Wyoming bill seeks to end child marriage... republican party outraged

[butters]

The Wyoming Republican Party is seeking to kill a bill working its way through the state Legislature proposing to raise the state's legal marriage age to 16, arguing that putting "arbitrary" limits on child marriage interferes with parental rights and religious liberty.

holeeee fuck!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=d38f4decf24f4da9a0dd2a3d27913ef7

 

[LLCox]

Would you like a candy cane, little girl...

Wyoming... Mothers hide your daughters.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

holeeee fuck!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=d38f4decf24f4da9a0dd2a3d27913ef7

Like the rest of us, they're opposed to pedophilia unless it involves marriage

 

[domroger]

holeeee fuck!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=d38f4decf24f4da9a0dd2a3d27913ef7

When is the USA going to join civilisation?

 

[occupatus]

Non of the above cretins have any issues with suggestive drag queen shows in schools

With puberty blockers given to young kids WITHOUT parents being informed

 

[occupatus]

The above cretins watched every Teen Mother shows on degenerate tv

 

[VinnyVeritas]

.....

 

[Chobham]

Non of the above cretins have any issues with suggestive drag queen shows in schools

With puberty blockers given to young kids WITHOUT parents being informed

Good points.

 

[occupatus]

The above cretins watched every Teen Mother shows on degenerate tv

indeed

teen mon shows all over tv

and yet CRETINS have an issue with only an R attached

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=teen+mom

 

[ll74]

Suggestive drag show invitation for BB
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0107614/mediaviewer/rm4228632064?ref_=ext_shr_lnk

 

[RobDownSouth]

Non of the above cretins have any issues with suggestive drag queen shows in schools

With puberty blockers given to young kids WITHOUT parents being informed

Deflecting and pivoting immediately from underage marriages to drag queens. It is their way.

What exactly is the issue here? Don't states have the right to make their own laws?

Using the fig leaf of "States Rights" to condone marriage under the age of 16? Doesn't get moar MAGA than that!

 

[occupatus]

Deflecting and pivoting immediately from underage marriages to drag queens. It is their way.

Using the fig leaf of "States Rights" to condone marriage under the age of 16? Doesn't get moar MAGA than that!

selective outrage, as usual

indeed

teen mom shows all over tv

and yet CRETINS have an issue with only an R attached

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=teen+mom

 

[YANKEE DAN]

SO this headline is a bit misleading, the republican party controls the house and they passed the bill. It would be true to say that some republicans opposed it but if the party had wanted to kill it the bill would be dead. The bill was sponsered by Rep. Dan Zwonitzer, a republican.

 

[Chobham]

SO this headline is a bit misleading, the republican party controls the house and they passed the bill. It would be true to say that some republicans opposed it but if the party had wanted to kill it the bill would be dead. The bill was sponsered by Rep. Dan Zwonitzer, a republican.

That figures given the track record of the OP.

 

[Dribble]

One needs to understand...Wyoming is a Mormon state. More so than Utah per capita. But there are conclaves within Wyoming...entire towns.. that are not reoresentative of the accepted Mormon faith. They believe in polygamy...and they believe in old fucks be awarded 12 and 13 yr old girls to become "wives"...breeding stock. In fact, they buy them. Now...Wyoming can't take on the Mormon faith...and since the church itself has written words condemning the behavior, but refuse to enforce it...the State had to say...you cannot do this. It won't stop it. People really don't understand how backwards the state really is. But it is a step in the right direction

 

[RobDownSouth]

selective outrage, as usual

indeed

teen mom shows all over tv

and yet CRETINS have an issue with only an R attached

https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=teen+mom

Y'know something, Beebee, I understand that there are "teen mom" shows on cable TV. That sort of thing doesn't appeal to me, and I've never watched a single episode. I'm guessing you haven't either (am I right?). You seem...well, "outraged" that a show like this even exists (am I right?).

and yet....somebody is watching it, or else it wouldn't be on TV. Hmm?

The bottom line: You seem outraged that someone has different tastes in TV shows than you...is that a fair assessment?

