Europe: Death by suicide

CSbXrQ2UkAAq4zv.jpg
 
yet they they let them BACK in and bring MORE in

ISIS planning large-scale attack in UK, MI5 head warns

Andrew Parker, director-general of Britain's MI5 intelligence service, warned Wednesday that British jihadists are planning to carry out a major attack in the UK, saying that the treat was the most serious in his entire 32-year career. While delivering an annual defense and security lecture in London, he added that "More than 750 extremists from this country have travelled to Syria, and the growth in the threat shows no sign of abating."


and when I post this in the ENGLAND IS DYING THREADS.....the BRITS ATTACK ME:rolleyes:
 
Invasion: FIVE MILLION MUSLIMS march on Europe: “We cannot guarantee the public safety anymore”

Apparently the numbers that they’ve been selling to their unsuspecting populations are wrong by at least four million. The latest invasion reflects a truer number of five million, not one million — five million invaders. If that’s not war, what is?
 
yet they they let them BACK in and bring MORE in

ISIS planning large-scale attack in UK, MI5 head warns

Andrew Parker, director-general of Britain's MI5 intelligence service, warned Wednesday that British jihadists are planning to carry out a major attack in the UK, saying that the treat was the most serious in his entire 32-year career. While delivering an annual defense and security lecture in London, he added that "More than 750 extremists from this country have travelled to Syria, and the growth in the threat shows no sign of abating."


and when I post this in the ENGLAND IS DYING THREADS.....the BRITS ATTACK ME:rolleyes:

He said: “More than 750 extremists from this country have travelled to Syria, and the growth in the threat shows no sign of abating. “We are seeing plots against the UK directed by terrorists in Syria; enabled through contacts with terrorists in Syria; and inspired online by Isil’s sophisticated exploitation of technology.” Britons are being rapidly radicalised online and then encouraged to carry out low tech but deadly attacks.

He said: “On top of that, in a range of attacks in Europe and elsewhere, this year we have seen greater ambition for mass casualty attacks.” While the rise of Isil had dominated the headlines in the past 12 months, he said there was still a threat from al-Qaeda terrorists who are also planning massive attacks in the UK. He said: “All of this means that the threat we are facing today is on a scale and at a tempo that I have not seen before in my career.”

First thing to do is stop calling them “Britons.” That word has a very specific meaning, and it does not — and can never — apply to Arabs and Pakistanis. Any more than if a real Briton were to move to Saudi Arabia or Pakistan.

Second thing to do is immediately and publicly deport the extended families of any of them found to be working with ISIS.

Third is to stop allowing them into the country
 
working on a proper response

to all this eveil and provocation and destruction against EuroPUKE

you know, against BUSYBODY!
 
I am sure that Germans are going to be very happy sharing their social safety hammock with so many new supplicants.

:cool:

Plenty of free stuff to go around!
 
Muslim Cleric: “Muslims have the Right to Kill anyone who does Not Respect Islam”


Well, so much for that whole “Religion of Peace” stuff. A video recently surfaced of an interview with a so-called “moderate” Muslim cleric on a Norwegian TV show. The video has gone viral because it shows an Islamic leader in the West being honest about what Islam teaches when it comes to non-Muslims.
 
the signs are so obvious

it cannot be denied, it IS denied, but it cannot be denied

yet NO STEPS are taken to prevent mass murder, indeed, MORE steps are taken to make MASS MURDER happen....SOONER

and yet, BUSYBODY is attacked on LIT
 
or put on IGGY like that poster did

not for REASONS many pruport

but cause BUSYBODY makes them face the truth and they cant handle the truth
 
All countries that say "anyone who gets here can stay here" are now in peril, given the scale of the population movements that are starting to be seen. There are tens – perhaps hundreds – of millions of people, living in poverty and danger who might readily seek to enter a Western country if the opportunity is there.

Who could blame them? Yet no country or continent can open its borders to all comers without fundamentally weakening itself. This is the risk that the countries of Europe now run through misguided altruism.

On a somewhat smaller scale, Australia has faced the same predicament and overcome it. The first wave of illegal arrivals to Australia peaked at 4000 people a year, back in 2001, before the Howard government first stopped the boats: by processing illegal arrivals offshore; by denying them permanent residency; and in a handful of cases, by turning illegal immigrant boats back to Indonesia.

The second wave of illegal boat people was running at the rate of 50,000 a year – and rising fast – by July 2013, when the Rudd government belatedly reversed its opposition to offshore processing; and then my government started turning boats around, even using orange lifeboats when people smugglers deliberately scuttled their vessels.

It's now 18 months since a single illegal boat has made it to Australia. The immigration detention centres have-all-but-closed; budget costs peaking at $4 billion a year have ended; and – best of all – there are no more deaths at sea. That's why stopping the boats and restoring border security is the only truly compassionate thing to do.

Now, while prime minister, I was loath to give public advice to other countries whose situations are different; but because people smuggling is a global problem, and because Australia is the only country that has successfully defeated it – twice, under conservative governments – our experience should be studied.

In Europe, as with Australia, people claiming asylum – invariably – have crossed not one border but many; and are no longer fleeing in fear but are contracting in hope with people smugglers. However desperate, almost by definition, they are economic migrants because they had already escaped persecution when they decided to move again.

Our moral obligation is to receive people fleeing for their lives. It's not to provide permanent residency to anyone and everyone who would rather live in a prosperous Western country than their own. That's why the countries of Europe, while absolutely obliged to support the countries neighbouring the Syrian conflict, are more-than-entitled to control their borders against those who are no longer fleeing a conflict but seeking a better life.

This means turning boats around, for people coming by sea. It means denying entry at the border, for people with no legal right to come; and it means establishing camps for people who currently have nowhere to go.

It will require some force; it will require massive logistics and expense; it will gnaw at our consciences – yet it is the only way to prevent a tide of humanity surging through Europe and quite possibly changing it forever.

We are rediscovering the hard way that justice tempered by mercy is an exacting ideal as too much mercy for some necessarily undermines justice for all.

The Australian experience proves that the only way to dissuade people seeking to come from afar is not to let them in. Working with other countries and with international agencies is important but the only way to stop people trying to gain entry is firmly and unambiguously to deny it – out of the moral duty to protect one's own people and to stamp out people smuggling.
Tony Abbott

Hat tip: http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/#BAPTHhcA1qKu2KSK.99
 
A nearby brick will also do...

;)

You know, if you run across him unexpectedly. Running over him is also a good option.

:D Be sure though, that you remember to back up.
 
Back
Top