You've got to be kidding me

angelicminx

Loving the monkey!
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Posts
3,490
http://www.cnn.com/video/player/pla...2007/06/05/wheller.il.yelling.no.diploma.whoi


Illinois Students Lose Diplomas Over Cheers
By JAN DENNIS
AP

GALESBURG, Illinois (June 2) - Caisha Gayles graduated with honors last month, but she is still waiting for her diploma. The reason: the whoops of joy from the audience as she crossed the stage.

Gayles was one of five students denied diplomas from the lone public high school in Galesburg after enthusiastic friends or family members cheered for them during commencement.

About a month before the May 27 ceremony, Galesburg High students and their parents had to sign a contract promising to act in dignified way. Violators were warned they could be denied their diplomas and barred from the after-graduation party.

Many schools across the country ask spectators to hold applause and cheers until the end of graduation. But few of them enforce the policy with what some in Galesburg say are strong-arm tactics.

In Galesburg, the issue has taken on added controversy with accusations that the students were targeted because of their race: four are black and one is Hispanic. Parents say cheers also erupted for white students, and none of them was denied a diploma.

"It was like one of the worst days of my life," said Gayles, who had a 3.4 grade-point average and officially graduated, but does not have the keepsake diploma to hang on her wall. "You walk across the stage and then you can't get your diploma because of other people cheering for you. It was devastating, actually."

School officials in Galesburg, a working-class town of 34,000 that is still reeling from the 2004 shutdown of a 1,600-employee refrigerator factory, said the get-tough policy followed a 2005 commencement where hoots, hollers and even air horns drowned out much of the ceremony and nearly touched off fights in the audience when the unruly were asked to quiet down.

"Lots of parents complained that they could not hear their own child's name called," said Joel Estes, Galesburg's assistant superintendent. "And I think that led us to saying we have to do something about this to restore some dignity and honor to the ceremony so that everyone can appreciate it and enjoy it."

In Indianapolis, public school officials this year started kicking out parents and relatives who cheer. At one school, the superintendent interrupted last month's graduation to order police to remove a woman from the gymnasium.

"It's an important, solemn occasion. There's plenty of time for celebration before and after," said Clarke Campbell, president of the Indianapolis school board.

Principal Tom Chiles said administrators who monitored the more than 2,000-seat auditorium reported only disruptions they considered "significant," and all turned in the same five names.

"Race had absolutely nothing to do with it whatsoever," Chiles said. "It is the amount of disruption at the time of the incident."

School officials said they will hear students and parents out if they appeal. Meanwhile, the school said the five students can still get their diplomas by completing eight hours of public service work, answering phones, sorting books or doing other chores for the district, situated about 150 miles southwest of Chicago.

Gayles' mother said she plans to fight the school board - in court if necessary - to get her daughter's diploma. The noise "was like three seconds. It was like, `Yay,' and that was it," Carolyn Gayles said.

American Civil Liberties Union spokesman Edward Yohnka said Galesburg's policy raises no red flags as long as it is enforced equitably. "It's probably well within the school's ability to control the decorum at an event like this," he said.

Another student who was denied her diploma, Nadia Trent, said she will probably let the school keep it if her appeals fail.

"It's not fair. Somebody could not like me and just decide to yell to get me in trouble. I can't control everyone, just the ones I gave tickets to," Trent said.

http://news.aol.com/topnews/article...r/20070601155509990001?ncid=NWS00010000000001



Okay, I've read accounts of things being thrown, air horns being used, silly string, things like that, and I agree with them not being appropriate, but CHEERING? C'mon!

The argument seems to be that the audience can't hear the next name. Duh! Don't say the next name until the cheering subsides. Haven't teachers at this point perfected the 'hold your hand up to get silence' technique?

I remember my high school graduation and I remember thinking, "Could ya slow down just a bit?" I enjoyed the cheers given to my fellow students, and cheered for a lot of them myself. A couple of seconds of cheering doesn't hurt anyone, build it into the length of the ceremony. Cut the speech given by the principal or whichever NON-STUDENT is speaking. (Y'all know the one I'm talking about. The one that drones on and on. The one that makes you want to shoot yourself, if only to make them stop speaking.)

I understand that not all students are going to get cheers. At that stage in life I really don't think it's going to cause self-esteem issues. I think they'd be pretty well established by then.


Maybe I'm just way off base here, but that's the way I feel about it. Oh, and before anyone mentions it, yes I know they signed an agreement and were aware of what could happen. IMO that still doesn't make the policy right.


 
Appalling, absolutely appalling.

When I graduated, my ceremony was one constant sound of applause as everyone aplauded for everyone else, and there were groups who were louder, cheering, and whistling...it was all part of the joy.

I agree the air horns would have been a tad too much, but cheering?? Sheesh.
 
All I can remember hearing from my graduation is a fly batting against the window and someone snoring quietly
 
If they no wanna deal with the consequences, they shoulda no signed the agreement. It's an unpleasant policy, and complaining after you get jacked by it is kinda selfish. I fell confidant a LOT of other parents would have loved to have acted the fool and cheered and what not for their kid--and probably feel a little put out that these folks are bitchin' about breaking what rule /they/ obeyed.

Either way... this just doesn't register as that big of a deal to me. I graduated, once or twice, I could care about getting the piece of paper--as a matter of fact, I don't think I actually /did/ get the high school one. Its a vanity, which doesn't make it pointless, but it does reduce its importance.

Its a ceremony... order has to be maintained. I don't disagree with the school enforcing a policy the parents and students agreed to. Shame on the parents and students.
 
angelicminx said:
"Lots of parents complained that they could not hear their own child's name called," said Joel Estes, Galesburg's assistant superintendent. "And I think that led us to saying we have to do something about this to restore some dignity and honor to the ceremony so that everyone can appreciate it and enjoy it."

In Indianapolis, public school officials this year started kicking out parents and relatives who cheer. At one school, the superintendent interrupted last month's graduation to order police to remove a woman from the gymnasium.

"It's an important, solemn occasion. There's plenty of time for celebration before and after," said Clarke Campbell, president of the Indianapolis school board.

1. Buy a fucking microphone.

2. Huh? Seriously. Why?
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
If they no wanna deal with the consequences, they shoulda no signed the agreement. It's an unpleasant policy, and complaining after you get jacked by it is kinda selfish. I fell confidant a LOT of other parents would have loved to have acted the fool and cheered and what not for their kid--and probably feel a little put out that these folks are bitchin' about breaking what rule /they/ obeyed.

Either way... this just doesn't register as that big of a deal to me. I graduated, once or twice, I could care about getting the piece of paper--as a matter of fact, I don't think I actually /did/ get the high school one. Its a vanity, which doesn't make it pointless, but it does reduce its importance.

Its a ceremony... order has to be maintained. I don't disagree with the school enforcing a policy the parents and students agreed to. Shame on the parents and students.
I agree with Joe's post in its every line and member.
 
angelicminx said:
School officials said they will hear students and parents out if they appeal. Meanwhile, the school said the five students can still get their diplomas by completing eight hours of public service work, answering phones, sorting books or doing other chores for the district, situated about 150 miles southwest of Chicago.
This is what confuses me. WHY should the STUDENTS have to do hours of public service in penance for this disruption? The implication is that the students induced the parents, etc. to cheer--gave them the horns and noise makers.

Shouldn't the parents and friends be forced to do the community service? They, not the student, disrupted the ceremony. Unless the student walked across the stage blowing their own horn :rolleyes:
 
Liar said:
1. Buy a fucking microphone.

2. Huh? Seriously. Why?


Liar, you keep getting blind-sided by the quantity and quality of American Yahooisms, don't you! :)

You know those westerns where you see the saloon and bullets are flying and the piano is tinkling and bodies are being thrown through the door? That's what it's like here. EVERYTHING is like that. Politics, families, schools; wherever there are more than ten people in one place, decorum disappears.
 
