No, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, Youtube, Google, etc. are not "left-wing media"

[pecksniff]

Not at all.

That's why they drive you nuts.

If Wikipedia is left-wing, then nothing that is not left-wing makes any sense.

 

[Cubantripod]

If Wikipedia is left-wing, then nothing that is not left-wing makes any sense.

That's what many on here are saying. Left-wing can be illogical an illiberal.

 

[Rightguide]

If Wikipedia is left-wing, then nothing that is not left-wing makes any sense.

Wiki only makes complete sense when the truth is either ignored or unknown. it's also a great source for the fortification of liberal "facts" that can't be fortified anywhere else.

 

[pecksniff]

Wiki only makes complete sense when the truth is either ignored or unknown. it's also a great source for the fortification of liberal "facts" that can't be fortified anywhere else.

Nothing on Wikipedia is unsourced. It's the most generally credible and reliable resource out there. Not necessarily the best, that would be RationalWiki, which is not hampered by Wikipedia's "neutrality" policy.

 

[Rightguide]

Nothing on Wikipedia is unsourced. It's the most generally credible and reliable resource out there. Not necessarily the best, that would be RationalWiki, which is not hampered by Wikipedia's "neutrality" policy.

And anyone can edit the data.

 

[pecksniff]

And anyone can edit the data.

Including RWs. Disagreements are threshed out on the talk page. Sometimes, if things get hot, the mods or sysadmins or whatever they call them will lock the page until they can sort things out. The result is a constant iterative process always tending in the general direction of The Truth Insofar As Anybody Knows It. And that's the best we can ask for.

If RWs are really so insane -- and I did not realize they had degenerated that far -- as to think Wikipedia and PolitiFact are leftist, then it is not surprising that they similarly classify CNN, etc.

But, lately, they've started calling Fox leftist. And the only reason for that appears to be, that Fox is no longer reliably pro-Trump.

 

[YDB95]

Stephen Colbert said it best: "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."

 

[Cubantripod]

If RWs are really so insane -- and I did not realize they had degenerated that far -- as to think Wikipedia and PolitiFact are leftist, then it is not surprising that they similarly classify CNN, etc.

CNN was probably the more credible of the cable news network and after Trump they just sacrificed 30 years of credibility and went hard left.

 

[YDB95]

CNN was probably the more credible of the cable news network and after Trump they just sacrificed 30 years of credibility and went hard left.

No, love them or hate them, CNN was already the object of outrage from the right (i.e. "Clinton News Network," "Communist News Network") long before Trump.

 

[CornusKousa]

Stephen Colbert said it best: "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."

LOL....nothing funnier than a bunch of totalitarian control freaks who absolutely under NO circumstance will ever mind their own fucking bidniz, pretend they are liberals.

 

[CornusKousa]

Nothing on Wikipedia is unsourced. It's the most generally credible and reliable resource out there. Not necessarily the best, that would be RationalWiki, which is not hampered by Wikipedia's "neutrality" policy.

Rationalwiki is just a leftist jerkoff site.

You might as well just be citing a RAW/Salon opinion piece.

 

[pecksniff]

Rationalwiki is just a leftist jerkoff site.

You might as well just be citing a RAW/Salon opinion piece.

Here's their page on Communism. Not too flattering.

 

[CornusKousa]

Here's their page on Communism. Not too flattering.

So what??

That's like calling Fox news fair and balanced because they denounced ethno-Nationalism.

 

[pecksniff]

So what??

That's like calling Fox news fair and balanced because they denounced ethno-Nationalism.

The socialism page ain't much more pro. In fact it is a highly nuanced discussion, beyond your comprehension as such usually are.

 

[CornusKousa]

The socialism page ain't much more pro. In fact it is a highly nuanced discussion, beyond your comprehension as such usually are.

Says the guy who didn't know what positive liberty is.

Lefty infighting is normal.

Doesn't make rational wiki NOT a leftist confirmation bias jackoff site.

"nuanced" lmfao....

