022, one day after Russian troops invaded Ukraine, President Biden declared that “Putin’s aggression against Ukraine will end up costing Russia dearly — economically and strategically. We will make sure of that.” When the war is over and its history written, Biden concluded, “Putin’s choice to make a totally unjustifiable war on Ukraine will have left Russia weaker and the rest of the world stronger.”
Three years later, with Biden off the world stage following his defeat in last year’s presidential election, Putin and Russia are poised to win the war against Ukraine, despite the massive support given by the U.S. and NATO, and will end in a much stronger position.
How could this be? After the United States and Europe gave such extraordinary amounts of money and machines to Ukraine, after 40 nations assembled to support Ukraine against Russia, how could Ukraine have failed to win and how could Russia gotten stronger? Though there are a number of practical reasons, the core reason for this failure is as embarrassing as it is alarming: NATO bases its policies on a narrative while Russia based its policies on ground truth realities.
Lesson number 1 that NATO and the U.S. needs to learn is that wars don’t give a damn about your morality or values. In the minds of most European leaders and establishment figures in the United States, Ukraine was and remains in the moral right; in their rendering, Russia is evil and abhorrent. Russia, therefore, must lose and Ukraine must win, based solely on the mental construct that Russia = evil and Ukraine = good. Yet while European and American establishment figures and mainstream media live in that space, bombs, bullets, and bayonets could care less.
More here: https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/02/how-nato-helped-seal-ukraines-defeat-against-russia/
The Embassy
How NATO Helped Seal Ukraine’s Defeat Against Russia
https://www.19fortyfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/danieldavis-100x100.jpg
By
Daniel Davis
Published
2 days ago
https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/02/how-nato-helped-seal-ukraines-defeat-against-russia/#
The NATO Dilemma for Ukraine: On February 25, 2022, one day after Russian troops invaded Ukraine, President Biden declared that “Putin’s aggression against Ukraine will end up costing Russia dearly — economically and strategically. We will make sure of that.” When the war is over and its history written, Biden concluded, “Putin’s choice to make a totally unjustifiable war on Ukraine will have left Russia weaker and the rest of the world stronger.”
Three years later, with Biden off the world stage following his defeat in last year’s presidential election, Putin and Russia are poised to win the war against Ukraine, despite the massive support given by the U.S. and NATO, and will end in a much stronger position.
How could this be? After the United States and Europe gave such extraordinary amounts of money and machines to Ukraine, after 40 nations assembled to support Ukraine against Russia, how could Ukraine have failed to win and how could Russia gotten stronger? Though there are a number of practical reasons, the core reason for this failure is as embarrassing as it is alarming: NATO bases its policies on a narrative while Russia based its policies on ground truth realities.
Lesson number 1 that NATO and the U.S. needs to learn is that wars don’t give a damn about your morality or values. In the minds of most European leaders and establishment figures in the United States, Ukraine was and remains in the moral right; in their rendering, Russia is evil and abhorrent. Russia, therefore, must lose and Ukraine must win, based solely on the mental construct that Russia = evil and Ukraine = good. Yet while European and American establishment figures and mainstream media live in that space, bombs, bullets, and bayonets could care less.
More here: https://www.19fortyfive.com/2025/02/how-nato-helped-seal-ukraines-defeat-against-russia/