Nobody is gay or transgender because they were groomed for it or seduced into it.

Bobo doesn't want what happened in Siberia to happen here....."hell you can't even audition for the orchestra unless you are trans!"
 
So, you're saying it's an t a "born" thing...at least for some?
It's a born thing that makes boys chase boys. It's also a born thing that determines whether the chaser will succeed in any given case. That only works differently in environments where the opposite sex is not available -- like single-sex boarding schools, prisons, monasteries, ships at sea, work camps. There you will find a lot of homosexual behavior among people who would not otherwise incline to it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the clarification.
I don't have an opinion on this, but I do believe on any topic you should never say never...in this case that grooming or seduction never occurs.
Too many people with too many variables.
 
Thanks for the clarification.
I don't have an opinion on this, but I do believe on any topic you should never say never...in this case that grooming or seduction never occurs.
Anyone successfully seduced was probably at least bi to begin with.

What does not happen, and what a lot of RWs appear to fear is happening, is gay schoolteachers striving to create the next generation of fags through indoctrination.
 
Same thing that happens to develop there rest of a persons personality/sense of self/sexual nature.....our environment, the people who raise us and how.

You do understand that has an effect on development right??
So question. Do you strictly believe in nurture over nature and that genetics plays no role in sexual orientation or sexual identity?
 
What does not happen, and what a lot of RWs appear to fear is happening, is gay schoolteachers striving to create the next generation of fags through indoctrination.
This is what matters more than anything else, on this subject.
 
You do all understand that, right? It is only the nature some people are born with. It does not result from being raised by a weak-willed father and a domineering mother or anything Freudian like that. It does not result from being exposed to books with LGBT characters. There is no recruiting going on here.
You don't believe there's a cultural element to human sexual behaviour?

In the days of the Roman Empire they had no concept of heterosexual or homosexual there was just active or passive. It wasn't shameful for a man to have sex with another man but it was shameful to be the passive partner to somebody of a lower social status. If sexual behaviour is innate how come it's not the same now?

The American military training troops in Afghanistan faced a mutiny because they banned their recruits from a local practice known as Bacha Bazi which basically involves feminizing underage boys and sodomizing them. Of course the young boys are coerced but the question is why do so many Afghan men want to bang underage boys in the first place?

Or in the animal kingdom why are Bonobos bisexual when their closest relatives, Chimpanzees, are not? Is it because they had the good fortune of more available resources and so spent less time fighting for survival and more time on social interaction?
 
Just a bellicose few, methinks.
Rightguide, of course, is the "erryone I don't like is a groomer! A GROOMER DAMMIT!" guy.
Whatever userid the cowardly Korean welfare mooch is hiding behind is also one of those types as well.
AJ, Lit's "reformed homosexual", will also shout "groomer! GROOMER!" if he thinks he can make a political point.

Most of this shit is performative, in any event.
 
You don't believe there's a cultural element to human sexual behaviour?

In the days of the Roman Empire they had no concept of heterosexual or homosexual there was just active or passive. It wasn't shameful for a man to have sex with another man but it was shameful to be the passive partner to somebody of a lower social status. If sexual behaviour is innate how come it's not the same now?

The American military training troops in Afghanistan faced a mutiny because they banned their recruits from a local practice known as Bacha Bazi which basically involves feminizing underage boys and sodomizing them. Of course the young boys are coerced but the question is why do so many Afghan men want to bang underage boys in the first place?

Or in the animal kingdom why are Bonobos bisexual when their closest relatives, Chimpanzees, are not? Is it because they had the good fortune of more available resources and so spent less time fighting for survival and more time on social interaction?
as Bacha Bazi which basically involves feminizing underage boys and sodomizing them. Of course the young boys are coerced
Feminized boys cannot get pregnant.
 
There's also widespread misconception that there is some connection between pedophilia and homosexuality. You might get a different impression from Law & Order: SVU, but, in actual fact, the vast majority of molestation victims are girls.

See also Boys Beware (1961).
 
There's also widespread misconception that there is some connection between pedophilia and homosexuality. You might get a different impression from Law & Order: SVU, but, in actual fact, the vast majority of molestation victims are girls.

See also Boys Beware (1961).

It's not Law & Order that thinks there's a connection between sexual deviants and the sexual deviants in the street not only taking pride in their deviancy but proudly chanting "We're here!! We're Queer!! And we're coming for your kids!!" that makes me think there is a connection.


Also the mass triggering in their community banning porn in K-5th classrooms .....why ya'll so mad? :(
 
It's not Law & Order that thinks there's a connection between sexual deviants and the sexual deviants in the street not only taking pride in their deviancy but proudly chanting "We're here!! We're Queer!! And we're coming for your kids!!" that makes me think there is a connection.
In the extremely unlikely event that you've ever really heard anyone say that (as opposed to "We're here, we're queer, get used to it!", which is quite common at pride marches), here's what you're missing: they were making fun of people like you who think they're pedophiles, and/or that they "recruit" children.
 
In the extremely unlikely event that you've ever really heard anyone say that

If you bury your head up Joy Reid and Rachel Meadows ass's I'm sure you think that never happened.

Dozens of people at several events posted video of it. Some by the people chanting it, they were THAT proud.

Among some other pretty fucked up shit like involving kids in playing with furries..... fucking gross, all those parents should be put in prison.

But just ignore it, doesn't suit your narrative that things like that never happen. LGBTQ+ = perfection on earth....only het-cis-white males can be horrible!!
 
Dozens of people at several events posted video of it. Some by the people chanting it, they were THAT proud.
Read the rest of my last post, the part you did not quote.
But just ignore it, doesn't suit your narrative that things like that never happen. LGBTQ+ = perfection on earth....only het-cis-white males can be horrible!!
No one ever said that, but at least this time you didn't put quotation marks around something no one said. That's...a start.
 
Then you know what you said in response was horseshit, since I provided an explanation as to what that chant really meant if in fact you ever heard it.

Of course, given your track record, it's entirely possible that you really heard it, while at the very same time it was not what was actually being said at all. That is totally plausible with you.
 
It's not Law & Order that thinks there's a connection between sexual deviants and the sexual deviants in the street not only taking pride in their deviancy but proudly chanting "We're here!! We're Queer!! And we're coming for your kids!!" that makes me think there is a connection.
Nobody ever chants that.
 
Back
Top