There's a Little Black Spot on the Sun Today [remix]

[dkovic77]

Trump really does live rent free in your head.


Boogeymen should be made of sterner stuff methinks...

Clear and present dangers really aren’t boogeymen.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

Poor AJ always the "nail" getting "driven"

 

[phrodeau]

In reality, our GlowBall Warning climate may be cooling, usher in the 70s Ice Age Alarmism...

🌨🌨

Where’s the cooling, dumbass?

Meanwhile, we found that simply substituting an alternative solar forcing dataset to that considered by AR6’s climate model hindcasts can substantially increase the amount of the 1850–2018 warming that can be explained in terms of natural forcing from 21% to 70% of the long-term warming implied by the “rural and urban” series and 87% of the “rural-only” temperature series.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The world had its hottest month EVER last month so the Housesquaw springs into action, dutifully regurgitating his hackneyed "Glow Ball Warming" dismissal and "but,,,but,,,ICE AGE" drivel.

The question remains folks: who ya gonna believe? AJ's carefully curated anecdata or your own lyin' eyes?

 

[DeluxAuto]

The world had its hottest month EVER last month

If we have the coldest year ever next year, AJ and his elk of science deniers will say, "See!? It balanced out!"

 

[Chobham]

Take 54 min. out of your life and inform yourself.

Climate Change Isn't What You're Told.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Take 54 min. out of your life and inform yourself.

Climate Change Isn't What You're Told.

He’s wrong.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...-to-get-climate-science-badly-wrong/?amp=true

 

[ll74]

He’s wrong.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...-to-get-climate-science-badly-wrong/?amp=true

The majority of opposition to climate change is based on religion. God has a plan...etc.....etc.

 

[Chobham]

He’s wrong.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...-to-get-climate-science-badly-wrong/?amp=true

*chuckle* So what you're saying is that you're still basically ignorant.

 

[Chobham]

The majority of opposition to climate change is based on religion. God has a plan...etc.....etc.

And you didn't watch the podcast either. Just spouting an opinion based on your own prejudice, not facts.

 

[ll74]

And you didn't watch the podcast either. Just spouting an opinion based on your own prejudice, not facts.

So you're saying that your opinion is fact and my opinion is opinion

Neat.

 

[Chobham]

I merely posted food for thought, the presenter states some facts.

 

[ll74]

I merely posted food for thought, the presenter states some facts.

No, you wanted your "food for thought" to be factual precedence for us to acknowledge.

 

[Chobham]

No, you wanted your "food for thought" to be factual precedence for us to acknowledge.

Fuck you. You can't read minds and seem to be quite content in your ignorance.

 

[ll74]

Fuck you. You can't read minds and seem to be quite content in your ignorance.

I just read your words

And you didn't watch the podcast either. Just spouting an opinion based on your own prejudice, not facts.

But you keep thinking you're above your own publicly admitted bullshit

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Fuck you. You can't read minds and seem to be quite content in your ignorance.

Don't be mad, Ish. You tried, but your mouth can't win 'em all.

It's a nice summery Sunday night. Go outside with your guns and shoot a few squirrels, vent some of that mental stress away while in nestled the bosom of nature.

 

[Chobham]

In your opinion, which are like belly buttons............everyone has one.

If you had bothered to watch the podcast, which being the ignorant political slut you are, you didn't, you'd find that;

The presenter agrees with all of the FACTS put forth in the IPCC reports. He even gives some additional support to those facts.

He then goes on to dissemble how the politicians and media have bastardized those facts.

So what do you want to be when you finally grow up? A curious mind in search of the truth, or some mindless drone blindly following the BS your fed by politicians and the media?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

In your opinion, which are like belly buttons............everyone has one.

If you had bothered to watch the podcast, which being the ignorant political slut you are, you didn't, you'd find that;

The presenter agrees with all of the FACTS put forth in the IPCC reports. He even gives some additional support to those facts.

He then goes on to dissemble how the politicians and media have bastardized those facts.

So what do you want to be when you finally grow up? A curious mind in search of the truth, or some mindless drone blindly following the BS your fed by politicians and the media?

