Snopes on USAID

Yeah yeah yeah and when you check their sources, they're other woke media, or they skirt around the truth or they only address half the issue and play deliberately dumb. Nope, Snopes is a waste of space and has an extreme left bias.
If you say so; you can believe what Trump tells you if you want, it's a free country.
 
Yeah yeah yeah and when you check their sources, they're other woke media, or they skirt around the truth or they only address half the issue and play deliberately dumb.
Once again, all you have to do is change "woke" to "right-wing" and you're describing exactly what you always do.
 
Musk has done a valuable public service in exposing the ridiculous ways USAID is spending taxpayer money. It’s obvious that oversight and accountability is needed. Putting the agency under direction of the State Department and Secretary Rubio was a good first step. It’s not a new idea either.

During the Clinton administration in 1995, Secretary of State Warren Christopher proposed eliminating USAID and two other independent foreign policy agencies and bringing them under control of the State Department. It didn’t happen then but the time has come for it to happen now.

And yes, Snopes has zero credibility.
 
Musk has done a valuable public service in exposing the ridiculous ways USAID is spending taxpayer money. It’s obvious that oversight and accountability is needed. Putting the agency under direction of the State Department and Secretary Rubio was a good first step. It’s not a new idea either.

During the Clinton administration in 1995, Secretary of State Warren Christopher proposed eliminating USAID and two other independent foreign policy agencies and bringing them under control of the State Department. It didn’t happen then but the time has come for it to happen now.

And yes, Snopes has zero credibility.
Clinton was vulnerable to "suggestions" by the intelligence community. :rolleyes:
 
This would carry a lot more weight if you or any of the other wingnuts here had ever produced any evidence that they get things wrong.
The Good, the Bad, the Ugly

There are a couple of things of note here. They have, as of late, scored rather good with sourcing. Unlike early plagiarism messes. They also source ALL their info from left-leaning sources, NPR and NYT are named, so they will always skew left.
 
Yeah yeah yeah and when you check their sources, they're other woke media, or they skirt around the truth or they only address half the issue and play deliberately dumb. Nope, Snopes is a waste of space and has an extreme left bias.

On other words, you believe everything that’s already in you head and accept it as fact if it came from a source sympathetic to your political ideology. ✅
 
EXACTLY.

I get so tired of this crap. Anytime someone's dystopian fantasies are exposed as "False" these people don't have the mental or emotional maturity to accept that "Well, maybe I was wrong." Oh no. They attack the debunkers, claiming it's "Biased."

Truth isn't biased. Facts aren't biased. Facts are facts- whether you are emotionally mature enough to accept them or not reflects only on you.
Says the poster with the Democrat Blinkers superglued over their eyes. LOL
 
^^^
Spokesman for the Brotherhood of Bandits we refer to as Democrats.
However you need to cope with my support is fine.

Your objection is based on your ignorance, your hatred and your bigotry.
 
Not really relevant to the USAID is it? :)
Your question was about the number of people signing checks, and to that, the answer was relevant. Putin bought off Trump for his first term, Musk bought him for his second.

He's totally transactional; if anyone pays him enough he will deliver to them no matter how treasonous or corrupt.
 
However you need to cope with my support is fine.

Your objection is based on your ignorance, your hatred and your bigotry.
Conspiracy loons hate facts, and most MAGAs are conspiracy loons.

1174 and MR often use the psychological sleight of hand we see above, where one's own fears, desires, or insecurities are cloaked in the form of another, allowing themselves to escape the "mirror" of introspection. They see in others what they fear to admit in themselves, using the Forum as a canvas upon which they paint their own shortcomings, each projection a desperate act to avoid the mirror of self-reflection. Yet in their attempts to demean, they only expose the hollow echo of themselves, like children throwing stones at reflections they don't want to face.
 
Back
Top