A much wiser head than mine - that of the redoubtable Miss Manners, in fact - once opined that the problem with matters on which general social consensus and enforcement fails is that governing bodies then feel obliged to step in. The solution is inevitably silly and heavy-handed (like punishing people not actually in control of the jubilation of their comrades); it is also inevitably easily avoidable with the smallest exercise of self control and respect for others (like not screaming, as I witnessed at one of my own graduations, in such a loud and prolonged fashion that even after a lengthy pause, they were still drowning out the next name). Some people do like a reasonably solemn and ceremonial conference of their degrees or diplomas; these are the people for whom the ceremony has been arranged. Behaving as if one is at a football game and attempting to drown out the other side's cheers is not appropriate.

That said, I don't believe that Herself has ever condoned a method of intervention that punishes innocent parties. She tends to stress both a cooperation of all members of the social group in communicating standards (teaching our children to behave well, mastering the art of the frosty stare) and the reasonable actions of the persons in charge of an event. That would be the school, and I'm surprised that they haven't had the sense to simply have ushers present to request silence, or more effective still, to have the person reading names wait the first bout of cheering all the way through, wait for another quiet and uncomfortable fifteen or twenty seconds while staring at the persons in question as if making sure that they are quite through, and then continue. I doubt you'd see it more than once.

Shanglan
 
Last edited:
Stella_Omega said:
You know those westerns where you see the saloon and bullets are flying and the piano is tinkling and bodies are being thrown through the door? That's what it's like here. EVERYTHING is like that. Politics, families, schools; wherever there are more than ten people in one place, decorum disappears.
That's what's missing from my family arguments...the piano!
 
BlackShanglan said:
A much wiser head than mine - that of the redoubtable Miss Manners, in fact - once opined that the problem with matters on which general social consensus and enforcement fails is that governing bodies then feel obliged to step in. The solution is inevitably silly and heavy-handed (like punishing people not actually in control of the jubilation of their comrades); it is also inevitably easily avoidable with the smallest exercise of self control and respect for others (like not screaming, as I witnessed at one of my own graduations, in such a loud and prolonged fashion that even after a lengthy pause, they were still drowning out the next name). Some people do like a reasonably solemn and ceremonial conference of their degrees or diplomas; these are the people for whom the ceremony has been arranged. Behaving as if one is at a football game and attempting to drown out the other side's cheers is not appropriate.

That said, I don't believe that Herself has ever condoned a method of intervention that punishes innocent parties. She tends to stress both a cooperation of all members of the social group in communicating standards (teaching our children to behave well, mastering the art of the frosty stare) and the reasonable actions of the persons in charge of an event. That would be the school, and I'm surprised that they haven't had the sense to simply have ushers present to request silence, or more effective still, to have the person reading names wait the first bout of cheering all the way through, wait for another quiet and uncomfortable fifteen or twenty seconds while staring at the persons in question as if making sure that they are quite through, and then continue. I doubt you'd see it more than once.

Shanglan
That kind of crowd management isn't taught any longer.
 
Liar said:
1. Buy a fucking microphone.

2. Huh? Seriously. Why?
There's no question all of them use a microphone. People don't understand how limited sound reinforcement is in a situation like this. You speak in a different register and with different dynamics than you sing with. You can only turn the speakers up so loud before you are blistering the first few rows (and someone sitting behind a group of 10-15 people screaming still won't hear a word of what's going on). My initial reaction to the story was annoyance, but after reading the whole thing I'm with Joe. People suck nowadays. I sat in a movie theater watching Shrek with my 7 year-old and a group of 5 or 6 18-22 year olds sat right next to us. They talked to each other, on the cell phones, and one of them was watching a video on his phone with the volume up loud enough that you could clearly hear it during the quiet spots. At some point there does have to be rules enforced and I don't buy for a second that the cheering was, "like three seconds," bullshit. It was supposed to be a memorable moment for everyone, so if you didn't get your diploma or get to go to the party afterwards, next time tell your family to act like they understand that it's important for the family of the child whose parents are sitting behind you as well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top