Both stories sent back with an accusation of using ChatGPT?!

But if the government develops it, you'll know nothing about it until is too late. Watson's a fun little program. Also, there is Ameca, but when asked if it would hurt us, it said, "I'm not sure why you would think that. My creator has been nothing but kind to me and I am very happy with my current situation." Ameca was developed by UK-based Engineered Arts and is often described as the world's most advanced humanoid robot. What about when it isn't happy?
This may be veering too close to politically charged territory, but governments already have enough nuclear weapons to destroy us, and humans have demonstrated for more hostility toward each other, so that still gets priority on the anxiety list over any AI or robots. And the prospects for global ecological collapse get higher every day, which would likely increase the probability of insane territorial conflicts devolving into nuclear Armageddon.
Personally, as far as saving our species goes, I think it was already too late well before I was born. That's why I dribble away my time writing porn, haha!
 
I just know that several scientists have said AI is something we need to avoid.
This may be veering too close to politically charged territory, but governments already have enough nuclear weapons to destroy us, and humans have demonstrated for more hostility toward each other, so that still gets priority on the anxiety list over any AI or robots. And the prospects for global ecological collapse get higher every day, which would likely increase the probability of insane territorial conflicts devolving into nuclear Armageddon.
Personally, as far as saving our species goes, I think it was already too late well before I was born. That's why I dribble away my time writing porn, haha!
 
Now I want to read some AI written porn just to see how bad or good it is.


Who is better in bed the woman thought, my husband with his one 10 inch dick, or my lover with his five 2 inch dicks. <<< I wish I knew how this AI writing worked so I could see what the computer outputs.
The robot will solve this conundrum by calculating estimated stimulation in each of the woman's vaginas, obviously.
:cool:
 
I just know that several scientists have said AI is something we need to avoid.
Plenty of others think it's a good idea, apparently, since they keep trying to make them better. Not sure how much weight to give to one group's opinions versus the other, except by weighting against my own preference. 🤷‍♀️
 
We may have to agree to disagree, but my argument is that we have basically zero actual examples of how humans and other intelligences would get along. There are many, many depictions in media, both popular and unpopular, of how those people think things would go, but so far those are all speculation, and not credible examples of anything that actually has or likely would happen. There's a wide spectrum so there's a good chance somebody has correctly prophesied the future, but we don't know who yet.
That being said, people's exhibited inability to get along even with other people does not bode especially well for any attempts to get along with an AI or an alien civilization. So I certainly understand taking a dim view of our prospects in that sense. But when we're talking about literary source material, that always skews toward conflict, because that's what generally makes for more compelling reading.
IMHO people need to spend a lot less time worrying about rogue AIs breaking their programming and fucking over the human race, and much more time worrying about tame AIs being perfectly obedient to humans whose intention is to fuck over their fellow humans.

It's not about Skynet triggering nuclear armageddon. It's about some asshole saying "we don't need teachers or doctors any more because AI can do their jobs", or some other asshole using pie-in-the-sky promises about self-driving cars to con people out of their money and distract funding from the less-sexy stuff that actually works.
 
Now the computer in an automobile can drive the car for short distances. (Not talking about self driven cars but your car) it can space its self at one, two, or three car lengths from the car in front of you. Slow you down and speed you up to maintain that distance. Apply the breaks to prevent you re-ending a person. All very useful and makes you feel safe when you drive. Until it doesn't work. I have these comforts in my car. I use them. But still I remain alert to take over it doesn't work.

But some people will trust it blindly and then the glitch happens. Wham, bam, you or someone else is dead.

I don't know if more advanced AIs will be a good thing or a bad thing. I do know, right now, we are generally, the most dangerous threat to humanity. The planet will survive us, it will adapt and recover no matter what we do to it. New life would develop and replace us if we destroy ourselves. Maybe an all seeing, all knowing Ai could help us. Just as likely to hasten our own destruction.

The real danger is the more we depend on tech to solve our problems, the more likely we won't survive if the tech is taken away.

Just my two cents worth.

As to people using AI to screw other people, humans have done a bang up job of that with out any help for millennia. Since the dawn of senescent humas in fact, we've fucking up one another.
 
IMHO people need to spend a lot less time worrying about rogue AIs breaking their programming and fucking over the human race, and much more time worrying about tame AIs being perfectly obedient to humans whose intention is to fuck over their fellow humans.

It's not about Skynet triggering nuclear armageddon. It's about some asshole saying "we don't need teachers or doctors any more because AI can do their jobs", or some other asshole using pie-in-the-sky promises about self-driving cars to con people out of their money and distract funding from the less-sexy stuff that actually works.
Yeah, even if Skynet existed and nuked us, we built the nukes. Artificial intelligence is less of a threat than artificial decency.
 
