Tony Bobulinski Cooks Joe Biden

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
56,451

Tony Bobulinski: CCP-Linked Entity Tried to Infiltrate Obama Admin​

593
Tony Bobulinski to testify
MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
WENDELL HUSEBØ14 Feb 2024

CEFC China Energy Co, a CCP-linked entity, tried to infiltrate the Obama administration in which it “successfully” compromised then Vice President Joe Biden, Tony Bobulinski told the House impeachment inquiry on Tuesday. Bobulinski’s testimony is significant because he is one of the most knowledgeable and forthcoming former associates of the Bidens.

He is the whistleblower who initially confirmed the infamous message about a stake of “10 held by H for the big guy,” as referring to Joe Biden, who met Bobulinski in the lobby of the Beverly Hilton Hotel in May 2017 to discuss business with CEFC.

In his opening statement to investigators, the former Biden associate, a serious businessman even before his proposed business with the Bidens, said CEFC worked to “infiltrate” the Obama White House beginning in 2015 and in the process, compromised the vice president. He said Joe Biden remained compromised even after he left office in 2016:

The Chinese Communist Party through its surrogate, China Energy Company Limited, or “CEFC” … successfully sought to infiltrate and compromise Joe Biden and the Obama-Biden White House. This process started in the Fourth Quarter of 2015 and continued through when Joe Biden left office in January 2017 to March of 2018 when CEFC Chairman Ye was detained for corruption in China, never to be seen again.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...inked-entity-tried-to-infiltrate-obama-admin/

He said this under oath...again.
 

Tony Bobulinski: CCP-Linked Entity Tried to Infiltrate Obama Admin​

593
Tony Bobulinski to testify
MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images
WENDELL HUSEBØ14 Feb 2024

CEFC China Energy Co, a CCP-linked entity, tried to infiltrate the Obama administration in which it “successfully” compromised then Vice President Joe Biden, Tony Bobulinski told the House impeachment inquiry on Tuesday. Bobulinski’s testimony is significant because he is one of the most knowledgeable and forthcoming former associates of the Bidens.

He is the whistleblower who initially confirmed the infamous message about a stake of “10 held by H for the big guy,” as referring to Joe Biden, who met Bobulinski in the lobby of the Beverly Hilton Hotel in May 2017 to discuss business with CEFC.

In his opening statement to investigators, the former Biden associate, a serious businessman even before his proposed business with the Bidens, said CEFC worked to “infiltrate” the Obama White House beginning in 2015 and in the process, compromised the vice president. He said Joe Biden remained compromised even after he left office in 2016:


https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...inked-entity-tried-to-infiltrate-obama-admin/

He said this under oath...again.
stormtrooper-shooting.gif
 
Bobulinski? Hmmm....whar have I heard that name? Oh...right. He was the guy who famously tried to sell this story to the Wall Street Journal right before the 2020 election. WSJ was eager to buy it....asked for supporting documents....

*crickets*

WSJ passed.

Now Bobulinski is peddling the same story "under oath", again with no supporting documentation for his claims.

Former Biden family business associate recycles unproven allegations to House panels

 
Bobulinski? Hmmm....whar have I heard that name? Oh...right. He was the guy who famously tried to sell this story to the Wall Street Journal right before the 2020 election. WSJ was eager to buy it....asked for supporting documents....

*crickets*

WSJ passed.

Now Bobulinski is peddling the same story "under oath", again with no supporting documentation for his claims.

Former Biden family business associate recycles unproven allegations to House panels

Keep whistling through the graveyard but make sure you don't fall into an open hole mid tune.
 
So why didn't you just add it to one of your other 50 threads on the topic?
 
Isn't Hillary's entire job to make sure people like this go on vacation and never come back?
 
This testimony alleges, under oath, that Joe Biden has been compromised by the Chinese Communist Party. In other words, he is a paid enemy agent.
 
This testimony alleges, under oath, that Joe Biden has been compromised by the Chinese Communist Party. In other words, he is a paid enemy agent.
Is that the same Chinese Communist Party that infiltrated Mar y Stinko while there were piles of boxes of nuclear secrets in the room with pool noodles, on the ballroom stage (hidden behind curtains) and in the bathroom of a spare guest room?


https://www.scmp.com/news/china/art...ve-tycoon-and-member-trumps-mar-lago-also-spy
 
Because I knew it would make you wet the bed.
All it does is make you sound like a whiner more than you already are.

