LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Knife Control in London

I'm hearing much of the knife violence is black on black. Any Londoners here who can confirm or deny?
 
Personally, I find knife fighting to be abhorrent. Maybe we can round up some spare weapons and ammo and ship it to the London gangs and show those weenie Brits what neighborhood violence really looks like.
Why should Chicago have all the fun?
It's the Rahm and Kahn Show!
 
Are they using high-capacity, rapid-fire blades?

Also: could you take a peek at your style guide? Voice-to-text assumes high-capacity requires a hyphen and rapid-fire does not?

Naturally, when I posted the query above it suddenly decided rapid fire requires the hyphen that I added manually above that. It appears that it doesn't know either and just simply alternates between each time you use the phrase rapid fire.
 
Last edited:
Bludgeoning folks to death with raw broccoli can take years. I saw that in the National Enquirer. If you're in a hurry, use an icepick. If no hurry, feed them tainted broccoli.
 
Does any one mind if i copy this to the gun control thread in politics I made a passing comment regarding knife violence coming when guns are gone and this is too timely and hilariously apt for me to not copy a link
 
Roughly 3 mil in Chicago and 9 mil in London, similar to the population of New York, yet London has only had 7 people shot to death in 2018. Bring on strict knife laws.
 
It’s absolutely crazy that elected officials would aim to make it more difficult to kill people. :mad:
 
BotanyBoy said:
So when do we start banning pools, buckets, bath tubs and all sporting equipment?

CARS! Them mother fuckers need to be banned too!

Fuckin' vending machines......if it saves just one life!:mad:
Click to expand...

Okay, I’m all for banning vending machines, and all of the above, if you try and penetrate my body with one.
 
Aglaopheme said:
It’s absolutely crazy that elected officials would aim to make it more difficult to kill people. :mad:
Click to expand...

Its absolutely crazy that we treat grown adults like infantalized children......

Dont worry helicopter mom the government will save us all from our own stupidity and increased government power never goes awry......
 
Aglaopheme said:
It’s absolutely crazy that elected officials would aim to make it more difficult to kill people. :mad:
Click to expand...
Fortunately, Team Tromp is fixing that. Soon every Amerikkkan will be free to shoot, stab, bludgeon, poison, irradiate, stir-fry, strangle, eviscerate, drown, gas, immolate, crush, explode, overwork, or freeze solid anyone, everyone. I'll start with the neighbors and a Molotov cocktail. Who's next?

Broccoli can be deadly in long-term bludgeonings. Ban broccoli for humanity's sake.
 
BotanyBoy said:
And the ASSAULT toasters....
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d3/21/57/d321574c18081823b407dfd8596f0956.gif

Nobody NEEDS that many carbs in their life...they must be banned.

High capacity models especially!
http://popsych.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/bill-murray-toaster-bathtub.jpg

If you need to toast more than 2 pieces of bread at a time you're just compensating for your small penis!!!!
Click to expand...

Yes! Do it!

Which do you think is more likely to kill you? A toaster or Islamic extremist terrorism? The answer may surprise you.

Security guru Bruce Schneier has written a piece entitled Terrorism in the U.S. Since 9/11. As a critic of the excesses of the United States of America’s response to the events of September 11, 2001, Schneier compares the spending on anti-terrorism with the number of lives saved.

In my opinion, the most interesting part was where he refers to a Comparison of Annual Fatality Risks published deep inside Hardly Existential: Terrorism as a Hazard to Human Life by John Mueller and Mark G. Stewart:



You have a 1 in 1,500,000 chance of being killed by a home appliance every year in the United States, but only a 1 in 3,500,000 chance of being killed by terrorism.
Click to expand...


Wait though, how many of them are murdered by toasters?
 
 
Aglaopheme said:
Okay, I’m all for banning vending machines, and all of the above, if you try and penetrate my body with one.
Click to expand...

Other people have killed with them.

I don't have to penetrate a person to kill them.

Why not ban all the deadly things???:confused:

Lead pipes....pressure/rice cookers....most household chemicals, sanitation can be dangerous!!! You must hire government licensed toilet scrubbers because some asshole/moron hundreds if not thousands of miles away fucked up or came unglued so the government decided you're too stupid to do it yourself. Now any time you want a clean shitter that's an 80 dollar service call fee + 120/hr with a minimum of a one hour charge....plus tax of course.

At what point do we stop banning anything and everything because it's scary and can hurt people?

Where do YOU personally draw the legal line in how far the government restricts/prohibits/controls it's people in order to protect people from known-unkown threats/crazy and or their own stupidity?:confused:

Personally I think we should keep everyone but government officials in padded rooms and government camps. All males should be castrated at birth though because they could be rapist.

Women have a propensity for poison people so we can't allow any females any access to any dangerous chemicals. Male doctors and pharmacists only from now on.
 
Last edited:
BotanyBoy said:
Other people have killed with them.

I don't have to penetrate a person to kill them.

Why not ban all the deadly things???:confused:

Lead pipes....pressure/rice cookers....most household chemicals, sanitation can be dangerous!!! You must hire government licensed toilet scrubbers because some asshole/moron hundreds if not thousands of miles away fucked up or came unglued so the government decided you're too stupid to do it yourself. Now any time you want a clean shitter that's an 80 dollar service call fee + 120/hr with a minimum of a one hour charge....plus tax of course.

At what point do we stop banning anything and everything a nut job or an evil fucker use to do horrible things?

Where do YOU personally draw the legal line in how far the government restricts/prohibits/controls it's people in order to protect people from known-unkown threats/crazy and or their own stupidity?
Click to expand...


Let’s see, I’ve an inkling to off you. Perhaps my belongings will become collectibles down to the road. What is the first tool that comes to mind? My rice cooker? No. My toilet brush? Not really.

Not everything that can be dangerous rises to the status of an actual weapon.

I know you can see the difference of something made to inflict harm, and inflict it does, and a handy tool in the moment.

Hey, link me to the last mass murder by toaster.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mello_SixtyNine
Fixing California after the wildfires
Replies
4
Views
420
Shaglus_Ziegler
Shaglus_Ziegler
butters
suicide ruling upheld on woman who had over 20 stab wounds... wtf?
Replies
21
Views
878
Amy_K
Amy_K
DoctorSmith8
Please chime in with some ideas on how to proceed with this sci-fi story...
Replies
7
Views
801
Shaglus_Ziegler
Shaglus_Ziegler
F
David McCallum, star of hit TV series 'The Man From U.N.C.L.E.' and 'NCIS,' dies at 90
Replies
10
Views
1K
butters
butters
F
Al Jaffe, ‘Mad’ Magazine Cartoonist Who Created the ‘Fold-In,’ Dead at 102
Replies
7
Views
576
HumpDayHoratio
HumpDayHoratio
Back
Top