The site is going ga-ga over AI stuff. The actions/reactions seem rather heavy handed
I agree. Although running an AI over your writer's stories to detect whether they are written by an AI is hilarious, ironic, tone-deaf and heavy-handed. But I think there's a good story in it ...

The owner/mods could be making use of AI to evaluate stories - effectively read them and summarize them quickly - increase and add to their own capabilities - instead they're relying on some system's boolean switch to say "yes" or "no" - the worst possible use of AI IMO.
 
Have you not seen The Matrix? We are just living in an AI-created world. We are programs and nothing more! :ROFLMAO: :p :nana: here I try so hard to educate you, I hand you the red pill, and you invariably spit it out and take the damn blue one. Wake up and smell the programming!;)
IMHO people need to spend a lot less time worrying about rogue AIs breaking their programming and fucking over the human race, and much more time worrying about tame AIs being perfectly obedient to humans whose intention is to fuck over their fellow humans.

It's not about Skynet triggering nuclear armageddon. It's about some asshole saying "we don't need teachers or doctors any more because AI can do their jobs", or some other asshole using pie-in-the-sky promises about self-driving cars to con people out of their money and distract funding from the less-sexy stuff that actually works.
 
I’m a complete newbie, submitted two stories, had them both published, I logged on yesterday and they had both been Sent back with the following note:

Literotica is a storytelling community centered on the sharing of human adult fantasies. While we do not have a policy against using tools to help with the writing process (i.e. spellcheck, grammar suggestions, etc.), we do ask that all work published on the site at this time be created primarily by a human.

I am a software engineer and use ChatGPT for my work, but I never use it for writing, so I am very confused. I’ve reached out to a kindly sub, but does anyone have any experience of this kind of thing? Support process, appeals etc seem very opaque here …

Can you post an exceprt of your story so we can get an idea.
 
Can you post an exceprt of your story so we can get an idea.
"So what do you think?" Cat asked.

A single tear ran down Lucian's cheek. He let it fall, unwiped, his eyes on the TV. His wife sat beside him on the well-worn sofa, but her eyes were clear. Like her husband, she didn't look away from the television, clearly transfixed by the show. Husband and wife held hands, tightly, but they didn't look at each other, only at the screen.

I'd known Lucian and May for a few years, soon after I'd first met their daughter. They were a cute couple, supportive of their daughter and her artistic ambitions, and with a strong sense of right and wrong. I knew that May had been an artist, a potter, and their house was filled with her work. Lucian worked in the city, he was a trader or something, but he wore jeans and old band t-shirts, not suits.

Catalina and I sat across from them, on the second sofa. We were gathered in what May liked to call the "family room", with the board games, the jigsaw puzzles, the music and DVD collection, and the TV set. Usually family and guests would gather here after dinner to play board games, or watch a classic DVD, but tonight was different.
 
A bit clumsy with the commas, but not horrible. Nothing there that makes me think 'machine'.
 
"So what do you think?" Cat asked.

A single tear ran down Lucian's cheek. He let it fall, unwiped, his eyes on the TV. His wife sat beside him on the well-worn sofa, but her eyes were clear. Like her husband, she didn't look away from the television, clearly transfixed by the show. Husband and wife held hands, tightly, but they didn't look at each other, only at the screen.

I'd known Lucian and May for a few years, soon after I'd first met their daughter. They were a cute couple, supportive of their daughter and her artistic ambitions, and with a strong sense of right and wrong. I knew that May had been an artist, a potter, and their house was filled with her work. Lucian worked in the city, he was a trader or something, but he wore jeans and old band t-shirts, not suits.

Catalina and I sat across from them, on the second sofa. We were gathered in what May liked to call the "family room", with the board games, the jigsaw puzzles, the music and DVD collection, and the TV set. Usually family and guests would gather here after dinner to play board games, or watch a classic DVD, but tonight was different.
Assuming those aren't from three different parts of the story, they seem to jump around a bit, so the flow from one to the next isn't as smooth as it could be, which might trigger certain analyzers. The first paragraph is kind of repetitive, which is often found in AI stories, so that might be flagged. And while this is only an excerpt and probably doesn't include character introductions, abrupt entrances and exits of named characters is another possible ping for computer text.
 
Assuming those aren't from three different parts of the story, they seem to jump around a bit, so the flow from one to the next isn't as smooth as it could be, which might trigger certain analyzers. The first paragraph is kind of repetitive, which is often found in AI stories, so that might be flagged. And while this is only an excerpt and probably doesn't include character introductions, abrupt entrances and exits of named characters is another possible ping for computer text.
Thanks for your opinion.
 