One thread should be sufficient, but you feel the need to make more to feel heard.
 
Because I knew it would make you wet the bed.
You really love using this term.

Something you wanna tell us? Was this a past childhood shame with you that you haven't mentally gotten over and that you're trying to work through with projection on others?

New urination fetish? Aren't you a diehard poop and scat man? :ROFLMAO:
 
All it does is make you sound like a whiner more than you already are.

One thread should be sufficient, but you feel the need to make more to feel heard.
Grab a pair of pliers and relieve your wedgie, you'll feel better.
 
Grab a pair of pliers and relieve your wedgie, you'll feel better.
I enjoy that you believe you making a ton of threads on the same subject says anything about me.

Threads are a start of a discussion. If the discussion has already been started, there is no need to start a new one. You don't want a discussion.... You just want to whine and spark some sort of reaction.
 
This testimony alleges, under oath, that Joe Biden has been compromised by the Chinese Communist Party. In other words, he is a paid enemy agent.
And at least seven other people have given testimony, also under oath, of the opposite. Obviously both claims cannot be true. So we have competing claims. Until Mr. Bobulinski provides solid evidence to support his claims, it is his word against several other people's word. While it certainly makes for sensational headlines, it is hardly something one could hang something like an impeachment of a president on. Once again, Comer comes up empty.
 
And at least seven other people have given testimony, also under oath, of the opposite. Obviously both claims cannot be true. So we have competing claims. Until Mr. Bobulinski provides solid evidence to support his claims, it is his word against several other people's word. While it certainly makes for sensational headlines, it is hardly something one could hang something like an impeachment of a president on. Once again, Comer comes up empty.
Ding ding, we have a winner.
 
I enjoy that you believe you making a ton of threads on the same subject says anything about me.

Threads are a start of a discussion. If the discussion has already been started, there is no need to start a new one. You don't want a discussion.... You just want to whine and spark some sort of reaction.
There is relief in sight. All you have to do is to ignore them and it won't bother you so much.
 
And at least seven other people have given testimony, also under oath, of the opposite. Obviously both claims cannot be true. So we have competing claims. Until Mr. Bobulinski provides solid evidence to support his claims, it is his word against several other people's word. While it certainly makes for sensational headlines, it is hardly something one could hang something like an impeachment of a president on. Once again, Comer comes up empty.
Were the others all business partners of the President? Bobulinski has brought documentation as well.
 
There is relief in sight. All you have to do is to ignore them and it won't bother you so much.
You whining doesn't bother me. You clogging up the forum with useless whiny shit does.
 
Last edited:
Were the others all business partners of the President?
Bobulinski was not a business partner of Joe Biden. He at one time briefly worked with Sinohawk as did Hunter Biden. That is the extent of his connections to Joe Biden.

And yes, the others were also partners of Hunter Biden or worked with companies that worked with companies that Hunter Biden worked for.
Bobulinski has brought documentation as well.
Yes, and his documentation does not show what he claims it does. It certainly doesn't show any participation by Joe Biden in any of Hunter Biden's business dealings, or any renumeration from Chinese companies or the Chinese government to Joe Biden. Bobulinski has yet to show anything that shows Joe Biden's participation in, or benefiting from, Hunter Biden's businesses.
 
Bobulinski was not a business partner of Joe Biden. He at one time briefly worked with Sinohawk as did Hunter Biden. That is the extent of his connections to Joe Biden.

And yes, the others were also partners of Hunter Biden or worked with companies that worked with companies that Hunter Biden worked for.

Yes, and his documentation does not show what he claims it does. It certainly doesn't show any participation by Joe Biden in any of Hunter Biden's business dealings, or any renumeration from Chinese companies or the Chinese government to Joe Biden. Bobulinski has yet to show anything that shows Joe Biden's participation in, or benefiting from, Hunter Biden's businesses.

And yet because of that "documentation" we're now being informed of yet another bank account actually linked to Joe. An account in which his grandchildren as well as other family members deposited large sums of money to dear old grandpa's account.

Strange. Usually it's the other way around with grandad giving money to the grandkids instead of vice versa as in this case. It's almost like they're paying "the big guy" his 10 percent or something...
 
Back
Top