Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unless it's "...not bad for a 84-year old." Then it kind of has a point.dr_mabeuse said:Where it's bad is when they look at themselves with that usual Lit version of smug satisfaction: "38-D breasts, long flowing red hair, piercing green eyes. Not bad for a __ __-year old". That kind of thing.
BlackShanglan said:But that's just me. I'm not very visual and I often write in the first person, so some of my characters never even mention a hair color.
So what's wrong with, "She brushed a lock of hair out of her eyes" ?TheEarl said:I find it very difficult to work personal descriptions into 3rd person pieces, let alone 1st person. I'm well on the way to developing a cliche of my very own with sentences along the lines of "She brushed a lock of ____ hair out of her eyes" which generally turns up whenever I want to specify hair colour.
I'm currently trying to weed that one out.
The Earl
Dranoel said:So what's wrong with, "She brushed a lock of hair out of her eyes" ?
WHat I'm saying is to just use the line without a color. Use it just the way I typed it. It's a normal action and adds realism to the character without detailing the description.TheEarl said:Cause I use it in every single story just as a mechanism to introduce the hair colour! First few times up, it's okay. But today I actually caught myself using it twice in one chapter when introducing two different characters.
The Earl
TheEarl said:Are they ever acceptable? I have a good reason for my character to be lookingi n a mirror and it seems a bit of a waste not to use the opportunity to describe her at the same time. Is it too much of a cliche?
The Earl
CharleyH said:I agree with Shanglan that is hard not to make it cliche', the only way, and I have not read those stories ... is to reverse. The mirror is very Freudian, afterall. Silly Freudians.How can a mirror scene NOT MAKE a woman inspect herself? (Thats to Shanglan) And do men have the same problem? In the mirror?
BlackShanglan said:Oh, I agree entirely. My point is not that it cannot be done well; my point is that it rarely is. As a result, anyone trying to do it well is laboring not only with the writing of the scene itself, but with the reader resistance built up from a thousand stories in which the lead looks in the mirror and smugly rattles off a description of the author's ideal physical type, laced with the self-congratulatory-sounding admiration that is really the author's reaction to the character and not the character's own realistic reaction to him or herself. Most humans I know, when looking in a mirror, are indeed inspecting - as opposed to admiring. They are a great deal less likely to be thinking "great tits, thank God I work out every day, I love my strawberry blonde hair and I easily look ten years younger than I am" than they are to be thinking "oh, dear God, is that a zit?"
Shanglan
The previous sentence is true!Liar said:You can do anything, if you do it right.
TheEarl said:Are they ever acceptable? I have a good reason for my character to be lookingi n a mirror and it seems a bit of a waste not to use the opportunity to describe her at the same time. Is it too much of a cliche?
exactly. has to be reason and this goes for anything that is there. i think such devices are great plants to use those items later on in the story. example being, describing a tattoo a charcter has at the beginning then later having another character identifying said tattooed one in a police line up or on a slab in the morgue.Colleen Thomas said:I use them occasionally, but my rule is to have a reason for her to be there and usually, she is looking for something specific.