When you say support false narratives, do you mean:
Your Deep State placebo is such a convenient escape hatch pill to pop when you have no proof of your contention.
There is sworn testimony to those facts. Remember Durham interviewed Brennan and a number of other officials. Understand as well that Durham would be committing a federal felony in filing a false report. I understand your grief in discovering your entire belief system over the last 6 years has been laid waste by the winds of fate and the sword of truth, but here take my hand and let me help you up and off the field.
Bottom line, you were wrong, we were right. You were lied to and you repeated those lies even when confronted with the truth. You are small in stature and weak in mind.
Not only is he not convicted he wasn't even charged as president, by the FBI or Mueller and his 14 or so Trump-hating Hillary Supporters. Recall the words of Barr:
No, what I’m calling bullshit on is the narrative/insinuation that the following are in Brennan’s notes: “vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services."
Well, first of all, Barr was hired because of his well timed submission of his white paper arguing why a sitting president couldn’t be charged with a crime. And that’s why Mueller didn’t call it out and left it up to the AG.
What page in the Durham report is that quote mentioned?
Barr did not make that determination. That determination was made by the Office Of Legal Counsel in 1973 and later reaffirmed it in the year 2000.
Barr was never in Trump's pocket but that didn't require him to agree with what we now know was a political lynching by the Clinton Campaign and the Deep State.
Beats me. That was in response to your post #62, last paragraph. Seemed like it was from an official report of what specifically was in Brennens notes.
I misremembered. It was a brief he submitted criticizing the mueller investigation and saying the prez couldn’t be charged with obstruction because “obstruction of justice is limited to things like witness tampering and destroying evidence and that the president has “complete authority to start or stop a law enforcement proceeding.”
Hoo boy, you don’t want to believe it, but Barr certainly was in there. That’s the only explanation for his mueller summary letter (and other things-see above links). He was trumps wingman up until trump’s crazy talk about a stolen election and only then did he come to his senses. He even wrote a book and went on a redemption tour to try and salvage his legacy.
Hahaha. Yeah, that's not the bottom line.
Mueller had nothing. Barr knew there was no predicate for the Crossfire Hurricane investigation on which the Mueller Investigation was based. Mueller had no predicate either, nor did he have anything on Trump either. The whole thing was a sham, a conspiracy to defraud the United States and rig the presidential election.
The Durham Report reveals the collapse of DOJ, FBI, the FISA Court system and how they've been remade into militant arms of the Democrat Party. We've seen the exclusive right of the American people to select their President snatched away by the Administrative State of the unelected bureaucrats. Obama started this and Joe Biden, working on behalf of the CCP is continuing the job. Democrats destroy everything they touch.Hahaha. Yeah, that's not the bottom line.
You were the one saying it was the crime of the century. Durham had two failed trials and one guilty plea to changing an email.
He's even more impotent than you!
Interesting, but not surprising, take on an investigation the IGs report found valid, though Durham disagreed with that and pretty much only that. It was clear Russians interfered. As for collusion, mueller said he couldn’t prove it, though nor could he rule it out-he would not have said that if something wasn’t murky. As for obstruction, mueller laid out eight, I think, instances and led readers to the watering hole. But nothing was done because 1) Barrs DOJ stance on indicting sitting presidents for obstruction, and 2) because Barr was trumps man who was hired because his take on obstruction would protect the president.
Read the Durham Report and stop being a dummy. The whole Trump collusion narrative was a hoax and the Mueller Investigation, a conspiracy to subvert the Trump presidency, was based on it and other hoaxes, like he obstructed Justice.
Stop being such a rabid zealot. You are actually blind to the truth, not righteously exposing it.
Bwahahaha.
There is a ton of conflation from the left and the right on the report (not to mention obfuscation) - typical for spinning the news.
This is also your take on the unfruitful investigations into Hillary as well, yes?
As opposed to those willing to believe Putin.
Here's what you don't know:
No, somehow, by dark Democrat magic perhaps, the Deep State perverted those multiple taxpayer pocket-draining investigations that would've put her in the darkest basement floor of Sing-Sing had it not interfered.
