LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Proof that AJ's lying through his teeth - again

ms_ann_thrope said:
Tactics? I'm just having a conversation with a crazy person, that's all.
Click to expand...

Crazy, like spending a decade pretending to be a chick online and wanting to fuck little girls crazy, or like normal, respectable crazy?
 
I can't decide whether this thread was more annoying when it was about AJ or now that it's about Bert. Call it a toss up.
 
BobDownSouth said:
and don't forget the "twin sister" who made medical history as the first prepubescent girl EVER to die of breast cancer. Such sad.
Click to expand...

I didn't pay attention to his posts when he was Karen; it never bothered me that he was pretending to be a woman online until I saw all the underage girls plastered all over his facebook page recently. The police need to seize his computers and then Ann would probably disappear forever.
 
4est_4est_Gump said:
Full Definition of SUBHUMAN
: less than human: as
a : failing to attain the level (as of morality or intelligence) associated with normal human beings
b : unsuitable to or unfit for human beings <subhuman living conditions>
c : of or relating to a taxonomic group lower than that of humans <the subhuman primates>

You make my point for me.

I used it in the spirit of a & b, you went for c.

But they are ranked by commonness of use.

I said that the residents of Haiti, the Islamic radicals and the "victims: of Katrine were ' failing to attain the level (as of morality or intelligence) associated with normal human beings...

When you accept that your only fate is a short, miserable life and do not rise up against it, ever, after centuries, then you are not NORMAL.
Click to expand...

I just caught this little gem. So, to recap:

  • You accept the definition of subhuman provided by butters.
  • So yes, by your admission, the words you used are the literal definition of subhuman. Not only that - per your post, they are the most common usage associated with the word.
  • You are defending that by insisting that what you meant to say is that all residents of Haiti are less moral and below the level of "normal" humans (because their lives suck and it's their fault).
  • In the context of the original thread, which you are so insistent is a key to understanding your words, you used that as an excuse not to express even a small amount of remorse over the death and destruction of the lives of thousands of people (choosing instead to accuse and ridicule those who did) while you were arguing that the US should not send aid.
  • So putting this all together, you did technically call Haitians subhuman, but what you meant was that RESIDENTS of Haiti (completely different thing than "Haitians," okay???) (oh and aka "slaves") are not normal humans and do not deserve help.

Wow, you're a great guy. Please keep going. Can I fetch you a bigger shovel?
 
Phelia said:
I just caught this little gem. So, to recap:

  • You accept the definition of subhuman provided by butters.
  • So yes, by your admission, the words you used are the literal definition of subhuman. Not only that - per your post, they are the most common usage associated with the word.
  • You are defending that by insisting that what you meant to say is that all residents of Haiti are less moral and below the level of "normal" humans (because their lives suck and it's their fault).
  • In the context of the original thread, which you are so insistent is a key to understanding your words, you used that as an excuse not to express even a small amount of remorse over the death and destruction of the lives of thousands of people (choosing instead to accuse and ridicule those who did) while you were arguing that the US should not send aid.
  • So putting this all together, you did technically call Haitians subhuman, but what you meant was that RESIDENTS of Haiti (completely different thing than "Haitians," okay???) (oh and aka "slaves") are not normal humans and do not deserve help.

Wow, you're a great guy. Please keep going. Can I fetch you a bigger shovel?
Click to expand...

My god girl....do you enjoy arguing with a stump? Best not be to verbose with your answer. While your pontificating I might, being the dirty old man I am, sneak up and kiss you smack on the lit. WhoooWaaa!


Comshaw
 
Phelia said:
I just caught this little gem. So, to recap:

  • You accept the definition of subhuman provided by butters.
  • So yes, by your admission, the words you used are the literal definition of subhuman. Not only that - per your post, they are the most common usage associated with the word.
  • You are defending that by insisting that what you meant to say is that all residents of Haiti are less moral and below the level of "normal" humans (because their lives suck and it's their fault).
  • In the context of the original thread, which you are so insistent is a key to understanding your words, you used that as an excuse not to express even a small amount of remorse over the death and destruction of the lives of thousands of people (choosing instead to accuse and ridicule those who did) while you were arguing that the US should not send aid.
  • So putting this all together, you did technically call Haitians subhuman, but what you meant was that RESIDENTS of Haiti (completely different thing than "Haitians," okay???) (oh and aka "slaves") are not normal humans and do not deserve help.

Wow, you're a great guy. Please keep going. Can I fetch you a bigger shovel?
Click to expand...

http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/britneyschalupa/13926004/50122/50122_600.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9wofiCO961qa6g1m.gif

http://www.imgnook.com/b3D6eo.gif

http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m40b68oSHD1qcc2ea.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Justadesperatewifeandmom
  • Locked
Nothing to see here, Justa bit of Florida sunshine with a chance of hurricane.
276 277 278
Replies
7K
Views
664K
AmPic Moderator
AmPic Moderator
Back
Top