Writing Fluff - A guilty pleasure?

I've been guilty more than once of taking some 'fluff' and ending up with many chapters, because I want to work more into it and voila, it's long and now has some plot and drama. I know, totally backwards.

And all the while I'm thinking of spin-offs for various characters. :sick:
 
Last edited:
I’d rather work on the fluff story, get it out of my head. Such stories are usually finished faster and once it’s done, I can get back to the interesting narrative with my full attention.
 
The last three stories that I published here, one in Loving Wives, one in How To, and one in Fan Fiction/Celebrity, were all purposeful distractions from the novel-length work in progress that I have almost finished.

None of the latest stories was longer than 6 Lit pages compared to my average novel length of 30+ pages.

While I hesitate to consider them "fluff", they do serve as a diversion that allows me to return back to my novel with a fresh perspective each time.
 
When you have two stories or story ideas that you are working on, and one has a strong narrative and story arc (maybe it's a heavier, more serious idea), and the other is a simple piece of short-form fluff that you started on a whim (perhaps lighter, more fun, and a less substantial idea) what do you like to do?

Which would you rather work on and why?
`Not sure that any of my stories qualify as having a strong narrative and story arc. However, I recently completed a competition entry that is absolute fluff.

Assuming that I face such a choice, there are a couple of factors that influence my choice:
  • I mostly write series, and try to finish all the episodes before posting any, so this gets priority
  • But if I need a break, during or after a series, then I might switch to a fluff piece
 
Besides, I'm sure there are elitist literary circles where everything on this site would be considered "fluff."
You don't have to leave this site to find those. There are authors here who are far above us commoners who write incredible literary erotica.
 
I tend to write longer more 'in depth' stories, but I do write some fluff that I put in collections. It's a fun break to just cut loose sometimes and not think about anything more than having some clean dirty fun.

Thing is when you build a base here they tend to want the same thing over and over. I put a short stroker up a few years ago and the score was lower than usual and I had several comments along the line of "I like your longer stories better"

It's easy to become a victim of your own style on a site like this.
 
To me, fluff is stuff that has little to no conflict or just weak or no motive to drive the happy/kinky events.
Fluff for me can also be when I let the silliness in the story take control. I try to use some humor in a lot of my stories, but it is just a flavor to cut the heaviness. Sometimes I want to just forget the heaviness and be silly. Sometimes over the top, like my one comedy story (The Great Cupcake Caper) and other times, a little bit of silliness if the point of the story (Dolls).

Fluff pieces for me also tend to be short (<5K words) while most of the rest of mine range from 15K up to novels. Fluff just doesn't require the same commitment and concentration that the other pieces do.
 
When you have two stories or story ideas that you are working on, and one has a strong narrative and story arc (maybe it's a heavier, more serious idea), and the other is a simple piece of short-form fluff that you started on a whim (perhaps lighter, more fun, and a less substantial idea) what do you like to do?
I call the second type "queue jumpers". I have a list of stories to write in my head (getting shorter, finally!) - but if any idea for something quick comes along, I'll often leave the longer pieces and knock the shorter one out quickly. They are usually more fun to write.
 
Back
Top