A bit clumsy with the commas, but not horrible. Nothing there that makes me think 'machine'.
I must have left out the bit that goes “Bzzt, blorp, I’m a machine! Ban me!” (Note the equally clumsy commas)
 
I’ve been having some fun browsing through stories that haven’t been banned …

Jason sweated. Something was wrong, something was very wrong. And it had never gone so wrong before.

In the middle of flying a Jetstar plane, in which he was privileged enough to be taking flight lessons, he ground his teeth together so hard that his jaw ached. There was a problem there, very much so, but he couldn't take his mind off his flight, his lungs too tight to even get a full breath in.

That may well have not been a problem for very much longer, if he could not land the plane. The storm had come out of nowhere and thrown him off course -- though there was so much more to it than that. One of the engines had failed and the plane was tilting more and more, one engine not enough to power it as he lost increased altitude, going down lower and lower, losing control.

And …

Without asking, Jayne had started touching herself and playing with her tits. That of course had aroused me even more and gave me some wonderful shots. But, of course, it also led to us breaking off the posing when I couldn't stop myself from embracing her, laying on top of her, kissing her and running my hands over her beautifully naked body; she felt lovely.

"This ok Jay?" I completely unnecessarily asked you.

My favourite …

"Can you see anything?" She said, as the water poured out the faucet into the sink.

"Oh yes." I said as I stared up between her legs. I noticed a line bisecting her pussy—her lips. They were probably made a little bigger when she was playing with herself.

"What do you see?" she said.

"It's very nice," I replied. I guess she was unable to tell that my voice was no longer coming from under the sink with the water running. I couldn't help myself and I reached up with both hands and ran them upward.

She jolted and exclaimed, "What are you doing?"

"I'm looking at and feeling a beautiful woman," I replied.

She remained there as my fingers slowly crept their way up her inner thighs.
 
One other question for OP:

You’re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of a sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, it’s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can’t, not without your help. But you’re not helping. Why is that?
 
One other question for OP:

You’re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of a sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, it’s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can’t, not without your help. But you’re not helping. Why is that?
Let me ask you a question @Bramblethorn, have you ever retired a human by mistake?
 
ChatGPT only became a thing about six months ago. I don't think Lit would run stories before 2023 through some sort of AI-recognizing software. That's if they run any stories through AI-recognizing software.
 
One other question for OP:

You’re in a desert walking along in the sand when all of a sudden you look down, and you see a tortoise, it’s crawling toward you. You reach down, you flip the tortoise over on its back. The tortoise lays on its back, its belly baking in the hot sun, beating its legs trying to turn itself over, but it can’t, not without your help. But you’re not helping. Why is that?
My mother? I’ll tell you about my mother …
(Favourite film)
 
This may be veering too close to politically charged territory, but governments already have enough nuclear weapons to destroy us, and humans have demonstrated for more hostility toward each other, so that still gets priority on the anxiety list over any AI or robots. And the prospects for global ecological collapse get higher every day, which would likely increase the probability of insane territorial conflicts devolving into nuclear Armageddon.
Personally, as far as saving our species goes, I think it was already too late well before I was born. That's why I dribble away my time writing porn, haha!
There are nowhere near enough nuclear weapons on earth to destroy humanity. There are more than enough to entirely destroy our civilization - that's a different thing. Humans are remarkably tough to kill, all things considered - we're a particularly stubborn virus.

Modern civilization, though, is incredibly fragile. We exist on the systems and processes developed and dependent on long years of piecemeal advancement. A small peturbation in, say, ammonia supply for the Haber-Bosch process could have catastrophic and far-reaching consequences everywhere.

It wouldn't take much to fuck things up. Nukes would just make it (almost certainly) unrecoverable on timescales of less than a century or two. Probably a 99.99% population die-off to boot, at least, with a catastrophic loss of all knowledge and the depletion of all easily-reachable natural resources (iron, coal, petroleum etc) to permit a reboot.

That said, if the missiles were to fly, I'd be tanking up on whisky and ketamine.
 
There are nowhere near enough nuclear weapons on earth to destroy humanity. There are more than enough to entirely destroy our civilization - that's a different thing. Humans are remarkably tough to kill, all things considered - we're a particularly stubborn virus.

Modern civilization, though, is incredibly fragile. We exist on the systems and processes developed and dependent on long years of piecemeal advancement. A small peturbation in, say, ammonia supply for the Haber-Bosch process could have catastrophic and far-reaching consequences everywhere.

It wouldn't take much to fuck things up. Nukes would just make it (almost certainly) unrecoverable on timescales of less than a century or two. Probably a 99.99% population die-off to boot, at least, with a catastrophic loss of all knowledge and the depletion of all easily-reachable natural resources (iron, coal, petroleum etc) to permit a reboot.

That said, if the missiles were to fly, I'd be tanking up on whisky and ketamine.
Society is nine missed meals from collapse.
 
Back
Top