ChloeTzang
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2015
- Posts
- 16,958
I think Hegseth is out of his depth. However, in saying that, I would give him a chance.
I heard, secondhand through another military veteran, (a former navy officer, who heads up an anti-piracy think tank) that when he briefed Austin two years ago, he was prepared, knew his shit and had obviously done his homework.
He had the white paper underlined and highlighted. He’d done his homework. You might not have agreed with his policies, but he was extremely well prepared. Asked good questions and was very pointed with his time and excellent questions.
My friend is pretty conservative, but was quite impressed.
Like I said, I would give Hegseth a chance and see where it goes.
Yep. He graduated from Princeton and has a Masters from Harvard. He worked as a capital markets analyst at Bear Stearns and that's no job for dummies. He was Major in the Army and that takes some doing too. My husband was a Captain by time he got out and it's a tough job. Making Major is nothing to be sneezed at. You need to know your stuff. Ten years with Fox News has kept him in the spotlight and in front of people.
He's qualified, smart and conscientious.
As for drinking, which some here have snarked about, if you haven't been in the military, basically, STFU.
I don't think the media or the DC intelligentsia realize that to a lot of veterans, the fact that Pete Hegseth developed a drinking problem after coming home from the GWOT, and then BEAT that drinking problem, is a huge PLUS and is in no way a negative. Most veterans know too friends who came home from the wars with demons they could not defeat, who descended into substance abuse and could not get out--and then some of whom even took their own lives. My husband volunteers with an organization that helps veterans deal with this stuff.
Pete Hegseth understands what our military adventurism means in a fundamental way that the Liz Warrens and Mitch McConnell's (and most of you, too) of the world will NEVER get. Pete has been there, but beat it. Neither does he have any ties to the MIC, unlike Austin and pretty much all his predecessors. THAT is an even better thing. He's focused on the mission and the people, NOT where is next grift is coming from. He gave up a few million bucks a year to take this job - and you can't say that for Austin or many of his predecessors either.
Something else to consider is that he’s a blend of the 2 big archetypes you see in the military, which are in a lot of ways polar opposites . He’s both a rough around the edges grunt AND a polished “professional” with an impressive academic pedigree. He’s the guy that would be equally at home hanging out in the barracks with the boys on the weekend or discussing the inner workings of strategy and policy in the Pentagon.
He's the right man for the job.
Last edited: