Justadesperatewifeandmom
digital demi-god
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2017
- Posts
- 27,597
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
happy thurday.
yup, I have to look like I care again today.
if this jacket had a button, I think I could close it though
http://i.imgur.com/mjUCHsgm.jpg
and of course a thong since it is thursday
http://i.imgur.com/tTzpLN7m.jpg
Damn. Rolling out the ridiculous hotness right out the gate this morning.
You do look like you care... about showing off your assets at least.
Good stuff
I agree that jacket might fasten where your hands are, but not across your breasts.
That thong is looking a bit shiny.
Great pair of shots. Thank goodness it's Thursday!
Well fuck, if I have to close a blazer across my tits, I just fucking give up. buttons and my tits, simply not meant to be. and yes the thong is shiny. Victoria's secret calls the shade Ripe Apricot Shimmer
Sometimes, life is all about the beautiful struggle.
That definitely includes the struggle between breasts and buttons - it came be both distracting and tantalizing.
Well I always encourage your indecency.
So it works like a shutter ? Is it fully automatic or do you have to set the timingJustadesperatewifeandmom said:Well the blouse underneath does actually cover my tits when I am not photographing them. thanks.
The less decency the better.
Almost swallowed my tongue on this last one..and i can think of a much better place for it!!
thank you. i tryYeah those are indecent. Nicely done.
Are you saying you don't even see my extremely fashion forward 100% polyester probably 15 year old blazer.Wait, what jacket?!?!? I just see delicious bust!
So it works like a shutter ? Is it fully automatic or do you have to set the timing
manually ?
The less decency the better.
Here's a nifty formula to keep in mind:
decency x wankability = constant
To solve this for wankability we divide by decency and get:
wankability = constant / decency
So as decency approaches zero the wankability approaches infinity
Except if the constant happens to be zero in which case the wankability
is undefined as decency approaches zero and zero otherwise.
But don't worry, in your case the constant is quite high.
LMAO
It's funny because it is true
I'd be in agreement on the side note. I am convinced there are people whose entire careers are spent scheduling meetings, going to meetings - and never actually doing anything. I am pretty sure "business meetings" is a level of hell Dante missed.
As for the Bane of Buttons. Have you considered....straps?
If they were puppies everyone would find that cute and adorable.if my tits sense a camera pointed at me, they just sort of pop out.
Correct! (typed with left hand )Justadesperatewifeandmom said:and I am glad you find my constant high, so my wankability increases as my decency decreases
If they were puppies everyone would find that cute and adorable.
Correct! (typed with left hand )
Yes of course. Just ignore anyone who says "too old to be cute"well I think everyone still finds it quite and adorable because I am cute and adorable damn it. and great typing with your left hand.
if my tits sense a camera pointed at me, they just sort of pop out.
and I am glad you find my constant high, so my wankability increases as my decency decreases
it is, it is
have you had the meetings to discuss how to have less meetings?
I am sure you saw my pleather top with the zipper and straps....that didn't work out so well either. or it worked out very well. I guess it depends on perspective.
Yes but unfortunately the constant appears to be negative in those casesAnd, for the official record, I like the "wankability as the inverse of decency" index. Does it apply to men too?