You are a sick, sick woman, Anna

Teen sex study doubts "technical virginity"
Tue May 20, 2008 2:18pm EDT
By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A survey examining sexual practices of U.S. teens has undercut the notion that many engage in oral sex rather than intercourse to stay "technically" virgins, researchers said on Tuesday.

The findings, published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, were based on answers by 2,271 females and males age 15 to 19 in 2002 in response to a government survey.

The researchers found about 55 percent of the teens said they had engaged in oral sex but that this practice was far more common among those who also had engaged in vaginal sex.

Teens said they began vaginal and oral sex at roughly the same time -- by six months after first vaginal intercourse, 82 percent had also engaged in oral sex, according to the study.

"There is a widespread belief that teens engage in nonvaginal forms of sex, especially oral sex, as a way to be sexually active while still claiming that, technically, they are virgins," Laura Lindberg of the Guttmacher Institute in New York, who led the study, said in a statement.

"However, our research shows that this supposed substitution of oral sex for vaginal sex is largely a myth. There is no good evidence that teens who have not had intercourse engage in oral sex with a series of partners."

The Guttmacher Institute studies sexual and reproductive health issues.

About one in 10 of the teens said they had engaged in anal sex. These teens were far more likely to have also engaged in vaginal sex.

"Teens of white ethnicity and higher socioeconomic status were more likely than their peers to have ever had oral or anal sex," the researchers wrote.

Lindberg said the new findings illustrate that the Bush administration's emphasis on school programs teaching sexual abstinence until marriage "does not give teens the skills and information they need to be safe."

Statistics released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in March showed that more than one in four U.S. teen girls was infected with at least one sexually transmitted disease. The CDC said in December the birth rate for U.S. teens rose in 2006 for the first time since 1991.

Lindberg said the Guttmacher Institute's findings have health policy implications.

"While oral and anal sex carry no risk of pregnancy, engaging in these behaviors can nevertheless put teens at risk of sexually transmitted infections," she said.

"Counseling and education should take into account total STI risk by addressing the full range of behaviors that teens engage in, including oral and anal sex."

(Editing by John O'Callaghan)
 
Teen sex study doubts "technical virginity"
Tue May 20, 2008 2:18pm EDT
By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A survey examining sexual practices of U.S. teens has undercut the notion that many engage in oral sex rather than intercourse to stay "technically" virgins, researchers said on Tuesday.

The findings, published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, were based on answers by 2,271 females and males age 15 to 19 in 2002 in response to a government survey.

The researchers found about 55 percent of the teens said they had engaged in oral sex but that this practice was far more common among those who also had engaged in vaginal sex.

Teens said they began vaginal and oral sex at roughly the same time -- by six months after first vaginal intercourse, 82 percent had also engaged in oral sex, according to the study.

"There is a widespread belief that teens engage in nonvaginal forms of sex, especially oral sex, as a way to be sexually active while still claiming that, technically, they are virgins," Laura Lindberg of the Guttmacher Institute in New York, who led the study, said in a statement.

"However, our research shows that this supposed substitution of oral sex for vaginal sex is largely a myth. There is no good evidence that teens who have not had intercourse engage in oral sex with a series of partners."

The Guttmacher Institute studies sexual and reproductive health issues.

About one in 10 of the teens said they had engaged in anal sex. These teens were far more likely to have also engaged in vaginal sex.

"Teens of white ethnicity and higher socioeconomic status were more likely than their peers to have ever had oral or anal sex," the researchers wrote.

Lindberg said the new findings illustrate that the Bush administration's emphasis on school programs teaching sexual abstinence until marriage "does not give teens the skills and information they need to be safe."

Statistics released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in March showed that more than one in four U.S. teen girls was infected with at least one sexually transmitted disease. The CDC said in December the birth rate for U.S. teens rose in 2006 for the first time since 1991.

Lindberg said the Guttmacher Institute's findings have health policy implications.

"While oral and anal sex carry no risk of pregnancy, engaging in these behaviors can nevertheless put teens at risk of sexually transmitted infections," she said.

"Counseling and education should take into account total STI risk by addressing the full range of behaviors that teens engage in, including oral and anal sex."