 

[butters]

SO this headline is a bit misleading, the republican party controls the house and they passed the bill. It would be true to say that some republicans opposed it but if the party had wanted to kill it the bill would be dead. The bill was sponsered by Rep. Dan Zwonitzer, a republican.

the first vote has seen it pass, by a 15-12 count. It still has to pass 2 more votes. How many of those 15 voting to pass the bill were republican? I've not gone to look just yet and, yes, not all republicans are complete and utter arseholes who want to allow coercive situations to exist that could force a 12 or 13 year old girl into a 'righteous' marriage with someone potentially a lot older than her who has got her pregnant, just so it can be considered a good thing in the eyes of god, as a "properly desired and well-ordered marriage". Of course, that might just be a case of most adults not wanting their young teenagers married to someone who's unsuitable enough to have had sex with them in the first place, let alone pregnant.

The key issue, the analysis states, is that children ages 15 and younger still can get pregnant but could no longer get married legally if the law passes.

This denies the right of the teen’s baby to be raised in a stable home by his or her mother and father, the document says, citing the state Constitution’s promise of equal protection as a basis.

“Parents, by virtue of their right to conceive children, have the pre-political, i.e. God-given, responsibility to raise their own children,” the document continues. “This right and responsibility includes guiding their own maturing children into the estate of Holy Matrimony.”

https://cowboystatedaily.com/2023/0...w-says-younger-teens-should-be-able-to-marry/

 

[occupatus]

Y'know something, Beebee, I understand that there are "teen mom" shows on cable TV. That sort of thing doesn't appeal to me, and I've never watched a single episode. I'm guessing you haven't either (am I right?). You seem...well, "outraged" that a show like this even exists (am I right?).

and yet....somebody is watching it, or else it wouldn't be on TV. Hmm?

The bottom line: You seem outraged that someone has different tastes in TV shows than you...is that a fair assessment?

The bottom line: You seem outraged that someone that is an R or R related,...is that a fair assessment?

 

[Rightguide]

holeeee fuck!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=d38f4decf24f4da9a0dd2a3d27913ef7

Though I would oppose such marriages there is more detail on the Bill and it's underlying arguments here:

https://cowboystatedaily.com/2023/0...w-says-younger-teens-should-be-able-to-marry/

 

[occupatus]

holeeee fuck!

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...sedgntp&cvid=d38f4decf24f4da9a0dd2a3d27913ef7

fucking cunt is outraged by the above yet ignires this

WHY>

Missouri’s new attorney general says his office has been investigating “disturbing allegations” that a transgender center has “been harming hundreds of children each year.”
Andrew Bailey confirmed the probe Thursday after whistleblower Jamie Reed, 42, came forward with damning allegations about the Washington University Transgender Center at St. Louis Children’s Hospital.
A “full investigation into these shocking allegations” was launched two weeks ago, the Republican prosecutor said.

As it turns out, Bailey jumped on this situation as soon as whistleblower Jamie Reed came forward. His office has already taken a sworn affidavit from Reed, along with documents that support her allegations.

A spokesperson for Washington University further claimed that they were “very alarmed” by the allegations and have launched an investigation of their own. That sounds as if it might prove to be a promising development. But at the same time, all of these horrors were taking place right in their own clinic. How could they have had no idea what was going on there?

 

[Escierto]

It’s no surprise. This is why they are always on the soapbox over sexual “grooming” of children. Because Republicans are the sick pedophiles, rapists, and sexual predators of this country. They are fucking white trash vermin scum, every one of them.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The bottom line: You seem outraged that someone that is an R or R related,...is that a fair assessment?

Can you please rephrase that in the form of a statement? "an R or R related" what?

 

[Rightguide]

It’s no surprise. This is why they are always on the soapbox over sexual “grooming” of children. Because Republicans are the sick pedophiles, rapists, and sexual predators of this country. They are fucking white trash vermin scum, every one of them.

And you're a dumb son of a bitch.

 

[Fuzzy1975]

And you're a dumb son of a bitch.

Mute male child of a dog? not likely.....

 

[butters]

Y'know something, Beebee, I understand that there are "teen mom" shows on cable TV. That sort of thing doesn't appeal to me, and I've never watched a single episode. I'm guessing you haven't either (am I right?). You seem...well, "outraged" that a show like this even exists (am I right?).

and yet....somebody is watching it, or else it wouldn't be on TV. Hmm?

The bottom line: You seem outraged that someone has different tastes in TV shows than you...is that a fair assessment?

i would never bother watching that kind of programme, nor the kiddie beauty pageants or the kardashians, anything like that. simply find no desire to look at them. as you state, though, they get enough ratings to stay on so they've found an audience