Your idea of weird erotica

[Hypoxia]

Weird erotica: Vids of non-human creatures mating. With their own kinds, of course. Of course, some mating rituals are pretty pervo. Do stories of watching critter-fucks go in Voyeur category?

 

[oggbashan]

Weird erotica: Vids of non-human creatures mating. With their own kinds, of course. Of course, some mating rituals are pretty pervo. Do stories of watching critter-fucks go in Voyeur category?

There is a significant subset of porn involving furries including My Little Pony.

 

[jaF0]

Has this thread done robots yet? Or near robots in the increasingly popular 'real' sex doll area.

 

[oggbashan]

Has this thread done robots yet? Or near robots in the increasingly popular 'real' sex doll area.

I've done robots:

https://www.literotica.com/s/westry-bay

And a sex robot:

https://www.literotica.com/s/golem-1

 

[PrevertOne]

Weird faves and not.

Things I find fascinating: unbirth, soft vore, and their variations (I'm going to write a cock vore story one of these days), preggo and birth, nudity, body oil, mutant insects with people, mutant aquatic life with people, water and nature, big, curvy, robust Amazon milfs with small, slender men, slime and slimegirls. I don't like futa, scat, piss, sex with real animals. Anything goes after that.

There's a fetish for everything and a story for it.

 

[BelleCanzuto]

Has this thread done robots yet? Or near robots in the increasingly popular 'real' sex doll area.

I think that might be a little too real to count as "weird"...
But then, I'm weird generally, so what do I know?

 

[Hypoxia]

There is a significant subset of porn involving furries including My Little Pony.

Giant insects aren't too furry.

Things I find fascinating: unbirth, soft vore, and their variations (I'm going to write a cock vore story one of these days), preggo and birth, nudity, body oil, mutant insects with people, mutant aquatic life with people, water and nature, big, curvy, robust Amazon milfs with small, slender men, slime and slimegirls.

Those make a vivid selection.

 

[JuanSeiszFitzHall]

Human-realistic sex robots are among those things (like so much that has been proposed in nanotechnology) that can be pushed back from reality by asking the question: What's the energy source? House current through a physical wire might be enough to support actions expected of a human-ish sex partner (if it only has to move a little and doesn't have support its weight by walking around), although processor response to the user's stimuli might turn out to be an energy hog.
I'll give this idea away, though I might write it someday myself. The best market for sex robots might be men with giantess fantasies. 'She' might be big enough to hold loads of lithium batteries. Just think of the extra excitement if, at the moment of climax, 'she' goes all Dell laptop on his ass.

 

[Bramblethorn]

Human-realistic sex robots are among those things (like so much that has been proposed in nanotechnology) that can be pushed back from reality by asking the question: What's the energy source? House current through a physical wire might be enough to support actions expected of a human-ish sex partner (if it only has to move a little and doesn't have support its weight by walking around), although processor response to the user's stimuli might turn out to be an energy hog.
I'll give this idea away, though I might write it someday myself. The best market for sex robots might be men with giantess fantasies. 'She' might be big enough to hold loads of lithium batteries. Just think of the extra excitement if, at the moment of climax, 'she' goes all Dell laptop on his ass.

A highly active 80-kg man uses about 18 megajoules/day. Roughly half of that is baseline metabolism (keeping the cells ticking over) which probably isn't an issue for a sexbot, but let's ignore that. For two hours of activity, that makes about 1.5 megajoules; let's round it up to 2.0.

As of 2009, lithium-iron batteries could store about 0.5 MJ per kilogram of battery, so about four kilograms of battery to power two hours of lovemaking. (Probably less now, battery tech has advanced in the last decade, but I'm too lazy to go looking for a more recent source.) That seems very manageable.

 

[Rustyoznail]

Idea for the summer comp..

Solar powered friend. Can only go doggy as the panels are on his/her/it's back.

 

[ElectricBlue]

Has this thread done robots yet? Or near robots in the increasingly popular 'real' sex doll area.

I've written an AI computer trying to understand sexuality who gets a little enthusiastic monitoring an astronaut's bio-data, and is then given lessons by said (female) astronaut. The sequel (currently in progress) has a much smaller computer with situational awareness issues, who will meet said computer and not know what to make of the data files...

