COVID-19 RESOURCES
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Trump supporters became more likely to express dehumanizing views of Black people After 2016

Rotadom said:
There is plenty of dead Palestinian baby pics on the web. I'm not going to contribute to your jerk fodder.

This is one of the few times in history when we can say, "both sides are commiting atrocities." and be correct.
Click to expand...
U said jews did it, show me

The same jews that blew up the hospital n killed 500?
 
RobDownSouth said:
The pictures of all the dead Palestinian children in Gaza would appear to back up their claim.
but...but..."errybody knows that Hamas lies!" right?
Click to expand...
Yes, lots of pics and yes, lots of pics and videos of those so-called dead. Getting up when the cameras are turned off I posted them here
 
Hamas came in and killed men women and children They raped they tortured they beheaded they baked Kids they took hostages. So I don't want to hear anything about. So-called dead kids on their part assuming its even true.
 
cermin said:
Yes, lots of pics and yes, lots of pics and videos of those so-called dead. Getting up when the cameras are turned off I posted them here
Click to expand...
Posted pictures? Sure you did. "so-called dead"....:rolleyes:
"errybody knows Hamas uses 'crisis actors'"
 
snailspace said:
What did Hamas expect after they attacked and killed and worse?
Click to expand...
So you're not cool with Israeli children being killed but you're cool with Palestinian children being killed.

Thanks BB
 
ll74 said:
How do you read the unreadable?
Click to expand...
So, you’ve never attempted to read sentence by sentence a narrative so convoluted that after a while it just becomes unintelligible and you quit reading.
 
icanhelp1 said:
So, you’ve never attempted to read sentence by sentence a narrative so convoluted that after a while it just becomes unintelligible and you quit reading.
Click to expand...
So then you didn't read it, in full. You read part of it and decided it didn't make sense to you.

Got it.
 
Last edited:
ll74 said:
So then you didn't read it, i full. You read part of it and decided it didn't make sense to you.

Got it.
Click to expand...
The article was not only a Trump bashing fest but an attempt at bashing Trump supporters. We lived through all that crap. Comments taken out of context are once again being analyzed to the detriment of Trump supporters. The whole article is dripping with racism against whites. “Became more likely”?became more likely to what, believe that pro trumpers believe black people are unevolved. I voted for Trump in 2016 and that thought never crossed my mind. Chobham was spot on with his comment. The whole article is a load of crap. The whole article was analogous of a steering committee attempting to massage a narrative to support a predetermined conclusion.

“But a deeper dive into the data showed a clear polarizing effect based on the participants’ attitudes towards Trump. Those who viewed Trump favorably before the election were found to rate Black people as less evolved post-election. In contrast, those with unfavorable views towards Trump rated Black people as more evolved post-election.”

The whole article was offensive. If you’re pro Trump you’re a racist and if you’re anti Trump you’re not.
 
icanhelp1 said:
The article was not only a Trump bashing fest but an attempt at bashing Trump supporters. We lived through all that crap. Comments taken out of context are once again being analyzed to the detriment of Trump supporters. The whole article is dripping with racism against whites. “Became more likely”?became more likely to what, believe that pro trumpers believe black people are unevolved. I voted for Trump in 2016 and that thought never crossed my mind. Chobham was spot on with his comment. The whole article is a load of crap. The whole article was analogous of a steering committee attempting to massage a narrative to support a predetermined conclusion.

“But a deeper dive into the data showed a clear polarizing effect based on the participants’ attitudes towards Trump. Those who viewed Trump favorably before the election were found to rate Black people as less evolved post-election. In contrast, those with unfavorable views towards Trump rated Black people as more evolved post-election.”

The whole article was offensive. If you’re pro Trump you’re a racist and if you’re anti Trump you’re not.
Click to expand...
That was your conclusion from the study. Interesting. I don't see racism mentioned there.

What they're doing is called crosstabs. It's used all the time in polling.
 
John_von_Neumann said:
Icanthelpmyself apparently never heard of correlation. Science literacy in this country is shameful.
Click to expand...

What is scientific polling?​


Scientific polling is the activity of using statistical information to select respondents and obtain timely results through an unbiased questioning mechanism. The researchers have to focus on using a correct and concise line of questioning by taking care that the respondents are not pushed to answering in a certain manner because of leading terms. The poll results that are projected from an unscientific poll have a large margin of error and may mislead follow up decisions.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

butters
New York court convicts Florida man far-right influencer Ricky Vaughn, for conspiring to deprive Clinton supporters of their right to vote
Replies
6
Views
219
Lazaran
L
L
In the world of sexual fetishes, crossing the political aisle is a kink
2
Replies
44
Views
1K
PaxNurgle
P
DeluxAuto
GOP Candidates Scrub Their Sites of Abortion and Trump "The Big Scrub" is On
Replies
3
Views
266
jaF0
jaF0
P
  • Poll
The 2021 Pew Political Typology report
2 3
Replies
51
Views
2K
pecksniff
P
butters
voter intimidation alive and kicking in virginia
Replies
5
Views
259
Fuzzy1975
F
Back
Top