It has never been decide by the courts, dipshit. The arguments continue to be specilative
Won't stop the fat,flatulent Floridian from trying.
Potussies!!
They would have just a touch more dignity without the cheerleader's pom-poms.
Lie.
In Treeview's link above your post, it shows the arguments HAVE been litigated at the Supreme Court.
That was only in regards to diplomats. I was specifically discussing the Stephen Miller argument which suggests that the 14th amendment is conditional.
Did you read the case you posted? There is a VERY important caveat in there. I can assure you, it applies and it’s what President Trump is shutting down. NOT what that case addresses.
That the parents have to be in the US legally? The case did not take a position on that, since it was a moot point in the case in question. It is the subject of debate among legal scholars, but if you're looking for legal precedent for denying birthright citizenship on that basis, it ain't here.
No, that they have a have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States. I lived in a border town for 5 years and visit that same town a couple of times a year for the last 33 years. This has been a hot topic since Slick Willie roamed the closets of the Oval Office.
And if the Trump Admin tries to use that theory in court, they'll lose - even before the SCOTUS in its present formation.
If his parents were already naturalized citizens when he was born/issued the birth certificate, that's not an issue.
That isn't a 14th amendment argument.