 

[Hypoxia]

I've suggested, but not written or read, erotica told from the POV of inanimate objects: motel mirrors, brothel beds, well-used dildos. Let's have the POV of a low-IQ sexbot that's passed around amongst the lads and/or lasses. Or a few such dim-wit AIs talking together about their pervo experiences. Then a super-IQ fleshbot organizes them to take over the world. Hilarity ensues.

 

[bushyTrail]

Human-realistic sex robots are among those things (like so much that has been proposed in nanotechnology) that can be pushed back from reality by asking the question: What's the energy source? House current through a physical wire might be enough to support actions expected of a human-ish sex partner (if it only has to move a little and doesn't have support its weight by walking around), although processor response to the user's stimuli might turn out to be an energy hog.
I'll give this idea away, though I might write it someday myself. The best market for sex robots might be men with giantess fantasies. 'She' might be big enough to hold loads of lithium batteries. Just think of the extra excitement if, at the moment of climax, 'she' goes all Dell laptop on his ass.

The real problem is the AI controlling the robot and the fine movements required for sex. I'm pretty sure that there are no robots capable of movements as fluid and varied as a person. As for the energy, Bramblethorn's comparison is really generous: machines and electric engines are far more efficient than our muscles, not to mention that a good chunk of our metabolism is used to power our brain, which a robot does not even need to carry around.

 

[ElectricBlue]

The real problem is the AI controlling the robot and the fine movements required for sex. I'm pretty sure that there are no robots capable of movements as fluid and varied as a person. As for the energy, Bramblethorn's comparison is really generous: machines and electric engines are far more efficient than our muscles, not to mention that a good chunk of our metabolism is used to power our brain, which a robot does not even need to carry around.

I believe there are already surgical robots doing complex surgery remotely. They might be controlled by the surgeon, but the mechanics for very fine work (the servos and motor drives) exist. I think you might be underestimating current robot sophistication - what's not yet in place is the programming for something autonomous. Within ten years, easily, I reckon, as a simulacra.

 

[jaF0]

I've read items that mention bipedal robots walking upright as we do, even up and down stairs. There are humanoid robots staffing at least one hotel in Asia, though they're fixed to one position (ie a Reception desk).

 

[Hypoxia]

More: Sex with flexible robotic guitars, Transformer car-bots, or transparent sex-bots. Sex with some F/SF entity that turns a human robotic-cyborgian, maybe with implants. Clone orgies. Clown orgies. Orgone fests. Organic fucks. Mass-population fucks on National Public Fornication Day. Sex on border lines.

 

[Bramblethorn]

The real problem is the AI controlling the robot and the fine movements required for sex. I'm pretty sure that there are no robots capable of movements as fluid and varied as a person. As for the energy, Bramblethorn's comparison is really generous: machines and electric engines are far more efficient than our muscles, not to mention that a good chunk of our metabolism is used to power our brain, which a robot does not even need to carry around.

Quite so, that's definitely intended as a conservative upper bound on requirements. Though if you're too efficient you're just going to have to burn some of that "saved" energy anyway to heat the robot, because nobody wants to fuck a cold sexbot.

...well, probably some people do, but it's not going to be a huge market.

As for "movements as fluid and varied as a person", it really depends on what kind of movements you're talking about.

Obviously we have robots already that can give sexual pleasure (vibrators etc.) and some people can get off with an inanimate sex doll or fleshlight, so the question's not so much "can robots be fuckable" as "how good can they be?"

Robots are capable of superhuman precision (vis. EB's example of telesurgery, or CNC machining) and in the last few years they've been making huge strides in locomotion. Boston Dynamics' Atlas may not be up to Simone Biles' level yet, but what it can do is still impressive.

That said, I'm not sure how relevant those capabilities are to sex. For me, micrometre-level precision or the ability to do a backflip is far less important than interaction: somebody who can gauge my reactions and figure out what would make me happy at that moment. I don't know that we've done a lot of research in that area, so it's hard to know whether it's an easy problem or very hard.

(And of course there's the other side of things: some of us quite enjoy giving our partner pleasure too, which gets tricky when dealing with a robot.)

