"You gotta link for that?"

M

miles

Guest
It's no coincidence that the least informed, most narrow-minded Litters are typically the ones who ask for a "cite" or scream "Link!" Their attitude seems to be "if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist."

Search engines are your friend. Laziness will make you stupid.
 
It's no coincidence that the least informed, most narrow-minded Litters are typically the ones who ask for a "cite" or scream "Link!" Their attitude seems to be "if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist."

Search engines are your friend. Laziness will make you stupid.

Could you direct me to a single one of your posts where you stated an opinion and backed it up with a reasoned analysis? You are probably the emptiest of the empty suits on here, and have the temerity to post the above?

Mind boggling.
 
It's no coincidence that the least informed, most narrow-minded Litters are typically the ones who ask for a "cite" or scream "Link!" Their attitude seems to be "if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist."

Search engines are your friend. Laziness will make you stupid.

Link?:rolleyes:
 
It's no coincidence that the least informed, most narrow-minded Litters are typically the ones who ask for a "cite" or scream "Link!" Their attitude seems to be "if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist."

Search engines are your friend. Laziness will make you stupid.
It could be because people know if they search for key phrases in your posts that they will have to wade through hundreds of cross posts on right wing blogs/forums/"news" sites to maybe find the original source that, in all likelihood, will turn out to be wrong anyway.
 
It's no coincidence that the least informed, most narrow-minded Litters are typically the ones who ask for a "cite" or scream "Link!" Their attitude seems to be "if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist."

Search engines are your friend. Laziness will make you stupid.

I'd like to see what evidence you have to back up that claim :rolleyes:
 
This thread should be a sticky, as an example of one of the dumbest things ever posted on Lit.
 
It's no coincidence that the least informed, most narrow-minded Litters are typically the ones who ask for a "cite" or scream "Link!" Their attitude seems to be "if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist."

Search engines are your friend. Laziness will make you stupid.

actually YOU miss the point

its NOT that that they cant look it up

its that they want YOU to post a link, so that the LINK can be discredited with whatever means available
 
It's no coincidence that the least informed, most narrow-minded Litters are typically the ones who ask for a "cite" or scream "Link!" Their attitude seems to be "if I don't know about it, it doesn't exist."

No, the best-informed, most broad-minded Litsters' attitude is, "If you claim it, you should be ready to prove it. Don't try to make me do your research for you, asshole."

Which is exactly the same as the attitude of, well, anybody anywhere with any lick of common sense.
 
Last edited:
Could you direct me to a single one of your posts where you stated an opinion and backed it up with a reasoned analysis? You are probably the emptiest of the empty suits on here, and have the temerity to post the above?

Mind boggling.


This seems like a long winded and wordy way of saying, "citation please?"

Mind boggling indeed.
 
Have you ever seen that bumper-sticker that says "Cite?"?

It was inspired by the frequent cite-requests on the Straight Dope Message Board (a spinoff, as it were, of the The Straight Dope column ("Fighting Ignorance Since 1973! (It's taking longer than we thought)") of Chicagoan Cecil Adams (or Ed Zotti, that's a matter of endless debate), which you might have seen in free weekly tabloids like Creative Loafing or The Weekly Planet.) And the SDMB sets the gold standard for messageboards. (I post there as BrainGlutton, for many years now.) If you can't bring the cite, you'll be laughed off the page, as you should be; and if you take the attitude miles is expressing here, the Mods will probably and fairly ban you from the board. (miles wouldn't last a week on the SDMB, not even if he limited himself to posting only in the BBQ Pit forum, the only Dope forum where direct insults are allowed -- even that has rules, and you can get banned for breaking them repeatedly after Mod-warnings. Which miles would.) If you want to assert something, you always have to bring the cites yourself, that's only reasonable.

Go thou and do likewise.
 
Last edited:
So, if you claim something is false you ought to be able to prove it as well.

Sure. After the person who made the assertion brings the cites.

Really, this is as if you were to sue me for breach of contract, without providing the contract or even alleging when or where an oral conract might have been made or what were its terms, and then said, "Prove you didn't breach it!" You'd be laughed out of court, even small-claims court.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top