Your podcast is wrong. That’s been proven.
The great thing about facts is that they’re true whether you choose to believe them or not.

 

[ll74]

In your opinion, which are like belly buttons............everyone has one.

If you had bothered to watch the podcast, which being the ignorant political slut you are, you didn't, you'd find that;

The presenter agrees with all of the FACTS put forth in the IPCC reports. He even gives some additional support to those facts.

He then goes on to dissemble how the politicians and media have bastardized those facts.

So what do you want to be when you finally grow up? A curious mind in search of the truth, or some mindless drone blindly following the BS your fed by politicians and the media?

Sounds like your first post with the source could've included more.

What is it that you're wanting me to admit? All I've ever seen from you (and AJ,) on the topic is that it's all a natural cycle that we can't change. Politicians play politics....it's in the fucking word.

 

[Chobham]

Watch the podcast and get back with some cogent responses would be a start.

 

[Lazaran]

Watch the podcast and get back with some cogent responses would be a start.

•
The most cogent response possible was provided by Gary Yohe’s direct rebuttal to Steven Koonin’s book " Unsettled" in Scientific American.

The link was already provided by another poster, but it appears you are still struggling to find it.

So here you go……again:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/...-to-get-climate-science-badly-wrong/?amp=true

Hope that ^ helps



My favorite quote from the article, and, likely, the most salient point:

“Koonin’s intervention into the debate about what to do about climate risks seems to be designed to subvert this progress in all respects by making distracting, irrelevant, misguided, misleading and unqualified statements about supposed uncertainties that he thinks scientists have buried under the rug.”



Ironically, that ^ legitimate information has been available almost as long as Steven Koonin’s work of misinformation / disinformation.



If you had seriously wanted to provide “food for thought”, you should have done your research, and included Gary Yohe’s rebuttal.



I found Gary Yohe’s rebuttal to be a comprehensive and compelling dismantling of Steven Koonin’s “distracting, irrelevant, misguided, misleading and unqualified statements about supposed uncertainties that he thinks scientists have buried under the rug.”

 

[Chobham]

•
The most cogent response possible was provided by Gary Yohe’s direct rebuttal to Steven Koonin’s book " Unsettled" in Scientific American.

The link was already provided by another poster, but it appears you are still struggling to find it.

So here you go……again:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/...-to-get-climate-science-badly-wrong/?amp=true

Hope that ^ helps



My favorite quote from the article, and, likely, the most salient point:

“Koonin’s intervention into the debate about what to do about climate risks seems to be designed to subvert this progress in all respects by making distracting, irrelevant, misguided, misleading and unqualified statements about supposed uncertainties that he thinks scientists have buried under the rug.”



Ironically, that ^ legitimate information has been available almost as long as Steven Koonin’s work of misinformation / disinformation.



If you had seriously wanted to provide “food for thought”, you should have done your research, and included Gary Yohe’s rebuttal.



I found Gary Yohe’s rebuttal to be a comprehensive and compelling dismantling of Steven Koonin’s “distracting, irrelevant, misguided, misleading and unqualified statements about supposed uncertainties that he thinks scientists have buried under the rug.”

A political editorial is NOT a cogent response.

 

[phrodeau]

A political editorial is NOT a cogent response.

Coonin’s book is an opinion piece.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

A political editorial is NOT a cogent response.

Coonin’s book is an opinion piece.

 

[Lazaran]

A political editorial is NOT a cogent response.

•
Gary Yohe is the most qualified person to respond to / rebut yours and Steven Koonin’s bullshit narrative.

That ^ is probably why SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN published his rebuttal.



And Gary Yohe’s response:/ rebuttal was more evidence/ fact based than Steven Koonin’s “distracting, irrelevant, misguided, misleading and unqualified statements about supposed uncertainties that he thinks scientists have buried under the rug.”



You were exposed for the biased, intellectually lazy and dishonest POS that you are, by claiming to just be offering “food for thought”, but neglecting to research the subject and share a conflicting / competing analysis from a more qualified source.



Just. Take. The. L.



Chobby