Yes, An Ordered Civilized Society Is Racist

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
61,871

Apparently You’re A White Supremacist If You Show Up To Work On Time​

3 Comments / By Shay Bottomley / July 11, 2024

Cultural expectations such as punctuality, perfectionism, and individualism key characteristics of “white supremacy culture” according to a document from Duke University’s School of Medicine. Who knew?

As part of its “Critical Race Theory” series, the medical school aims to “catalyze anti-racist practice through education” and create an “anti-racist workforce.”
The document, which has been approved by the school’s dean Dr. Mary E. Klotman, claimed traditional expectations such as arriving for work on time and well-dressed were aspects of “white supremacy culture.”

hite people and the ideas, thoughts, beliefs, and actions of white people are superior to People of Color and their ideas, thoughts, beliefs and actions,” according to the report.

After claiming that the United States is rigged in favor of people “solely because they are White,” the document continued to say that “white supremacy culture” is “power hoarding” at the expense of minorities.

More here on Communist retrogressive nostalgia for Paleolithic times: https://wokespy.com/apparently-youre-a-white-supremacist-if-you-show-up-to-work-on-time/
 
Wokesy stealing content from ny post who stole content from Fox News.

Jfc
 
Wokesy stealing content from ny post who stole content from Fox News.

Jfc
You should learn how to spell. Was there anything illegal about Wokespy reposting a link to the NYP article? Was the article content in error?
 
You should learn how to spell. Was there anything illegal about Wokespy reposting a link to the NYP article? Was the article content in error?
Need a copy of White Fragility? I’ll send you a copy.

123 DumbRacistFuck Lane right?
 
Good post though, and yes, it IS cultural. That's why Africa is such a mess. Nothing to do with race. It's all about culture.
And it always was and that's exactly why DEI is bullshit destined to fail every time it's tried.

If the democrat party hadn't played the DEI game with their VP pick they wouldn't be in the pickle they're in today, or at least not as bad a pickle.
 
You should learn how to spell. Was there anything illegal about Wokespy reposting a link to the NYP article? Was the article content in error?
"Independent journalists" taking other people's content for their own.

Yep ..nothing wrong there. ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯
 
"Independent journalists" taking other people's content for their own.

Yep ..nothing wrong there. ¯⁠\⁠(⁠°⁠_⁠o⁠)⁠/⁠¯
How do you know they don't have a legal agreement to do so? Let us know when a lawsuit is filed for copywrite infringement.
 
I'm reading a book by Pete Hegseth, the amiable dunce on Fox 'n Friends who has positioned himself as some sort of "military expert" because unlike the vast majority of Fox, he actually served in combat.

His latest book The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free has an interesting thesis:

The last time the US military achieved the unconditional surrender of an enemy was in World War 2.
The last time the US military was segregated by race was also World War 2.
"Draw your own conclusion" is the unspoken thought here.

Every single defeat, withdrawal, battle calamity, etc since then can be directly attributable to integrated army units, homosexuals, women serving in the military and/or a lack of white male general officers in the Army.

When you've gotten to the point where manly White men can no longer make comments about n-words, cunts or fags without facing repercussions for their free speech, you've dulled the "tip of the spear".

He basically urges a return to segregated Army units, it won't make "colored" units any less brave, #ThosePeople won plenty of medals for bravery in all wars....they'd likely be better off with "their own kind".

Oh and anyone who criticized American involvement in Afghanistan is a traitor, with the notable exception of convicted felon Donald J. Trump, who was "embarassingly correct" when he referred to Americans in Afghanistan as an "idiotic war".
 
How do you know they don't have a legal agreement to do so? Let us know when a lawsuit is filed for copywrite infringement.
You're missing the point. Copying others' content isn't journalism. It's copying.

I don't give a fuck about the legalities.....not to mention a large portion of these "news" sites are likely owned by other countries.
 
I'm reading a book by Pete Hegseth, the amiable dunce on Fox 'n Friends who has positioned himself as some sort of "military expert" because unlike the vast majority of Fox, he actually served in combat.

His latest book The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free has an interesting thesis:

The last time the US military achieved the unconditional surrender of an enemy was in World War 2.
The last time the US military was segregated by race was also World War 2.
"Draw your own conclusion" is the unspoken thought here.