(Editing by John O'Callaghan)

I note they do not include handjobs there, even though they are probably more common than oral sex. I don't object to girls or women doing such things to be able to claim technical virginity. I do object to misleading or incorrect reports. :(
 
The article illustrates wonderfully how to lie by telling the truth. Now since I don't know the truth in this situation, I don't know that this article does do so, but it still illustrates the techniques.
Teen sex study doubts "technical virginity"
Tue May 20, 2008 2:18pm EDT
By Will Dunham

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A survey examining sexual practices of U.S. teens has undercut the notion that many engage in oral sex rather than intercourse to stay "technically" virgins, researchers said on Tuesday.
Here we have an example of unsupported assertion. That assertion may, or may not be true, but there is no evidence cited here.
The findings, published in the Journal of Adolescent Health, were based on answers by 2,271 females and males age 15 to 19 in 2002 in response to a government survey.
A straight forward statement of fact. Since this is checkable, it is probably true. However, note the ages given: 15 to 19. In the rest of the article, only the word 'teens' is used, which will imply (inaccurately if this statement is correct) that the age range is 13-19.
The researchers found about 55 percent of the teens said they had engaged in oral sex but that this practice was far more common among those who also had engaged in vaginal sex.
OK, but what about the reverse? Of course I'd expect more of those who are fucking to give blow jobs as well (though there is nothing in the article about gender differences, so it may be these are guys eating out their girls.) The significant omission is about those giving (and getting) oral sex, but not engaging in PIV sex. Unfortunately, that's the information that may or may not support the opening assertion...
Teens said they began vaginal and oral sex at roughly the same time -- by six months after first vaginal intercourse, 82 percent had also engaged in oral sex, according to the study.
Agin, that is one-sided. The information required to judge that original assertion is the proportion of suckers who are also fuckers, not the other way round.
"There is a widespread belief that teens engage in nonvaginal forms of sex, especially oral sex, as a way to be sexually active while still claiming that, technically, they are virgins," Laura Lindberg of the Guttmacher Institute in New York, who led the study, said in a statement.
And nothing actually stated in the article challenges that belief.
"However, our research shows that this supposed substitution of oral sex for vaginal sex is largely a myth. There is no good evidence that teens who have not had intercourse engage in oral sex with a series of partners."
Another unsupported assertion. It may be true (since it's a direct quote, it may well be), but this article provides no relevant evidence that it is. Remember that, "No good evidence" is a classic way in academic circles to express ignorance; it doesn't mean that there is good evidence to the contrary (as implied by the way it is used in this article.) Also note: "with a series of partners." The quotation does [B]not[/B] say anything whatever about single partners (and I believe that teens are often romantic rather than promiscuous - sure sex just as sex is attractive, but in practice, I suspect that being in love has a wider relevance than many give credence).
The Guttmacher Institute studies sexual and reproductive health issues.
This is the second purely factual, checkable statement. It isn't germane to the argument, except by giving possibly spurious credibility by association.
About one in 10 of the teens said they had engaged in anal sex. These teens were far more likely to have also engaged in vaginal sex.
Yet again, this is the wrong way round for evidence in favour of the argument made. If they are arse fuckers, then of course they are cunt fuckers as well. This says nothing whatever useful about whether many, most, or just a few engage in PIV sex.
"Teens of white ethnicity and higher socioeconomic status were more likely than their peers to have ever had oral or anal sex," the researchers wrote.
Signifying just what? If I'm right, these groups correlate well with better education - and good education leads to greater curiosity. Whether it also leads to better wisdom is WAY outside the scope of this article.
Lindberg said the new findings illustrate that the Bush administration's emphasis on school programs teaching sexual abstinence until marriage "does not give teens the skills and information they need to be safe."
I do believe that assertion. What I've heard about those programs is that they don't justify their message beyond, "It's wrong and immoral!" Kids maybe rightly dismiss that as argument by assertion.
Statistics released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in March showed that more than one in four U.S. teen girls was infected with at least one sexually transmitted disease. The CDC said in December the birth rate for U.S. teens rose in 2006 for the first time since 1991.
Cunning ploy to run those together into a single paragraph. Probably they are related - both consequences follow from unsafe sex. However, neither says anything about safe sex.
Lindberg said the Guttmacher Institute's findings have health policy implications.

"While oral and anal sex carry no risk of pregnancy, engaging in these behaviors can nevertheless put teens at risk of sexually transmitted infections," she said.

"Counseling and education should take into account total STI risk by addressing the full range of behaviors that teens engage in, including oral and anal sex."
A straight, three paragraph quote - probably accurate, and almost certainly based on research that is far more objective than this article.
(Editing by John O'Callaghan)
Whoever he is...

I get more and more depressed by much media reporting on controversial subjects such as sex. A balanced report that offered all the relevant evidence, not a one-sided extract, would still be titillating and pull in the readers. To a degree, we're all prurient and want to know about other peoples sex lives. "Why spoil a good story for the sake of the truth?" is an attitude that suppresses truth and simply reinforces prejudice.

I deplore it.
 
Back
Top