LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Wuhan Flu update.

Sean said:
As a general rule, assume the opposite of anything zero hedge prints is the truth.
Click to expand...

ZH is one of the few reliable fact based and well researched news venues today. The MSM is so full of shit it is not worth wiping your arse with it.
 
Pairaclities said:
ZH is one of the few reliable fact based and well researched news venues today. The MSM is so full of shit it is not worth wiping your arse with it.
Click to expand...

Sure they are.

Zero Hedge is a far-right libertarian financial blog

Zero Hedge, per its motto, is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.
Click to expand...
 
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/



ZeroHedge was banned from Twitter in February 2020; according to some, its last tweet referred to speculation the coronavirus could be a bioweapon, and BuzzFeed accused ZeroHedge of doxxing a Chinese scientist. As of June 2020, its account had been restored. ZeroHedge has been banned from other sites as well.

Writers on the left and right have referred to ZeroHedge as conservative; BuzzFeed referred to ZeroHedge as a "popular pro-Trump website," and Gateway Pundit referred to ZeroHedge as a "top conservative and pro-Trump website." Wikipedia refers to ZeroHedge as "a libertarian or right-wing financial blog," and notes that it reflects an "adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles." Wikipedia also says that ZeroHedge has "expanded into non-financial analysis, such as conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric that has been associated with the Radical right (United States) and a pro-Russian bias."

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/zerohedge-media-bias
 
ZeroHedge Bias and Reliability - Ad Fontes Media

It was created in 2009 by Daniel Ivandjiiski, a Bulgarian former investment banker in the U.S. ZeroHedge has been accused of spreading conspiracy theories and was temporarily suspended from Twitter in early 2020. Ad Fontes Media rates ZeroHedge in the skews right category of bias and as mixed reliability in terms of reliability.

https://www.adfontesmedia.com/zerohedge-bias-and-reliability/
 
HisArpy said:
Cite? Or just another fucking Archie Bunker-ism as usual?
Click to expand...

jaF0 said:
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/



ZeroHedge was banned from Twitter in February 2020; according to some, its last tweet referred to speculation the coronavirus could be a bioweapon, and BuzzFeed accused ZeroHedge of doxxing a Chinese scientist. As of June 2020, its account had been restored. ZeroHedge has been banned from other sites as well.

Writers on the left and right have referred to ZeroHedge as conservative; BuzzFeed referred to ZeroHedge as a "popular pro-Trump website," and Gateway Pundit referred to ZeroHedge as a "top conservative and pro-Trump website." Wikipedia refers to ZeroHedge as "a libertarian or right-wing financial blog," and notes that it reflects an "adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles." Wikipedia also says that ZeroHedge has "expanded into non-financial analysis, such as conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric that has been associated with the Radical right (United States) and a pro-Russian bias."

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/zerohedge-media-bias
Click to expand...

jaF0 said:
ZeroHedge Bias and Reliability - Ad Fontes Media

It was created in 2009 by Daniel Ivandjiiski, a Bulgarian former investment banker in the U.S. ZeroHedge has been accused of spreading conspiracy theories and was temporarily suspended from Twitter in early 2020. Ad Fontes Media rates ZeroHedge in the skews right category of bias and as mixed reliability in terms of reliability.

https://www.adfontesmedia.com/zerohedge-bias-and-reliability/
Click to expand...

Cite(s).
 
Pookie said:
He's been assimilated into the Trumper hive. Facts live in a different reality there.
Click to expand...

How did I miss this jewel of a thread! sigh is giving a stalk worthy performance calling out the cherry picking bullshit. Or b******t as the southern charmers like to gently suggest so as not to offend sensibilities.
 
jaF0 said:
Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence.

Overall, we rate ZeroHedge an extreme right-biased conspiracy website based on the promotion of false/misleading/debunked information that routinely denigrates the left.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/zero-hedge/



ZeroHedge was banned from Twitter in February 2020; according to some, its last tweet referred to speculation the coronavirus could be a bioweapon, and BuzzFeed accused ZeroHedge of doxxing a Chinese scientist. As of June 2020, its account had been restored. ZeroHedge has been banned from other sites as well.



Writers on the left and right have referred to ZeroHedge as conservative; BuzzFeed referred to ZeroHedge as a "popular pro-Trump website," and Gateway Pundit referred to ZeroHedge as a "top conservative and pro-Trump website." Wikipedia refers to ZeroHedge as "a libertarian or right-wing financial blog," and notes that it reflects an "adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles." Wikipedia also says that ZeroHedge has "expanded into non-financial analysis, such as conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric that has been associated with the Radical right (United States) and a pro-Russian bias."

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/zerohedge-media-bias
Click to expand...