Every single defeat, withdrawal, battle calamity, etc since then can be directly attributable to integrated army units, homosexuals, women serving in the military and/or a lack of white male general officers in the Army.

When you've gotten to the point where manly White men can no longer make comments about n-words, cunts or fags without facing repercussions for their free speech, you've dulled the "tip of the spear".

He basically urges a return to segregated Army units, it won't make "colored" units any less brave, #ThosePeople won plenty of medals for bravery in all wars....they'd likely be better off with "their own kind".

Oh and anyone who criticized American involvement in Afghanistan is a traitor, with the notable exception of convicted felon Donald J. Trump, who was "embarassingly correct" when he referred to Americans in Afghanistan as an "idiotic war".
You lie.
 
And it always was and that's exactly why DEI is bullshit destined to fail every time it's tried.

If the democrat party hadn't played the DEI game with their VP pick they wouldn't be in the pickle they're in today, or at least not as bad a pickle.

No DEI is not destined to fail nor has it had a failling track record. The Democrats would be in the exact same problem with or without Kamala who is qualified for the job to begin with but that's not really the point. The point is people like you don't care about qualifications.
 
If the democrat party hadn't played the DEI game with their VP pick they wouldn't be in the pickle they're in today, or at least not as bad a pickle.
Nonsense. The right wing shit machine and their patsies in the SCLM are just as willing to smear white male Democrats.
 
And it always was and that's exactly why DEI is bullshit destined to fail every time it's tried.

If the democrat party hadn't played the DEI game with their VP pick they wouldn't be in the pickle they're in today, or at least not as bad a pickle.
Oh look.
The ossified oracle of obstinance is standin' tall for the aging shrinking White Patriarchy.
:rolleyes:
 
I'm reading a book by Pete Hegseth, the amiable dunce on Fox 'n Friends who has positioned himself as some sort of "military expert" because unlike the vast majority of Fox, he actually served in combat.

His latest book The War on Warriors: Behind the Betrayal of the Men Who Keep Us Free has an interesting thesis:

The last time the US military achieved the unconditional surrender of an enemy was in World War 2.
The last time the US military was segregated by race was also World War 2.
"Draw your own conclusion" is the unspoken thought here.

Every single defeat, withdrawal, battle calamity, etc since then can be directly attributable to integrated army units, homosexuals, women serving in the military and/or a lack of white male general officers in the Army.

When you've gotten to the point where manly White men can no longer make comments about n-words, cunts or fags without facing repercussions for their free speech, you've dulled the "tip of the spear".

He basically urges a return to segregated Army units, it won't make "colored" units any less brave, #ThosePeople won plenty of medals for bravery in all wars....they'd likely be better off with "their own kind".

Oh and anyone who criticized American involvement in Afghanistan is a traitor, with the notable exception of convicted felon Donald J. Trump, who was "embarassingly correct" when he referred to Americans in Afghanistan as an "idiotic war".

Good point, but again, it goes back to unit cohesion, training and mindset. And again, culture. There's a reason the best militaries in the world are all European. It sure wasn't the Chinese Empire on which the sun never set. It could have been, but China just did not have the cultural underpinning. And Culture. Yes, Chinese can be good, so can Vietnamese, Koreans, Japanese, but Europeans (Americans cough cough) annihilated the Japanese in WW2.

Now I'd argue against racist segregation for the US Military and say again, culture. A shared ethos and set of beliefs is what's all important. A voluntary military with a clear war-fighting ethos and a culture based on that, and on selecting the best is what we need. Not DEI, or all the rest of the woke crap. That sort of bullshit destroys cohesiveness and detracts from the military's prime mission, which is to go out there and kill the other side, efficiently, effectively and terminally. Anything else is a distraction.
 
Oh look.
The ossified oracle of obstinance is standin' tall for the aging shrinking White Patriarchy.
:rolleyes:
Dude, it's the white patriarchy that wins wars and keeps you snug and safe in your cosy little bed Alternatively, go live in Chicongo, where the white patriarchy was evicted....lol
 
Good point, but again, it goes back to unit cohesion, training and mindset. And again, culture. There's a reason the best militaries in the world are all European. It sure wasn't the Chinese Empire on which the sun never set. It could have been, but China just did not have the cultural underpinning. And Culture. Yes, Chinese can be good, so can Vietnamese, Koreans, Japanese, but Europeans (Americans cough cough) annihilated the Japanese in WW2.