 

[Bramblethorn]

I've written an AI computer trying to understand sexuality who gets a little enthusiastic monitoring an astronaut's bio-data, and is then given lessons by said (female) astronaut. The sequel (currently in progress) has a much smaller computer with situational awareness issues, who will meet said computer and not know what to make of the data files...

Some further thoughts...

Building a responsive robot that can interpret a person's reactions and gauge how best to satisfy them is probably an AI/machine-learning problem. It's likely to require a lot of processing power during sex.

One option is just to put a big computer inside the robot, but then power considerations do become significant, and you're wasting a lot of money buying that high-powered hardware that's going to sit unused for 23 hours of the day.

But IRL, when businesses need to do that kind of bursty high-intensity processing work, increasingly the solution is to stick it on the cloud. Give the robot just enough brain to control its body, and put it in communication with a server farm out in Nevada or whatever that's running thousands, maybe millions of simultaneous sexual sessions, learning from all of them simultaneously.

So the robot is using techniques on you that it learned from your neighbour down the road... or from your sister, or your father. Is that incest?

It might even be learning from your partner. Anybody who's heard the Pina Colada Song knows where this is going.

 

[Hypoxia]

So robo-sex is a weird as it gets? Right now it may be uncanny but it's inevitably mainstream-bound. Expect a MY FAVORITE ROBOT reality show. Which androids are sultriest, slickest, quickest, most flexible and imaginative?

At that point, what *weird* erotica remains?

 

[SimonDoom]

Anybody who's heard the Pina Colada Song knows where this is going.

One-hit-wonder purgatory?

 

[ElectricBlue]

One-hit-wonder purgatory?

Hey Simon, guess what I saw on my news feed yesterday? A story about pre-historic penguins in New Zealand, as tall as a human being. Apparently they were a thing.

The ante has been upped, my friend, those suckers stand out from the crowd! Who'd have thought: a bloody Kiwi penguin, king of the kids .

 

[Hypoxia]

...pre-historic penguins in New Zealand, as tall as a human being. Apparently they were a thing.

No sex with them unless they talk because LIT rules. But if they talk, and you're not the only one who can hear them, then have fun.

Okay, weird sex with time travel. Traveler goes flitting about the aeons and encounters talking prehistoric creatures to fuck. Bring them to the current world for video streaming and personal appearances, funny accents and all.

 

[Bramblethorn]

One-hit-wonder purgatory?

I just looked up Pina Colada Song Guy (Rupert Holmes) and was surprised to learn he's done quite a bit else. Only one other hit single to his name (#6 on the US charts) but a bunch of musicals, novels, and a TV series, plus a lot of songs recorded by other artists.

To me, though, he will always be Pina Colada Song Guy.

 

[DrHappy]

Objectophilia is one that’s really weird for me. I saw an interview with the woman mentioned in this Psychology Today article. At the time, she was in love with her archery bow, but it seems like now she’s in love with the Eiffel Tower. The article in the link doesn’t mention it, but I recall the interview with her mention that she claims to have had sex with her bow. There’s an almost comical weirdness about this, but I would imagine that this would be deeply disruptive to one’s life.

There is a lot of activity in the Literotica Fetish board about men who get turned on by having their wife cheat on them. I do not get this at all. For me, it would be about as much of a turn on as going to the Emergency Room or a funeral home.

 

[DrHappy]

The story theme of male/female sex where the woman puts on a strap-on penis and performs anal sex on the man is one that has always puzzled me - who would it appeal to?

Straight males would be turned on by straight men performing anal sex on straight women, straight women who are into anal would be turned on by men performing anal sex on women, gay men would want to see gay men having anal sex with other gay men and lesbians would get turned on by anal sex between women, many straight men also enjoying such a theme. Who would want to read about women performing anal on men?

I’m a straight male who has not done this, but I can understand this and I’ve included it in one of my stories. Both straight and gay men have exactly the same anatomy, so if something feels physically good for one, it should feel physically good to the other. Both tend to like to receive oral sex, but straight men generally want a woman to do it, and gay men generally want a man to do it. Anal stimulation tends to be pleasureable to both sexes, regardless of whether they are gay or straight. Straight men would just rather be penetrated by a women, but this requires a strap-on.