Yep, got it. All the leftists and communists hate the site because their lies get exposed.
Yes they got banned from Twitter for suggesting that the Wuhan Virus was developed in the Wuhan lab. They got re-instated some months later when many scientific minds agreed this was the most likely explanation, and the WHO is too spineless to take on China. So there is a great example of anti-woke journalism. Also, Jack Dorsey apologized to Zero Hedge for the ban.
 
Last edited:
Here's a link to provoke thought on the subject. I don't think the BBC is some extreme right wing rag, but others may think otherwise.

Wuhan Flu Origins

Facts;

Three researchers that worked at that lab were hospitalized in Nov. of 2019.

The lab was actively engaged in research on coronavirus's carried by bats.

Wuhan is the epicenter of the epidemic.

No evidence was found, or brought forth, that the 'wet' market was the origin.

I doubt that at this late a date that any irrefutable evidence is going to be found. Both the CCP and the researchers at that lab are going to do every thing in their power to bury any 'smoking gun' evidence. But the circumstantial evidence is damning.

What I know about the Mainland Chinese. They lie as a matter of course, often when the lie serves no purpose. It's not that the Chinese are liars by choice, it's a matter of survival. The consequences of making a mistake or causing embarrassment to the CCP are dire. Four generations of Communist rule have forced this upon them. The Taiwanese have no such tendencies. And they're sloppy. They take short cuts sacrificing safety in the interest of production. Safety is NOT #1 in their world.

Back to the link I provided. The last paragraph basically exposes the dilemma. Any investigation will require the full cooperation of the CCP. That fact in and of itself is highly problematic. The notion of a 'no fault' policy is fine on the surface but with 3.5 million deaths, and counting, world wide it's unlikely that the public at large is going to take such an unprejudiced view and the CCP is well aware of that fact too.

So far the CCP's reaction is to accuse and deflect and that too is telling.
 
Pairaclities said:
Yep, got it. All the leftists and communists hate the site because their lies get exposed.
Yes they got banned from Twitter for suggesting that the Wuhan Virus was developed in the Wuhan lab. They got re-instated some months later when many scientific minds agreed this was the most likely explanation, and the WHO is too spineless to take on China. So there is a great example of anti-woke journalism. Also, Jack Dorsey apologized to Zero Hedge for the ban.
Click to expand...

Basically, the "cites" that are posted are from the era of "orange man bad" and every progressive out there was doing their best to deny everything and anything that Trump had any contact or agreement with, even if it was true and factual.

For ex; see Fauci's backpeddling lately on the whole "wuhan lab leak" theory. Only a couple of weeks ago he was all in on "that's just not possible."

Those who refer to citation from that period of time as authority are merely pissing into the wind because everything is a-changing.
 
If it turns out that the OP was right, will the time space continuum as we knew it still exist?
 
bellisarius said:
Well, it's been a little over a year since the Wuhan Flu turned the world upside down. What have we learned?

In the lock down vs. no lock down battle there appears to be no clear winner. As predicted the virus found a way to defeat most measures put in place. The only real difference between the two approaches was the severe economic damage suffered by those governmental entities that went the hard lock down route.

Yes folks, it did come from that lab in Wuhan. Only the hardest core shill for the CCP is trying to pretend otherwise now. Once again I 'called the ball' on that one. The only questions left to be answered are;

1. Was it purposely released?

2. Was it an engineered virus?

On the first question I'll posit "No". I think it was a result of typical Chinese sloppy safeguards.

The answer to the second is way above my pay grade but serious researchers are now beginning to ask that same question. The problem here is that the CCP has had plenty of time to cover it's tracks. An investigation into this question should have been started almost immediately.

We were assured by the Media and respected researchers that the virus did NOT originate in that lab and that there was "no way" that this was an engineered virus. Media and researchers that all turned out to be lying sons a bitches. I hold the media especially at fault in that instead of digging for the truth they were actively complicit in burying the truth. Journalism in any real sense of the word is dead. Blindly believe the media, any media, at your own peril.
Click to expand...

Yeah, this was a no-brainer from the git-go.

You cannot trust China. The only place worse is The Hermit Kingdom...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

EricaAnna
Erica's Brand New Thread
9 10 11
Replies
262
Views
6K
EricaAnna
EricaAnna
EG2001
Working in adult industry in 2001
Replies
3
Views
263
neon_noodle
neon_noodle
MusicForTheDeaf
Once AI replaces 100% of employment, the elites are going to cull the rabble?
Replies
13
Views
475
MusicForTheDeaf
MusicForTheDeaf
X
GIVING and/or Getting (the story of me)
Replies
1
Views
101
xXxplorher
X
Skippertyrell
Massage - more on offer?
Replies
4
Views
365
Dearelliot
D
Back
Top