Now I'd argue against racist segregation for the US Military and say again, culture. A shared ethos and set of beliefs is what's all important. A voluntary military with a clear war-fighting ethos and a culture based on that, and on selecting the best is what we need. Not DEI, or all the rest of the woke crap. That sort of bullshit destroys cohesiveness and detracts from the military's prime mission, which is to go out there and kill the other side, efficiently, effectively and terminally. Anything else is a distraction.
Genghis Khan conquered more territory in his lifetime than Alexander the Great. The Mongol Empire at its height was larger than the Roman Empire at its height. What was it about the European mindset and culture that made them militarily inferior to Asians?
 
Good point, but again, it goes back to unit cohesion, training and mindset. And again, culture. There's a reason the best militaries in the world are all European. It sure wasn't the Chinese Empire on which the sun never set. It could have been, but China just did not have the cultural underpinning. And Culture. Yes, Chinese can be good, so can Vietnamese, Koreans, Japanese, but Europeans (Americans cough cough) annihilated the Japanese in WW2.

Now I'd argue against racist segregation for the US Military and say again, culture. A shared ethos and set of beliefs is what's all important. A voluntary military with a clear war-fighting ethos and a culture based on that, and on selecting the best is what we need. Not DEI, or all the rest of the woke crap. That sort of bullshit destroys cohesiveness and detracts from the military's prime mission, which is to go out there and kill the other side, efficiently, effectively and terminally. Anything else is a distraction.

Yeah. They had the best materials and most warlike cultures by leaps and bounds. The Japanese didn't lose because culture but because of resources and that has always been the case.

The "Woke crap" is necessary to a good culture and ethos. IT does not destroy cohesiveness at all nor does it detract from the prime mission which stopped really being a thing decades ago anyhow. People like you are a danger to any hope of true cohesion.
 
A voluntary military with a clear war-fighting ethos and a culture based on that, and on selecting the best is what we need. Not DEI, or all the rest of the woke crap. That sort of bullshit destroys cohesiveness and detracts from the military's prime mission, which is to go out there and kill the other side, efficiently, effectively and terminally. Anything else is a distraction.
That is exactly what your ideological forebears said about Truman integrating the military in 1948, and about admitting women to the service academies in the 1970s. If that's the company you want to keep, that's up to you, but...
 
After all these years of 'guns are my culture', 'state's rights (to have slavery) are my culture', 'statues of insurrectionists are my culture' let's pretend that 'turning up late for work' is the culture of those people who are only fit to work as golf caddies for billionaires.
 
After all these years of 'guns are my culture', 'state's rights (to have slavery) are my culture', 'statues of insurrectionists are my culture' let's pretend that 'turning up late for work' is the culture of those people who are only fit to work as golf caddies for billionaires.

"Right"guide’s delicate privileged white male sensibilities and sensitivities were offended by "something"… again…

❄️
 
Good point, but again, it goes back to unit cohesion, training and mindset. And again, culture. There's a reason the best militaries in the world are all European. It sure wasn't the Chinese Empire on which the sun never set. It could have been, but China just did not have the cultural underpinning. And Culture. Yes, Chinese can be good, so can Vietnamese, Koreans, Japanese, but Europeans (Americans cough cough) annihilated the Japanese in WW2.

Now I'd argue against racist segregation for the US Military and say again, culture. A shared ethos and set of beliefs is what's all important. A voluntary military with a clear war-fighting ethos and a culture based on that, and on selecting the best is what we need. Not DEI, or all the rest of the woke crap. That sort of bullshit destroys cohesiveness and detracts from the military's prime mission, which is to go out there and kill the other side, efficiently, effectively and terminally. Anything else is a distraction.
Well said!! The mission is to train to kill the enemy. Individualism has no role in military training or mission success. These woke generals need to re-familiarize themselves with the old tried and true FM manuals on leadership where DEI isn’t part of it.
 
Back
Top