 

[Rightguide]

Stephen Colbert said it best: "Reality has a well-known liberal bias."

Yes, a bias against the positions of the left.

 

[pecksniff]

Yes, a bias against the positions of the left.

Are you using the word "liberal" the way Cornus does, now?!

 

[CornusKousa]

Are you using the word "liberal" the way Cornus does, now?!

You mean as it's actually defined??

You and the other authoritarian leftist don't seem to understand the RW is waking up to the fact that you lot are NOT liberal, at all or really about anything.

liberalism =/= Democrat totalitarian authority.... no matter how much you authoritarians try to lie about it.

 

[pecksniff]

Says the guy who didn't know what positive liberty is.

Insofar as I understand it, I can't believe it's something you believe in.

Liberalism:

Liberalism argues that positive liberty is absolutely necessary for universal human freedom, particularly that of the poor. For instance, a family which struggles to earn enough to feed itself will obviously be unable to provide medical care or education for its members without state intervention. As such, the state should intervene in economic affairs on behalf of the least privileged. Liberals are also in favor of enforcing agrarian reform and land grants and likewise advocate for a strong centralized state (especially the Jacobins). Liberals want all people to be actually free, period, and when Liberals abolished slavery, either in Jacobin France or Radical Republican America, they denied compensation to slave owners, albeit any attempts to extend support and investment to newly freed slaves provoked such a backlash and reversal that they eventually stopped from fully committing to their program.

 

[pecksniff]

You mean as it's actually defined??

You and the other authoritarian leftist don't seem to understand the RW is waking up to the fact that you lot are NOT liberal, at all or really about anything.

liberalism =/= Democrat totalitarian authority.... no matter how much you authoritarians try to lie about it.

Actually, there are six lights.

 

[rae121452]

i remember when i was young (in another century) that we had underground newspapers and underground media because the mainstream media was so far right.

 

[pecksniff]

i remember when i was young (in another century) that we had underground newspapers and underground media because the mainstream media was so far right.

Best thing to come out of that was the UG comic books! Zap! Freak Brothers! Wonder Warthog! Young Lust! Robert Crumb! Class War Comix! Trashman!

 

[techiedude71]

In this new era of 24/7 news channels as “edutainment” it would seem to me they all report the same facts. It’s the opining of those facts as they fill the other 20 hours.

You guys seem to pay really close attention so perhaps there is bias on what stories they’ll actually report as news and I get that but big stories are the same across the board I think. Keep watching talking heads and eventually one will say something you disagree with.

 

[butters]

Wallace lays the blame for the likes of taylor-greene directly at mcconnell, mccarthy, and graham's doors, going further into one about the insurrection.
there are a lot of republicans, still, who are embarrassed by trump and all the damage he's done to their party.

This new stunt led MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace to blame the Republican Party leaders for creating people like Greene. Previously a Republican who served in the George W. Bush administration, Wallace also attacked both men for refusing to curb Trump's extremism.

"The reason we don't play that Lindsey Graham speech every day -- because I agree it was remarkable, as was Mitch McConnell (R-KY) calling for Trump to be criminally prosecuted — is because they have gone to all five sides of the hexagon of election fraud," said Wallace. "And Mitch McConnell and [Kevin] McCarthy (R-CA) and Graham are the reason there was an insurrection. Because if Donald Trump had been checked... in December, in early January, there might not have been an insurrection, you might not have had police officers mutilated with a flag pole.

https://www.rawstory.com/mcconnell-...testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=3#cxrecs_s

 

[CornusKousa]

Wallace lays the blame for the likes of taylor-greene directly at mcconnell, mccarthy, and graham's doors, going further into one about the insurrection.
there are a lot of republicans, still, who are embarrassed by trump and all the damage he's done to their party.


https://www.rawstory.com/mcconnell-...testVariant=cx_undefined&cx_artPos=3#cxrecs_s

Then those RINO's need to gtfo and go join the (D)'eez....they are in the wrong fucking party.